{"title":"特发性肺纤维化死亡率风险预测模型的系统综述。","authors":"Yingxu Wu, Pin Li, Mei Wang, Yongming Liu, Jiapeng Leng, Xuetao Li, Xiaodong Lv, Lijian Pang, Ningzi Zang","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, the factors that contribute to this risk remain unknown. This study aimed to systematically review existing predictive models for IPF-related mortality and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes. <b>Methods</b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies on IPF mortality risk prediction models published between 1 January 1984 and 15 November 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and cross-checked the data. The risk of bias and model applicability were also evaluated. <b>Results</b> A total of 17 risk prediction models were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.728 to 0.907, while the model validation results ranged from 0.750 to 0.920. The concordance index (C-index) of 10 studies was more than 0.7, indicating good predictive performance. This study encompassed a total of 17 risk prediction models incorporating between 3 and 8 combined prognostic variables, with the most frequently included predictors being forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%pred), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%pred), gender, age, six-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and dyspnea severity. <b>Conclusion</b> Current IPF mortality risk prediction models remain in an exploratory phase, with a generally high risk of bias. Furthermore, the lack of external validation in some models limits their generalizability. Future research should focus on improving the applicability of the model to enhance clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 4","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Mortality Risk Prediction Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yingxu Wu, Pin Li, Mei Wang, Yongming Liu, Jiapeng Leng, Xuetao Li, Xiaodong Lv, Lijian Pang, Ningzi Zang\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/hmed.2024.0934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, the factors that contribute to this risk remain unknown. This study aimed to systematically review existing predictive models for IPF-related mortality and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes. <b>Methods</b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies on IPF mortality risk prediction models published between 1 January 1984 and 15 November 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and cross-checked the data. The risk of bias and model applicability were also evaluated. <b>Results</b> A total of 17 risk prediction models were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.728 to 0.907, while the model validation results ranged from 0.750 to 0.920. The concordance index (C-index) of 10 studies was more than 0.7, indicating good predictive performance. This study encompassed a total of 17 risk prediction models incorporating between 3 and 8 combined prognostic variables, with the most frequently included predictors being forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%pred), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%pred), gender, age, six-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and dyspnea severity. <b>Conclusion</b> Current IPF mortality risk prediction models remain in an exploratory phase, with a generally high risk of bias. Furthermore, the lack of external validation in some models limits their generalizability. Future research should focus on improving the applicability of the model to enhance clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"86 4\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0934\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/背景特发性肺纤维化(IPF)与死亡风险增加相关。然而,导致这种风险的因素仍然未知。本研究旨在系统地回顾现有的ipf相关死亡率预测模型,并评估与患者预后相关的预后因素。方法在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase数据库中检索1984年1月1日至2024年11月15日发表的IPF死亡率风险预测模型的相关文献。两名独立的审稿人对数据进行筛选、提取和交叉检查。还对偏倚风险和模型适用性进行了评估。结果共识别出17种风险预测模型。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.728 ~ 0.907,模型验证结果范围为0.750 ~ 0.920。10项研究的一致性指数(C-index)大于0.7,具有较好的预测效果。该研究共包含17个风险预测模型,其中包含3到8个联合预后变量,最常见的预测变量是强制肺活量占预测值的百分比(FVC%pred)、一氧化碳扩散能力占预测值的百分比(DLCO%pred)、性别、年龄、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)结果和呼吸困难严重程度。结论目前IPF死亡率风险预测模型仍处于探索阶段,普遍存在较高的偏倚风险。此外,一些模型缺乏外部验证限制了它们的泛化性。未来的研究应着眼于提高模型的适用性,以提高临床应用水平。
A Systematic Review of Mortality Risk Prediction Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Aims/Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, the factors that contribute to this risk remain unknown. This study aimed to systematically review existing predictive models for IPF-related mortality and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies on IPF mortality risk prediction models published between 1 January 1984 and 15 November 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and cross-checked the data. The risk of bias and model applicability were also evaluated. Results A total of 17 risk prediction models were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.728 to 0.907, while the model validation results ranged from 0.750 to 0.920. The concordance index (C-index) of 10 studies was more than 0.7, indicating good predictive performance. This study encompassed a total of 17 risk prediction models incorporating between 3 and 8 combined prognostic variables, with the most frequently included predictors being forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%pred), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%pred), gender, age, six-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and dyspnea severity. Conclusion Current IPF mortality risk prediction models remain in an exploratory phase, with a generally high risk of bias. Furthermore, the lack of external validation in some models limits their generalizability. Future research should focus on improving the applicability of the model to enhance clinical application.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training.
The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career.
The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.