Kasper Yde Jensen, Per Aagaard, Charlotte Suetta, Jakob Lindberg Nielsen, Rune Dueholm Bech, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Jan Christensen, Casper Simonsen, Louise Pyndt Diederichsen
{"title":"肌炎患者的高强度阻力训练- 1年随机对照试验随访。","authors":"Kasper Yde Jensen, Per Aagaard, Charlotte Suetta, Jakob Lindberg Nielsen, Rune Dueholm Bech, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Jan Christensen, Casper Simonsen, Louise Pyndt Diederichsen","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05858-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reduced quality of life in patients with myositis is partly due to impairments in muscle strength, muscle endurance and functional capacity. In a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT04486261) we showed that high-intensity resistance training improved quality of life, muscle strength, and endurance. This follow-up study aimed to investigate if these improvements remained persistent one year after completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training. A total of 32 participants (intervention group (IG): 15; control group (CG): 17) were enrolled in the RCT, with 27 (IG: 13; CG: 14) completing the 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at three time points: baseline (weeks - 4 - 0), post-intervention (weeks 17-18), and 1-year follow-up (weeks 52-54). Outcomes included quality of life (QoL, SF36), functional capacity, muscle endurance (functional index 3 (FI3)), body composition (DEXA), and disease activity/damage, including manual muscle test 8 (MMT8). Training-induced improvements in muscle endurance (FI3) remained at 1-year follow-up, with a mean change of 10.7 (CI95: 2.2;19.1) in favour of IG (p = 0.01). Within-group improvements in IG were sustained for QoL (SF36, physical component summary) (4.8 (CI95: 0.9;8.7), p = 0.02), muscle strength (MMT8) (1.8 (CI95: 0.8; 2.9), p < 0.01), and functional capacity measures (p ≤ 0.04), although not significantly different from CG at 1-year follow-up. Disease activity and disease damage were similar between IG and CG at 1-year follow-up. Patients with myositis completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training showed sustained improvements in muscle endurance at 1-year follow-up compared to controls. Indications of lasting enhancements in quality of life and strength were also present, with no increase in disease activity or damage. NCT04486261.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 5","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-intensity resistance training in patients with myositis - 1-year follow-up on a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kasper Yde Jensen, Per Aagaard, Charlotte Suetta, Jakob Lindberg Nielsen, Rune Dueholm Bech, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Jan Christensen, Casper Simonsen, Louise Pyndt Diederichsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05858-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reduced quality of life in patients with myositis is partly due to impairments in muscle strength, muscle endurance and functional capacity. In a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT04486261) we showed that high-intensity resistance training improved quality of life, muscle strength, and endurance. This follow-up study aimed to investigate if these improvements remained persistent one year after completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training. A total of 32 participants (intervention group (IG): 15; control group (CG): 17) were enrolled in the RCT, with 27 (IG: 13; CG: 14) completing the 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at three time points: baseline (weeks - 4 - 0), post-intervention (weeks 17-18), and 1-year follow-up (weeks 52-54). Outcomes included quality of life (QoL, SF36), functional capacity, muscle endurance (functional index 3 (FI3)), body composition (DEXA), and disease activity/damage, including manual muscle test 8 (MMT8). Training-induced improvements in muscle endurance (FI3) remained at 1-year follow-up, with a mean change of 10.7 (CI95: 2.2;19.1) in favour of IG (p = 0.01). Within-group improvements in IG were sustained for QoL (SF36, physical component summary) (4.8 (CI95: 0.9;8.7), p = 0.02), muscle strength (MMT8) (1.8 (CI95: 0.8; 2.9), p < 0.01), and functional capacity measures (p ≤ 0.04), although not significantly different from CG at 1-year follow-up. Disease activity and disease damage were similar between IG and CG at 1-year follow-up. Patients with myositis completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training showed sustained improvements in muscle endurance at 1-year follow-up compared to controls. Indications of lasting enhancements in quality of life and strength were also present, with no increase in disease activity or damage. NCT04486261.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05858-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05858-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-intensity resistance training in patients with myositis - 1-year follow-up on a randomised controlled trial.
Reduced quality of life in patients with myositis is partly due to impairments in muscle strength, muscle endurance and functional capacity. In a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT04486261) we showed that high-intensity resistance training improved quality of life, muscle strength, and endurance. This follow-up study aimed to investigate if these improvements remained persistent one year after completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training. A total of 32 participants (intervention group (IG): 15; control group (CG): 17) were enrolled in the RCT, with 27 (IG: 13; CG: 14) completing the 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at three time points: baseline (weeks - 4 - 0), post-intervention (weeks 17-18), and 1-year follow-up (weeks 52-54). Outcomes included quality of life (QoL, SF36), functional capacity, muscle endurance (functional index 3 (FI3)), body composition (DEXA), and disease activity/damage, including manual muscle test 8 (MMT8). Training-induced improvements in muscle endurance (FI3) remained at 1-year follow-up, with a mean change of 10.7 (CI95: 2.2;19.1) in favour of IG (p = 0.01). Within-group improvements in IG were sustained for QoL (SF36, physical component summary) (4.8 (CI95: 0.9;8.7), p = 0.02), muscle strength (MMT8) (1.8 (CI95: 0.8; 2.9), p < 0.01), and functional capacity measures (p ≤ 0.04), although not significantly different from CG at 1-year follow-up. Disease activity and disease damage were similar between IG and CG at 1-year follow-up. Patients with myositis completing 16 weeks of high-intensity resistance training showed sustained improvements in muscle endurance at 1-year follow-up compared to controls. Indications of lasting enhancements in quality of life and strength were also present, with no increase in disease activity or damage. NCT04486261.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.