Zhuang Aobo, Zhou Xiao, Xu Chengfei, Xi Zhe, Chen Yingxue, Zhang Chenhe, Xie Fuan, Yang Fan, Xiao Mengmeng, Ye Feng, Li Wengang
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂联合蒽环类药物作为去分化脂肪肉瘤的潜在一线治疗方案:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Zhuang Aobo, Zhou Xiao, Xu Chengfei, Xi Zhe, Chen Yingxue, Zhang Chenhe, Xie Fuan, Yang Fan, Xiao Mengmeng, Ye Feng, Li Wengang","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-04007-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the only potentially curative treatment for localized DDLPS, the recurrence rate remains high, and systemic chemotherapy, typically anthracycline-based, shows limited efficacy in advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in various sarcoma subtypes, including DDLPS, their role as a first-line treatment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in treating patients with DDLPS. A total of 25 studies encompassing 245 patients were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and grade III-V treatment-related adverse events were analyzed. We assessed treatment efficacy based on the line of therapy and treatment regimens, including ICI monotherapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI combinations with other modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled ORR for all ICI-based treatments was 7%. First-line ICI therapy yielded a significantly higher ORR of 22%, compared to 4% in later-line treatment. The combination of ICI with anthracyclines demonstrated the highest ORR of 52%. In contrast, ICI regimens combined with trabectedin or other agents showed limited efficacy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results, and publication bias was not detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the potential role of ICIs, particularly in combination with anthracyclines, as a first-line therapeutic strategy for DDLPS. These results provide a foundation for future prospective studies aimed at optimizing immunotherapy approaches for this rare and challenging malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 6","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anthracyclines as a potential first-line regimen for dedifferentiated liposarcoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhuang Aobo, Zhou Xiao, Xu Chengfei, Xi Zhe, Chen Yingxue, Zhang Chenhe, Xie Fuan, Yang Fan, Xiao Mengmeng, Ye Feng, Li Wengang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00262-025-04007-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the only potentially curative treatment for localized DDLPS, the recurrence rate remains high, and systemic chemotherapy, typically anthracycline-based, shows limited efficacy in advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in various sarcoma subtypes, including DDLPS, their role as a first-line treatment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in treating patients with DDLPS. A total of 25 studies encompassing 245 patients were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and grade III-V treatment-related adverse events were analyzed. We assessed treatment efficacy based on the line of therapy and treatment regimens, including ICI monotherapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI combinations with other modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled ORR for all ICI-based treatments was 7%. First-line ICI therapy yielded a significantly higher ORR of 22%, compared to 4% in later-line treatment. The combination of ICI with anthracyclines demonstrated the highest ORR of 52%. In contrast, ICI regimens combined with trabectedin or other agents showed limited efficacy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results, and publication bias was not detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the potential role of ICIs, particularly in combination with anthracyclines, as a first-line therapeutic strategy for DDLPS. These results provide a foundation for future prospective studies aimed at optimizing immunotherapy approaches for this rare and challenging malignancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"74 6\",\"pages\":\"179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04007-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04007-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anthracyclines as a potential first-line regimen for dedifferentiated liposarcoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the only potentially curative treatment for localized DDLPS, the recurrence rate remains high, and systemic chemotherapy, typically anthracycline-based, shows limited efficacy in advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in various sarcoma subtypes, including DDLPS, their role as a first-line treatment remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in treating patients with DDLPS. A total of 25 studies encompassing 245 patients were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and grade III-V treatment-related adverse events were analyzed. We assessed treatment efficacy based on the line of therapy and treatment regimens, including ICI monotherapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI combinations with other modalities.
Results: The pooled ORR for all ICI-based treatments was 7%. First-line ICI therapy yielded a significantly higher ORR of 22%, compared to 4% in later-line treatment. The combination of ICI with anthracyclines demonstrated the highest ORR of 52%. In contrast, ICI regimens combined with trabectedin or other agents showed limited efficacy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results, and publication bias was not detected.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the potential role of ICIs, particularly in combination with anthracyclines, as a first-line therapeutic strategy for DDLPS. These results provide a foundation for future prospective studies aimed at optimizing immunotherapy approaches for this rare and challenging malignancy.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions.
The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.