Khalid A Alnaqbi, Mohammed Alaswad, Amr A A Mahmoud, Suad Hannawi
{"title":"风湿病患者转诊到其他医疗保健专业人员的转诊模式、影响因素和满意度:风湿病学家的在线调查","authors":"Khalid A Alnaqbi, Mohammed Alaswad, Amr A A Mahmoud, Suad Hannawi","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05889-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing rheumatic diseases requires teamwork, but referral patterns and challenges remain poorly understood. This study explored rheumatologists' perspectives on referral patterns in the Gulf countries. We conducted a web-based, 21-question cross-sectional survey between November and December 2024, collecting data on rheumatologists' demographics, referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction. Participants were recruited through email invitations, WhatsApp groups and snowball sampling. Statistical analyses included descriptive and inferential methods, such as subgroup comparisons and logistic regression, to identify predictors of referral frequency and satisfaction. A total of 149 rheumatologists participated, with 58.4% being consultants. Approximately 55% had up to 10 years of post-training experience. The primary referral method was electronic health records (EHR) (84.8%). In the three months preceding the survey, 36.3% made 0-10 referrals, while 35.6% made over 20. Dermatology (85.5%) and physiotherapy (79.5%) were the most referred specialties, aligning with psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus as the most referred diseases. Most rheumatologists (78%) often or always followed up on referrals, and 37.4% reported moderate changes in their referral decision-making over time. Key influences on referral decisions included patient-, practice-, and diagnostic-related factors. Patient gender preference had no impact. Multidisciplinary meetings (78.2%), access to updated clinical guidelines (76.5%), attending multidisciplinary continuing medical education or training programs (67.2%), and improved EHR referral systems (64.7%) were the top resources for improving referrals. Satisfaction post-referral was affected by various factors such as patients' experiences post-referral (61.5%), and healthcare professionals' responsiveness to their questions (54.2%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, employment status, practice setting, and geographical location were associated with referral decisions. This study is the first to provide valuable insights into referral practices among Gulf rheumatologists, identifying key influencing factors and areas for improvement. Findings suggest that enhancing EHR systems, multidisciplinary meetings, and clinical guidelines can optimize referrals and interdisciplinary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 5","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction related to referrals of patients with rheumatic diseases to other healthcare professionals: an online survey of rheumatologists.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid A Alnaqbi, Mohammed Alaswad, Amr A A Mahmoud, Suad Hannawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05889-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Managing rheumatic diseases requires teamwork, but referral patterns and challenges remain poorly understood. This study explored rheumatologists' perspectives on referral patterns in the Gulf countries. We conducted a web-based, 21-question cross-sectional survey between November and December 2024, collecting data on rheumatologists' demographics, referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction. Participants were recruited through email invitations, WhatsApp groups and snowball sampling. Statistical analyses included descriptive and inferential methods, such as subgroup comparisons and logistic regression, to identify predictors of referral frequency and satisfaction. A total of 149 rheumatologists participated, with 58.4% being consultants. Approximately 55% had up to 10 years of post-training experience. The primary referral method was electronic health records (EHR) (84.8%). In the three months preceding the survey, 36.3% made 0-10 referrals, while 35.6% made over 20. Dermatology (85.5%) and physiotherapy (79.5%) were the most referred specialties, aligning with psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus as the most referred diseases. Most rheumatologists (78%) often or always followed up on referrals, and 37.4% reported moderate changes in their referral decision-making over time. Key influences on referral decisions included patient-, practice-, and diagnostic-related factors. Patient gender preference had no impact. Multidisciplinary meetings (78.2%), access to updated clinical guidelines (76.5%), attending multidisciplinary continuing medical education or training programs (67.2%), and improved EHR referral systems (64.7%) were the top resources for improving referrals. Satisfaction post-referral was affected by various factors such as patients' experiences post-referral (61.5%), and healthcare professionals' responsiveness to their questions (54.2%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, employment status, practice setting, and geographical location were associated with referral decisions. This study is the first to provide valuable insights into referral practices among Gulf rheumatologists, identifying key influencing factors and areas for improvement. Findings suggest that enhancing EHR systems, multidisciplinary meetings, and clinical guidelines can optimize referrals and interdisciplinary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05889-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05889-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction related to referrals of patients with rheumatic diseases to other healthcare professionals: an online survey of rheumatologists.
Managing rheumatic diseases requires teamwork, but referral patterns and challenges remain poorly understood. This study explored rheumatologists' perspectives on referral patterns in the Gulf countries. We conducted a web-based, 21-question cross-sectional survey between November and December 2024, collecting data on rheumatologists' demographics, referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction. Participants were recruited through email invitations, WhatsApp groups and snowball sampling. Statistical analyses included descriptive and inferential methods, such as subgroup comparisons and logistic regression, to identify predictors of referral frequency and satisfaction. A total of 149 rheumatologists participated, with 58.4% being consultants. Approximately 55% had up to 10 years of post-training experience. The primary referral method was electronic health records (EHR) (84.8%). In the three months preceding the survey, 36.3% made 0-10 referrals, while 35.6% made over 20. Dermatology (85.5%) and physiotherapy (79.5%) were the most referred specialties, aligning with psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus as the most referred diseases. Most rheumatologists (78%) often or always followed up on referrals, and 37.4% reported moderate changes in their referral decision-making over time. Key influences on referral decisions included patient-, practice-, and diagnostic-related factors. Patient gender preference had no impact. Multidisciplinary meetings (78.2%), access to updated clinical guidelines (76.5%), attending multidisciplinary continuing medical education or training programs (67.2%), and improved EHR referral systems (64.7%) were the top resources for improving referrals. Satisfaction post-referral was affected by various factors such as patients' experiences post-referral (61.5%), and healthcare professionals' responsiveness to their questions (54.2%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, employment status, practice setting, and geographical location were associated with referral decisions. This study is the first to provide valuable insights into referral practices among Gulf rheumatologists, identifying key influencing factors and areas for improvement. Findings suggest that enhancing EHR systems, multidisciplinary meetings, and clinical guidelines can optimize referrals and interdisciplinary care.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.