{"title":"心肺健康自我评估:阶跃测试消除阶跃板的信度和效度评估。","authors":"Fumiko Murai, Rina So, Tomoaki Matsuo","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05786-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) requires specialized equipment and designated spaces, limiting accessibility. To address this, the modified National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan step test (mJST) was developed for self-assessment without a step board. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the mJST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 131 participants (49% female, aged 30-59) were divided into a derivation group (n = 82) to establish an estimated maximal oxygen consumption ( <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub>) model using multiple regression, and validation group (n = 49) to test the accuracy of the model. All participants completed the mJST and a <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> treadmill test. The mJST comprised whole-body exercise for 3min and 40s followed by a 2-min recovery period. Heart rates (HRs) during the mJST were self-recorded using a wrist-worn device and measured via electrocardiograph. Test-retest reliability and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excellent test-retest reliability was observed with electrocardiograph HRs (ICC = 0.92); however, fair to good reliability was observed with the wrist-worn device (ICC = 0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed that mJST overestimated <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> by 1.24 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, likely owing to discrepancies in HR readings from the wrist-worn device. The correlation between estimated and measured <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> was moderate (r = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eliminating the step board in step tests may aid in regular assessments of CRF to support ongoing health management. Despite limitations in device accuracy, the mJST demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity as a practical tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness: evaluation of reliability and validity of a step test eliminating a step board.\",\"authors\":\"Fumiko Murai, Rina So, Tomoaki Matsuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05786-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) requires specialized equipment and designated spaces, limiting accessibility. To address this, the modified National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan step test (mJST) was developed for self-assessment without a step board. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the mJST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 131 participants (49% female, aged 30-59) were divided into a derivation group (n = 82) to establish an estimated maximal oxygen consumption ( <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub>) model using multiple regression, and validation group (n = 49) to test the accuracy of the model. All participants completed the mJST and a <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> treadmill test. The mJST comprised whole-body exercise for 3min and 40s followed by a 2-min recovery period. Heart rates (HRs) during the mJST were self-recorded using a wrist-worn device and measured via electrocardiograph. Test-retest reliability and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excellent test-retest reliability was observed with electrocardiograph HRs (ICC = 0.92); however, fair to good reliability was observed with the wrist-worn device (ICC = 0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed that mJST overestimated <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> by 1.24 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, likely owing to discrepancies in HR readings from the wrist-worn device. The correlation between estimated and measured <math><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2 max</sub> was moderate (r = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eliminating the step board in step tests may aid in regular assessments of CRF to support ongoing health management. Despite limitations in device accuracy, the mJST demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity as a practical tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05786-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05786-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness: evaluation of reliability and validity of a step test eliminating a step board.
Purpose: Conventional assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) requires specialized equipment and designated spaces, limiting accessibility. To address this, the modified National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan step test (mJST) was developed for self-assessment without a step board. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the mJST.
Methods: A total of 131 participants (49% female, aged 30-59) were divided into a derivation group (n = 82) to establish an estimated maximal oxygen consumption ( O2 max) model using multiple regression, and validation group (n = 49) to test the accuracy of the model. All participants completed the mJST and a O2 max treadmill test. The mJST comprised whole-body exercise for 3min and 40s followed by a 2-min recovery period. Heart rates (HRs) during the mJST were self-recorded using a wrist-worn device and measured via electrocardiograph. Test-retest reliability and validity were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Excellent test-retest reliability was observed with electrocardiograph HRs (ICC = 0.92); however, fair to good reliability was observed with the wrist-worn device (ICC = 0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed that mJST overestimated O2 max by 1.24 mL·kg-1·min-1, likely owing to discrepancies in HR readings from the wrist-worn device. The correlation between estimated and measured O2 max was moderate (r = 0.68).
Conclusions: Eliminating the step board in step tests may aid in regular assessments of CRF to support ongoing health management. Despite limitations in device accuracy, the mJST demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity as a practical tool.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.