选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂治疗成人强迫症的安慰剂对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析

Sem E. Cohen, Bram W. Storosum, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Taina K. Mattila, Anthonius de Boer, Damiaan Denys
{"title":"选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂治疗成人强迫症的安慰剂对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析","authors":"Sem E. Cohen, Bram W. Storosum, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Taina K. Mattila, Anthonius de Boer, Damiaan Denys","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the preferred pharmacological treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). However, insufficient response is common and it remains unclear whether specific patient-level factors influence the likelihood of treatment response.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To determine the efficacy and acceptability of SSRIs in adult OCD, and to identify patient-level modifiers of efficacy.</p><span>Methods</span><p>We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of industry-sponsored short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled SSRI trials submitted for approval to the Dutch regulatory agency to obtain marketing approval for treating OCD in adults. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis, using crude data of available trials. The primary outcome was the difference in Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) change between active treatment and placebo. Secondary outcomes were differences in response (defined as the odds ratio of ≥35% YBOCS point reduction) and acceptability (defined as the odds ratio for all-cause discontinuation). We examined the modifying effect of baseline characteristics: age, gender, illness severity, depressive symptoms, weight, illness duration and history of antidepressant use.</p><span>Results</span><p>After excluding three trials because of missing data, we analysed results from 11 trials (79% of all submitted trials, <span>n</span> = 2372). The trial duration ranged from 10 to 13 weeks. Mean difference of SSRIs relative to placebo was 2.65 YBOCS points (95% CI 1.85–3.46, <span>p</span> &lt; 0.0001), equalling a small effect size (0.33 Hedges’ <span>g</span>). The odds ratio for response was 2.21 in favour of active treatment (95% CI 1.72–2.83, <span>p</span> &lt; 0.0001), with a number needed to treat of seven. Patient characteristics did not modify symptom change or response. Acceptability was comparable for SSRIs and placebo.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Our IPDMA showed that SSRIs are well accepted and superior to placebo for treating OCD. The effects are modest and independent of baseline patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors submitted for regulatory approval in adult obsessive–compulsive disorder\",\"authors\":\"Sem E. Cohen, Bram W. Storosum, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Taina K. Mattila, Anthonius de Boer, Damiaan Denys\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2025.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Background</span><p>Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the preferred pharmacological treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). However, insufficient response is common and it remains unclear whether specific patient-level factors influence the likelihood of treatment response.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To determine the efficacy and acceptability of SSRIs in adult OCD, and to identify patient-level modifiers of efficacy.</p><span>Methods</span><p>We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of industry-sponsored short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled SSRI trials submitted for approval to the Dutch regulatory agency to obtain marketing approval for treating OCD in adults. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis, using crude data of available trials. The primary outcome was the difference in Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) change between active treatment and placebo. Secondary outcomes were differences in response (defined as the odds ratio of ≥35% YBOCS point reduction) and acceptability (defined as the odds ratio for all-cause discontinuation). We examined the modifying effect of baseline characteristics: age, gender, illness severity, depressive symptoms, weight, illness duration and history of antidepressant use.</p><span>Results</span><p>After excluding three trials because of missing data, we analysed results from 11 trials (79% of all submitted trials, <span>n</span> = 2372). The trial duration ranged from 10 to 13 weeks. Mean difference of SSRIs relative to placebo was 2.65 YBOCS points (95% CI 1.85–3.46, <span>p</span> &lt; 0.0001), equalling a small effect size (0.33 Hedges’ <span>g</span>). The odds ratio for response was 2.21 in favour of active treatment (95% CI 1.72–2.83, <span>p</span> &lt; 0.0001), with a number needed to treat of seven. Patient characteristics did not modify symptom change or response. Acceptability was comparable for SSRIs and placebo.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Our IPDMA showed that SSRIs are well accepted and superior to placebo for treating OCD. The effects are modest and independent of baseline patient characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是强迫症(OCD)的首选药物治疗。然而,反应不足是常见的,目前尚不清楚特定的患者水平因素是否会影响治疗反应的可能性。目的确定SSRIs治疗成人强迫症的疗效和可接受性,并确定患者水平的疗效调节剂。方法:我们对行业资助的短期、随机、安慰剂对照SSRI试验进行了个体患者数据荟萃分析(IPDMA),这些试验已提交荷兰监管机构批准,以获得治疗成人强迫症的上市许可。我们使用现有试验的原始数据进行了两阶段的荟萃分析。主要结果为积极治疗组与安慰剂组之间耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)变化的差异。次要结局是反应(定义为YBOCS点数降低≥35%的优势比)和可接受性(定义为全因停药的优势比)的差异。我们检查了基线特征的修改作用:年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、抑郁症状、体重、疾病持续时间和抗抑郁药使用史。在因数据缺失而排除3项试验后,我们分析了11项试验的结果(占所有提交试验的79%,n = 2372)。试验期10 ~ 13周。ssri类药物与安慰剂的平均差异为2.65 YBOCS点(95% CI 1.85-3.46, p <;0.0001),相当于较小的效应大小(0.33对冲系数)。响应的优势比为2.21,支持积极治疗(95% CI 1.72-2.83, p <;0.0001),需要一个数字来治疗7。患者特征不改变症状改变或反应。SSRIs和安慰剂的可接受性相当。结论IPDMA显示ssri类药物治疗强迫症的可接受性好,且优于安慰剂。这种效果是适度的,与患者的基线特征无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors submitted for regulatory approval in adult obsessive–compulsive disorder
Background

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the preferred pharmacological treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). However, insufficient response is common and it remains unclear whether specific patient-level factors influence the likelihood of treatment response.

Aims

To determine the efficacy and acceptability of SSRIs in adult OCD, and to identify patient-level modifiers of efficacy.

Methods

We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of industry-sponsored short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled SSRI trials submitted for approval to the Dutch regulatory agency to obtain marketing approval for treating OCD in adults. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis, using crude data of available trials. The primary outcome was the difference in Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) change between active treatment and placebo. Secondary outcomes were differences in response (defined as the odds ratio of ≥35% YBOCS point reduction) and acceptability (defined as the odds ratio for all-cause discontinuation). We examined the modifying effect of baseline characteristics: age, gender, illness severity, depressive symptoms, weight, illness duration and history of antidepressant use.

Results

After excluding three trials because of missing data, we analysed results from 11 trials (79% of all submitted trials, n = 2372). The trial duration ranged from 10 to 13 weeks. Mean difference of SSRIs relative to placebo was 2.65 YBOCS points (95% CI 1.85–3.46, p < 0.0001), equalling a small effect size (0.33 Hedges’ g). The odds ratio for response was 2.21 in favour of active treatment (95% CI 1.72–2.83, p < 0.0001), with a number needed to treat of seven. Patient characteristics did not modify symptom change or response. Acceptability was comparable for SSRIs and placebo.

Conclusions

Our IPDMA showed that SSRIs are well accepted and superior to placebo for treating OCD. The effects are modest and independent of baseline patient characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信