评估一种新的可视化装置,以提高根管治疗中文件插入的准确性。

Q1 Dentistry
Abubaker Qutieshat, Rajmohan Sivamani Chidambaram, Gurdeep Singh, Samiya Al Ghammari, Ritaj Al Busaidi, Iman Al Sukaiti, Fatima Al Rawas, Mariam Al Balushi, Zahra Al Lawati, Doaa Ahmed, Taif Al Shirawi
{"title":"评估一种新的可视化装置,以提高根管治疗中文件插入的准确性。","authors":"Abubaker Qutieshat, Rajmohan Sivamani Chidambaram, Gurdeep Singh, Samiya Al Ghammari, Ritaj Al Busaidi, Iman Al Sukaiti, Fatima Al Rawas, Mariam Al Balushi, Zahra Al Lawati, Doaa Ahmed, Taif Al Shirawi","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1806961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether adopting a horizontal viewpoint, facilitated by a novel digital assistive device, could enhance endodontic file placement accuracy and reduce operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment.A total of 40 modified upper jaw dental stone models, each accommodating a plastic tooth replacing the upper right second molar, were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 20 each). The mesiobuccal canal of each tooth was prepared to a standardized working length of 21.0 mm and a working width of size 35. A size 40 file with a stopper preadjusted to 19.0 mm was then inserted. In the first (conventional) group, files were placed without assistance; in the second (device-assisted) group, a horizontal-view digital device was designed, developed, and used to align and insert the file. The second operator, blinded to the device's purpose, performed all insertions under simulated clinical conditions. An intraoral scanner subsequently captured the vertical distance from the stopper's bottom surface to a standardized anatomical landmark. Pairwise comparisons between the two groups were computed using alignment software to account for potential measurement artifacts.Normality in both groups was confirmed via the Shapiro-Wilk test. An independent-samples <i>t</i>-test compared mean vertical distances. Additionally, differences in stopper positioning were calculated for all aligned virtual models in CloudCompare.The device-assisted group exhibited a significantly shorter mean stopper-to-landmark distance (0.425 mm, standard deviation [SD] = 0.225) than the conventional group (0.971 mm, SD = 0.432) (<i>t</i> = -5.014, <i>p</i> = 2.534 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). Pairwise analysis highlighted closer apical positioning in the device-assisted group, closely matching pilot study findings that a 26.57° vertical viewing angle can distort perceptions by 0.5 mm. The device's mean intraoral mounting time was 224 s (SD = 35.2), considered negligible over the full treatment duration.Adopting a horizontal perspective with a novel digital assistive device significantly improved file placement accuracy and reduced operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment. Optimizing this device's design and assessing its cost-effectiveness may facilitate broader clinical adoption and further enhance endodontic procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Novel Visualization Device for Improving File Insertion Accuracy During Root Canal Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Abubaker Qutieshat, Rajmohan Sivamani Chidambaram, Gurdeep Singh, Samiya Al Ghammari, Ritaj Al Busaidi, Iman Al Sukaiti, Fatima Al Rawas, Mariam Al Balushi, Zahra Al Lawati, Doaa Ahmed, Taif Al Shirawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1806961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether adopting a horizontal viewpoint, facilitated by a novel digital assistive device, could enhance endodontic file placement accuracy and reduce operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment.A total of 40 modified upper jaw dental stone models, each accommodating a plastic tooth replacing the upper right second molar, were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 20 each). The mesiobuccal canal of each tooth was prepared to a standardized working length of 21.0 mm and a working width of size 35. A size 40 file with a stopper preadjusted to 19.0 mm was then inserted. In the first (conventional) group, files were placed without assistance; in the second (device-assisted) group, a horizontal-view digital device was designed, developed, and used to align and insert the file. The second operator, blinded to the device's purpose, performed all insertions under simulated clinical conditions. An intraoral scanner subsequently captured the vertical distance from the stopper's bottom surface to a standardized anatomical landmark. Pairwise comparisons between the two groups were computed using alignment software to account for potential measurement artifacts.Normality in both groups was confirmed via the Shapiro-Wilk test. An independent-samples <i>t</i>-test compared mean vertical distances. Additionally, differences in stopper positioning were calculated for all aligned virtual models in CloudCompare.The device-assisted group exhibited a significantly shorter mean stopper-to-landmark distance (0.425 mm, standard deviation [SD] = 0.225) than the conventional group (0.971 mm, SD = 0.432) (<i>t</i> = -5.014, <i>p</i> = 2.534 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). Pairwise analysis highlighted closer apical positioning in the device-assisted group, closely matching pilot study findings that a 26.57° vertical viewing angle can distort perceptions by 0.5 mm. The device's mean intraoral mounting time was 224 s (SD = 35.2), considered negligible over the full treatment duration.Adopting a horizontal perspective with a novel digital assistive device significantly improved file placement accuracy and reduced operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment. Optimizing this device's design and assessing its cost-effectiveness may facilitate broader clinical adoption and further enhance endodontic procedural outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估在一种新型数字辅助装置的辅助下,采用水平视角是否可以提高根管锉放置的准确性,并减少根管治疗过程中对操作者的依赖性。将改良的上颌牙石模型40个分为两组(n = 20),每组采用一颗塑料牙代替右上第二磨牙。每颗牙的中颊根管标准工作长度为21.0 mm,工作宽度为35。然后插入一个尺寸为40的文件,其塞子预先调整为19.0 mm。在第一组(常规)中,档案在没有帮助的情况下放置;在第二组(设备辅助)中,设计、开发了一个水平视图数字设备,并使用它来对齐和插入文件。第二名操作人员不知道设备的用途,在模拟的临床条件下进行所有插入。随后,口腔内扫描仪捕获了从塞子底表面到标准化解剖地标的垂直距离。使用校准软件计算两组之间的两两比较,以考虑潜在的测量伪影。通过夏皮罗-威尔克检验证实两组正常。独立样本t检验比较平均垂直距离。此外,还计算了CloudCompare中所有对齐虚拟模型的挡板位置差异。器械辅助组的平均止动器到路标的距离(0.425 mm,标准差[SD] = 0.225)明显短于常规组(0.971 mm, SD = 0.432) (t = -5.014, p = 2.534 × 10-5)。两两分析强调了器械辅助组更接近的根尖定位,与前期研究结果密切匹配,即26.57°垂直视角会使感知扭曲0.5 mm。该装置的平均口腔内安装时间为224秒(SD = 35.2),在整个治疗期间可以忽略不计。采用水平视角和新型数字辅助装置显著提高了根管治疗过程中文件放置的准确性,减少了对操作者的依赖性。优化该装置的设计和评估其成本效益可以促进更广泛的临床应用,并进一步提高根管治疗的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a Novel Visualization Device for Improving File Insertion Accuracy During Root Canal Treatment.

This study aimed to evaluate whether adopting a horizontal viewpoint, facilitated by a novel digital assistive device, could enhance endodontic file placement accuracy and reduce operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment.A total of 40 modified upper jaw dental stone models, each accommodating a plastic tooth replacing the upper right second molar, were divided into two groups (n = 20 each). The mesiobuccal canal of each tooth was prepared to a standardized working length of 21.0 mm and a working width of size 35. A size 40 file with a stopper preadjusted to 19.0 mm was then inserted. In the first (conventional) group, files were placed without assistance; in the second (device-assisted) group, a horizontal-view digital device was designed, developed, and used to align and insert the file. The second operator, blinded to the device's purpose, performed all insertions under simulated clinical conditions. An intraoral scanner subsequently captured the vertical distance from the stopper's bottom surface to a standardized anatomical landmark. Pairwise comparisons between the two groups were computed using alignment software to account for potential measurement artifacts.Normality in both groups was confirmed via the Shapiro-Wilk test. An independent-samples t-test compared mean vertical distances. Additionally, differences in stopper positioning were calculated for all aligned virtual models in CloudCompare.The device-assisted group exhibited a significantly shorter mean stopper-to-landmark distance (0.425 mm, standard deviation [SD] = 0.225) than the conventional group (0.971 mm, SD = 0.432) (t = -5.014, p = 2.534 × 10-5). Pairwise analysis highlighted closer apical positioning in the device-assisted group, closely matching pilot study findings that a 26.57° vertical viewing angle can distort perceptions by 0.5 mm. The device's mean intraoral mounting time was 224 s (SD = 35.2), considered negligible over the full treatment duration.Adopting a horizontal perspective with a novel digital assistive device significantly improved file placement accuracy and reduced operator-dependent variability during root canal treatment. Optimizing this device's design and assessing its cost-effectiveness may facilitate broader clinical adoption and further enhance endodontic procedural outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信