超声引导下经皮消融bbb50 vs≤5结直肠肝转移的结果:倾向评分匹配研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128
Jingwen Zhou, Si Qin, Rui Cui, Yao Chen, Yimin Wang, Guangjian Liu
{"title":"超声引导下经皮消融bbb50 vs≤5结直肠肝转移的结果:倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Jingwen Zhou, Si Qin, Rui Cui, Yao Chen, Yimin Wang, Guangjian Liu","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with 1-5 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) <i>versus</i> those with 6-9 CRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with 1-9 CRLM, who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between January 2018 and May 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance potential bias between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 264 patients were included in the analysis. After PSM, there were 43 and 75 patients in the CRLM >5 and ≤5 groups, respectively. Even with higher tumor burden and technical difficulty, there was no statistical difference in the local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival (LTPFS) between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients with an ablation margin (AM) ≤5 mm exhibited a significantly higher rate of LTP than those with AM >5 mm in both groups(<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients with 6-9 CRLM experienced a higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence (iHR) (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) at any site (<i>p</i> < 0.05). CRLM > 5 is an independent risk factor for poor PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.008). The minor complication rate was lower in the CRLM ≤ 5 group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the major complication rate showed no difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the number of CRLM was limited to 9, single-session MWA was feasible and safe for radical local treatment. An AM >5 mm was critical for local tumor control. Compared with patients with 1-5 CRLM, those with 6-9 CRLM experienced inferior PFS at any site, which mainly lies in more iHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"42 1","pages":"2488128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of >5 <i>versus</i> ≤ 5 colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Jingwen Zhou, Si Qin, Rui Cui, Yao Chen, Yimin Wang, Guangjian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with 1-5 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) <i>versus</i> those with 6-9 CRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with 1-9 CRLM, who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between January 2018 and May 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance potential bias between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 264 patients were included in the analysis. After PSM, there were 43 and 75 patients in the CRLM >5 and ≤5 groups, respectively. Even with higher tumor burden and technical difficulty, there was no statistical difference in the local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival (LTPFS) between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients with an ablation margin (AM) ≤5 mm exhibited a significantly higher rate of LTP than those with AM >5 mm in both groups(<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients with 6-9 CRLM experienced a higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence (iHR) (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) at any site (<i>p</i> < 0.05). CRLM > 5 is an independent risk factor for poor PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.008). The minor complication rate was lower in the CRLM ≤ 5 group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the major complication rate showed no difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the number of CRLM was limited to 9, single-session MWA was feasible and safe for radical local treatment. An AM >5 mm was critical for local tumor control. Compared with patients with 1-5 CRLM, those with 6-9 CRLM experienced inferior PFS at any site, which mainly lies in more iHR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"2488128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hyperthermia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2488128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨微波消融(MWA)治疗1 ~ 5例结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者与6 ~ 9例结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年5月期间接受超声引导下经皮MWA治疗的1-9例CRLM患者的数据。采用1:2的倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡组间的潜在偏倚。结果:264例患者的数据被纳入分析。经PSM后,CRLM bb0 5组43例,≤5组75例。尽管肿瘤负担和技术难度较高,但两组局部肿瘤进展(LTP)无生存(LTPFS)差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组消融边缘≤5mm的患者LTP发生率均显著高于消融边缘≤5mm的患者(p p = 0.041),且任何部位的无进展生存期(PFS)均较短(p 5是PFS差的独立危险因素(p = 0.008)。CRLM≤5组轻微并发症发生率较低(p < 0.05)。结论:当CRLM数量限制在9个时,单次MWA对于根治性局部治疗是可行且安全的。AM bbb50 mm对局部肿瘤控制至关重要。与1-5级CRLM患者相比,6-9级CRLM患者各部位PFS均较差,主要表现为iHR较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of >5 versus ≤ 5 colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matching study.

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with 1-5 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) versus those with 6-9 CRLM.

Methods: Data from patients with 1-9 CRLM, who underwent ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous MWA between January 2018 and May 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance potential bias between the groups.

Results: Data from 264 patients were included in the analysis. After PSM, there were 43 and 75 patients in the CRLM >5 and ≤5 groups, respectively. Even with higher tumor burden and technical difficulty, there was no statistical difference in the local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival (LTPFS) between the groups (p > 0.05). Patients with an ablation margin (AM) ≤5 mm exhibited a significantly higher rate of LTP than those with AM >5 mm in both groups(p < 0.05). Patients with 6-9 CRLM experienced a higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence (iHR) (p = 0.041) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) at any site (p < 0.05). CRLM > 5 is an independent risk factor for poor PFS (p = 0.008). The minor complication rate was lower in the CRLM ≤ 5 group (p < 0.05) and the major complication rate showed no difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: When the number of CRLM was limited to 9, single-session MWA was feasible and safe for radical local treatment. An AM >5 mm was critical for local tumor control. Compared with patients with 1-5 CRLM, those with 6-9 CRLM experienced inferior PFS at any site, which mainly lies in more iHR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信