Jun Yuan, Rui Qing Zhang, Qiang Guo, Aji Tuerganaili, Ying Mei Shao
{"title":"控制营养状态评分预测肝切除术后肝功能衰竭:一个在线可解释的机器学习预测模型。","authors":"Jun Yuan, Rui Qing Zhang, Qiang Guo, Aji Tuerganaili, Ying Mei Shao","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a severe complication after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and accurate preoperative evaluation and predictive measures are urgently needed. We investigated the impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on PHLF and utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify high-risk individuals of PHLF.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 464 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy were randomized 7 : 2: 1 into the training group ( n = 324), test group ( n = 94), and validation group ( n = 46). In the training group, variables were screened by univariate logistic regression combined with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Models were then developed using nine ML algorithms and the optimal model was interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations and deployed online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PHLF was present in 29 of 324 (8.9%) patients. The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model based on the CONUT score exhibited excellent performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.886-0.967], an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.644 (95% CI: 0.469-0.785), and a Brier score of 0.055 in the training group. And an AUC of 0.703 (95% CI: 0.528-0.879), an AUPRC of 0.420 (95% CI: 0.096-0.703), and a Brier score of 0.091 in the test group. In the validation group, AUC, AUPRC, and Brier score were 0.808 (95% CI: 0.637-0.980), 0.516 (95% CI: 0.086-0.841), and 0.096, respectively. The model was made available online for clinical application (LightGBM for PHLF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CONUT score significantly influences PHLF. The LightGBM model demonstrates the prominent predictive capacity of PHLF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"875-884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling nutritional status score predicts posthepatectomy liver failure: an online interpretable machine learning prediction model.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yuan, Rui Qing Zhang, Qiang Guo, Aji Tuerganaili, Ying Mei Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a severe complication after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and accurate preoperative evaluation and predictive measures are urgently needed. We investigated the impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on PHLF and utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify high-risk individuals of PHLF.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 464 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy were randomized 7 : 2: 1 into the training group ( n = 324), test group ( n = 94), and validation group ( n = 46). In the training group, variables were screened by univariate logistic regression combined with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Models were then developed using nine ML algorithms and the optimal model was interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations and deployed online.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PHLF was present in 29 of 324 (8.9%) patients. The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model based on the CONUT score exhibited excellent performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.886-0.967], an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.644 (95% CI: 0.469-0.785), and a Brier score of 0.055 in the training group. And an AUC of 0.703 (95% CI: 0.528-0.879), an AUPRC of 0.420 (95% CI: 0.096-0.703), and a Brier score of 0.091 in the test group. In the validation group, AUC, AUPRC, and Brier score were 0.808 (95% CI: 0.637-0.980), 0.516 (95% CI: 0.086-0.841), and 0.096, respectively. The model was made available online for clinical application (LightGBM for PHLF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CONUT score significantly influences PHLF. The LightGBM model demonstrates the prominent predictive capacity of PHLF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"875-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Controlling nutritional status score predicts posthepatectomy liver failure: an online interpretable machine learning prediction model.
Background and aims: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a severe complication after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and accurate preoperative evaluation and predictive measures are urgently needed. We investigated the impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on PHLF and utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify high-risk individuals of PHLF.
Method: A total of 464 patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy were randomized 7 : 2: 1 into the training group ( n = 324), test group ( n = 94), and validation group ( n = 46). In the training group, variables were screened by univariate logistic regression combined with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Models were then developed using nine ML algorithms and the optimal model was interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations and deployed online.
Results: PHLF was present in 29 of 324 (8.9%) patients. The light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model based on the CONUT score exhibited excellent performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.886-0.967], an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.644 (95% CI: 0.469-0.785), and a Brier score of 0.055 in the training group. And an AUC of 0.703 (95% CI: 0.528-0.879), an AUPRC of 0.420 (95% CI: 0.096-0.703), and a Brier score of 0.091 in the test group. In the validation group, AUC, AUPRC, and Brier score were 0.808 (95% CI: 0.637-0.980), 0.516 (95% CI: 0.086-0.841), and 0.096, respectively. The model was made available online for clinical application (LightGBM for PHLF).
Conclusion: The CONUT score significantly influences PHLF. The LightGBM model demonstrates the prominent predictive capacity of PHLF.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.