基于甲基化的检测诊断良恶性黑色素细胞瘤。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Wen-Wen Zhang, Long-Feng Ke, Yu Chen, Chen-Yu Wu, Shu-Yi Lu, Yun-Li Xie, Huan-Huan Zhu, Hao Chen, Gang Chen, Yan-Ping Chen
{"title":"基于甲基化的检测诊断良恶性黑色素细胞瘤。","authors":"Wen-Wen Zhang, Long-Feng Ke, Yu Chen, Chen-Yu Wu, Shu-Yi Lu, Yun-Li Xie, Huan-Huan Zhu, Hao Chen, Gang Chen, Yan-Ping Chen","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate diagnosis of melanoma significantly improves patient survival rates. Distinguishing melanomas from naevi purely by morphology can be challenging when neoplastic cells are confined to the epidermis or lack marked nuclear pleomorphism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate candidate DNA methylation alterations that can distinguish melanoma from naevus; to develop an efficient and convenient methylation-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (MS-qPCR) for the diagnosis of melanoma; and to validate the diagnostic performance of the MS-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 145 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) samples of malignant melanoma, 143 FFPE samples of benign naevus, 31 plasma samples from patients with melanoma and 37 plasma samples from healthy control skin between March 2018 and July 2024. The FFPE samples were divided into a discovery set, a training set and a validation set. PRAME, CLDN11 and SHOX2 promoter methylation levels were detected in the discovery set by pyrosequencing, to identify melanoma-specific methylation markers. Using these genes, we developed an efficient and convenient MS-qPCR diagnostic model and validated its diagnostic performance in the training set, validation set and plasma samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pyrosequencing in the discovery set showed that PRAME and CLDN11 promoter methylation levels were significant diagnostic biomarkers of melanoma; no significant differences in SHOX2 promoter methylation were found between melanoma and naevi. MS-qPCR for the detection of PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels was established. A diagnostic algorithm based on cycle threshold values was constructed and achieved high accuracy in the training set (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 85.6%), validation set (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 88.7%) and plasma samples (sensitivity 51.6%, specificity 83.8%). In terms of melanoma subtypes, the diagnostic algorithm enabled a high degree of discrimination between acral (sensitivity 89.9%, specificity 86.4%) and mucosal melanoma (sensitivity 100%, specificity 83.3%). More importantly, the diagnostic algorithm was able to distinguish early-stage melanoma from normal naevus, with an area under the curve of 0.879 and sensitivity of 77.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The approach to detecting PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels using MS-qPCR has high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic tumours. Using this approach in plasma is a promising and easily implementable strategy for early melanoma screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"480-489"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methylation-based test for diagnosis of benign and malignant melanocytoma.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Wen Zhang, Long-Feng Ke, Yu Chen, Chen-Yu Wu, Shu-Yi Lu, Yun-Li Xie, Huan-Huan Zhu, Hao Chen, Gang Chen, Yan-Ping Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjd/ljaf169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate diagnosis of melanoma significantly improves patient survival rates. Distinguishing melanomas from naevi purely by morphology can be challenging when neoplastic cells are confined to the epidermis or lack marked nuclear pleomorphism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate candidate DNA methylation alterations that can distinguish melanoma from naevus; to develop an efficient and convenient methylation-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (MS-qPCR) for the diagnosis of melanoma; and to validate the diagnostic performance of the MS-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 145 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) samples of malignant melanoma, 143 FFPE samples of benign naevus, 31 plasma samples from patients with melanoma and 37 plasma samples from healthy control skin between March 2018 and July 2024. The FFPE samples were divided into a discovery set, a training set and a validation set. PRAME, CLDN11 and SHOX2 promoter methylation levels were detected in the discovery set by pyrosequencing, to identify melanoma-specific methylation markers. Using these genes, we developed an efficient and convenient MS-qPCR diagnostic model and validated its diagnostic performance in the training set, validation set and plasma samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pyrosequencing in the discovery set showed that PRAME and CLDN11 promoter methylation levels were significant diagnostic biomarkers of melanoma; no significant differences in SHOX2 promoter methylation were found between melanoma and naevi. MS-qPCR for the detection of PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels was established. A diagnostic algorithm based on cycle threshold values was constructed and achieved high accuracy in the training set (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 85.6%), validation set (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 88.7%) and plasma samples (sensitivity 51.6%, specificity 83.8%). In terms of melanoma subtypes, the diagnostic algorithm enabled a high degree of discrimination between acral (sensitivity 89.9%, specificity 86.4%) and mucosal melanoma (sensitivity 100%, specificity 83.3%). More importantly, the diagnostic algorithm was able to distinguish early-stage melanoma from normal naevus, with an area under the curve of 0.879 and sensitivity of 77.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The approach to detecting PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels using MS-qPCR has high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic tumours. Using this approach in plasma is a promising and easily implementable strategy for early melanoma screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"480-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf169\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑色素瘤的准确诊断可显著提高患者的生存率。当肿瘤细胞局限于表皮或缺乏明显的核多形性时,病理学家仅通过形态学来区分黑素瘤和痣是具有挑战性的。目的:研究能够区分黑色素瘤和痣的候选DNA甲基化改变,建立一种高效、便捷的甲基化特异性定量实时PCR (MS-qPCR)诊断黑色素瘤的方法,并验证其诊断性能。方法:收集2018年3月至2024年7月期间,恶性黑色素瘤经福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织(FFPE)标本145份,良性痣FFPE标本143份,黑色素瘤血浆标本31份,健康对照血浆标本37份。将FFPE样本分为发现集、训练集和验证集。通过焦磷酸测序在发现集中检测PRAME、CLDN11和shox2启动子甲基化水平,以鉴定黑色素瘤特异性甲基化标记。利用统计学差异的基因,我们建立了一种高效便捷的MS-qPCR诊断模型,并在训练集、验证集和血浆样本中验证了其诊断性能。结果:发现集中的焦磷酸测序显示PRAME和CLDN11启动子甲基化水平是黑色素瘤的重要诊断生物标志物;SHOX2启动子甲基化在黑色素瘤和痣之间没有显著差异。建立了用于检测PRAME和cldn11甲基化水平的MS-qPCR,可以对稀释率低至1%的样品进行定量分析。构建基于CT值的诊断算法,在训练集(灵敏度=94.25%,特异度=85.56%)、验证集(灵敏度=84.48%,特异度=88.68%)和血浆样本(灵敏度=51.61%,特异度=83.78%)中均取得了较高的准确率。就不同亚型而言,该诊断算法对肢端黑色素瘤(灵敏度为89.90%,特异性为86.36%)和粘膜黑色素瘤(灵敏度为100%,特异性为83.3%)的鉴别程度较高。更重要的是,该诊断算法能够将早期黑色素瘤与正常痣区分开来,AUC为0.879,敏感性为77.27%。结论:MS-qPCR检测PRAME和CLDN11甲基化水平的方法在良恶性黑色素细胞肿瘤鉴别诊断中具有较高的敏感性和特异性。在血浆中使用这种方法是一种很有前途且易于实施的黑色素瘤早期筛查策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methylation-based test for diagnosis of benign and malignant melanocytoma.

Background: The accurate diagnosis of melanoma significantly improves patient survival rates. Distinguishing melanomas from naevi purely by morphology can be challenging when neoplastic cells are confined to the epidermis or lack marked nuclear pleomorphism.

Objectives: To investigate candidate DNA methylation alterations that can distinguish melanoma from naevus; to develop an efficient and convenient methylation-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (MS-qPCR) for the diagnosis of melanoma; and to validate the diagnostic performance of the MS-qPCR.

Methods: We collected 145 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) samples of malignant melanoma, 143 FFPE samples of benign naevus, 31 plasma samples from patients with melanoma and 37 plasma samples from healthy control skin between March 2018 and July 2024. The FFPE samples were divided into a discovery set, a training set and a validation set. PRAME, CLDN11 and SHOX2 promoter methylation levels were detected in the discovery set by pyrosequencing, to identify melanoma-specific methylation markers. Using these genes, we developed an efficient and convenient MS-qPCR diagnostic model and validated its diagnostic performance in the training set, validation set and plasma samples.

Results: Pyrosequencing in the discovery set showed that PRAME and CLDN11 promoter methylation levels were significant diagnostic biomarkers of melanoma; no significant differences in SHOX2 promoter methylation were found between melanoma and naevi. MS-qPCR for the detection of PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels was established. A diagnostic algorithm based on cycle threshold values was constructed and achieved high accuracy in the training set (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 85.6%), validation set (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 88.7%) and plasma samples (sensitivity 51.6%, specificity 83.8%). In terms of melanoma subtypes, the diagnostic algorithm enabled a high degree of discrimination between acral (sensitivity 89.9%, specificity 86.4%) and mucosal melanoma (sensitivity 100%, specificity 83.3%). More importantly, the diagnostic algorithm was able to distinguish early-stage melanoma from normal naevus, with an area under the curve of 0.879 and sensitivity of 77.3%.

Conclusions: The approach to detecting PRAME and CLDN11 methylation levels using MS-qPCR has high sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic tumours. Using this approach in plasma is a promising and easily implementable strategy for early melanoma screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信