容量干血斑中内分泌蛋白的多重定量分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
William Stauch, Johan Olausson, Annika Bendes, Olof Beck, Jochen M Schwenk
{"title":"容量干血斑中内分泌蛋白的多重定量分析。","authors":"William Stauch, Johan Olausson, Annika Bendes, Olof Beck, Jochen M Schwenk","doi":"10.1186/s12014-025-09539-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating proteins are routinely quantified from liquid biopsies to deduce health and disease. Among these are endocrine protein hormones, which regulate human growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction. Most commonly, these proteins are analyzed in plasma or serum prepared from venous blood draws. Recently, devices for quantitative capillary sampling from a finger prick have emerged, but their utility for clinical testing remains to be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To study the analytical capabilities of quantitative dried blood spots (qDBS), we quantified the luteinizing hormone subunit beta (LHB), follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB), thyroid-stimulating hormone subunit beta (TSHB), prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone 1 (GH1) by multiplexed immunoassays. We determined the performance of the endocrine hormone assays in paired qDBS and EDTA plasma samples from 100 donors (90% females) aged 4 to 78. Lastly, we compared the protein levels with those from an accredited clinical chemistry laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiplexed analysis showed precise protein quantifications in qDBS (mean CV = 8.3%), high concordance with plasma levels (r = 0.88 to 0.99), and accuracy being matrix- and protein-dependent (recovery: 80-225%). Using the current protocol and sample dilutions, reported protein concentrations were 1.2 to 7.5 times higher in plasma than in qDBS eluates. Concentrations from multiplexed plasma assays agreed with the clinical data (r = 0.87 to 0.99) and decreased slightly when comparing clinical plasma data with multiplexed qDBS assays (r = 0.76 to 0.98). Significant increases in age-related FSHB and LHB levels were observed in females in all specimens and assays (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows the suitability of modern qDBS devices for quantifying clinically informative proteins in multiplexed assays and highlights the need for future work on specimen-specific optimization and standards. Volumetric DBS sampling offers new routines for accurate protein quantification for precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"22 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplex quantification of endocrine proteins in volumetric dried blood spots.\",\"authors\":\"William Stauch, Johan Olausson, Annika Bendes, Olof Beck, Jochen M Schwenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12014-025-09539-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating proteins are routinely quantified from liquid biopsies to deduce health and disease. Among these are endocrine protein hormones, which regulate human growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction. Most commonly, these proteins are analyzed in plasma or serum prepared from venous blood draws. Recently, devices for quantitative capillary sampling from a finger prick have emerged, but their utility for clinical testing remains to be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To study the analytical capabilities of quantitative dried blood spots (qDBS), we quantified the luteinizing hormone subunit beta (LHB), follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB), thyroid-stimulating hormone subunit beta (TSHB), prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone 1 (GH1) by multiplexed immunoassays. We determined the performance of the endocrine hormone assays in paired qDBS and EDTA plasma samples from 100 donors (90% females) aged 4 to 78. Lastly, we compared the protein levels with those from an accredited clinical chemistry laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiplexed analysis showed precise protein quantifications in qDBS (mean CV = 8.3%), high concordance with plasma levels (r = 0.88 to 0.99), and accuracy being matrix- and protein-dependent (recovery: 80-225%). Using the current protocol and sample dilutions, reported protein concentrations were 1.2 to 7.5 times higher in plasma than in qDBS eluates. Concentrations from multiplexed plasma assays agreed with the clinical data (r = 0.87 to 0.99) and decreased slightly when comparing clinical plasma data with multiplexed qDBS assays (r = 0.76 to 0.98). Significant increases in age-related FSHB and LHB levels were observed in females in all specimens and assays (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows the suitability of modern qDBS devices for quantifying clinically informative proteins in multiplexed assays and highlights the need for future work on specimen-specific optimization and standards. Volumetric DBS sampling offers new routines for accurate protein quantification for precision medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-025-09539-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-025-09539-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从液体活检中常规定量循环蛋白来推断健康和疾病。其中包括调节人体生长、发育、新陈代谢和繁殖的内分泌蛋白激素。最常见的是,从静脉血提取的血浆或血清中分析这些蛋白质。最近,从手指刺痛中进行定量毛细血管采样的设备已经出现,但它们在临床测试中的效用仍有待探索。方法:采用多重免疫分析法对促黄体生成素(LHB)、促卵泡激素(FSHB)、促甲状腺激素(TSHB)、催乳素(PRL)、生长激素1 (GH1)进行定量分析,研究定量干血斑(qDBS)的分析能力。我们对100名年龄在4至78岁之间的供者(90%为女性)的qDBS和EDTA配对血浆样本进行了内分泌激素测定。最后,我们将蛋白质水平与经过认证的临床化学实验室的蛋白质水平进行了比较。结果:多重分析显示qDBS中蛋白质定量准确(平均CV = 8.3%),与血浆水平高度一致(r = 0.88 ~ 0.99),准确度依赖于基质和蛋白质(回收率:80 ~ 225%)。使用目前的方案和样品稀释,血浆中的蛋白质浓度比qDBS洗脱液高1.2至7.5倍。多路血浆检测的浓度与临床数据一致(r = 0.87 ~ 0.99),与多路qDBS检测相比略有下降(r = 0.76 ~ 0.98)。在所有标本和分析中,女性中与年龄相关的FSHB和LHB水平显著增加(p)。结论:该研究表明现代qDBS设备在多重分析中定量临床信息蛋白的适用性,并强调了对标本特异性优化和标准的未来工作的必要性。容积DBS取样为精准医学提供了新的蛋白质定量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiplex quantification of endocrine proteins in volumetric dried blood spots.

Background: Circulating proteins are routinely quantified from liquid biopsies to deduce health and disease. Among these are endocrine protein hormones, which regulate human growth, development, metabolism, and reproduction. Most commonly, these proteins are analyzed in plasma or serum prepared from venous blood draws. Recently, devices for quantitative capillary sampling from a finger prick have emerged, but their utility for clinical testing remains to be explored.

Methods: To study the analytical capabilities of quantitative dried blood spots (qDBS), we quantified the luteinizing hormone subunit beta (LHB), follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB), thyroid-stimulating hormone subunit beta (TSHB), prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone 1 (GH1) by multiplexed immunoassays. We determined the performance of the endocrine hormone assays in paired qDBS and EDTA plasma samples from 100 donors (90% females) aged 4 to 78. Lastly, we compared the protein levels with those from an accredited clinical chemistry laboratory.

Results: The multiplexed analysis showed precise protein quantifications in qDBS (mean CV = 8.3%), high concordance with plasma levels (r = 0.88 to 0.99), and accuracy being matrix- and protein-dependent (recovery: 80-225%). Using the current protocol and sample dilutions, reported protein concentrations were 1.2 to 7.5 times higher in plasma than in qDBS eluates. Concentrations from multiplexed plasma assays agreed with the clinical data (r = 0.87 to 0.99) and decreased slightly when comparing clinical plasma data with multiplexed qDBS assays (r = 0.76 to 0.98). Significant increases in age-related FSHB and LHB levels were observed in females in all specimens and assays (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: This study shows the suitability of modern qDBS devices for quantifying clinically informative proteins in multiplexed assays and highlights the need for future work on specimen-specific optimization and standards. Volumetric DBS sampling offers new routines for accurate protein quantification for precision medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信