Ioannis S Nikitakis, Gregory C Bogdanis, Giorgos P Paradisis, Argyris G Toubekis
{"title":"游泳中同时进行短跑和有氧训练:运动顺序对生理反应和感觉运动的影响。","authors":"Ioannis S Nikitakis, Gregory C Bogdanis, Giorgos P Paradisis, Argyris G Toubekis","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2493021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study examined the effect of aerobic and sprint sets sequence on physiological responses and perceived exertion during concurrent training sessions. Twelve male highly trained swimmers performed four sessions in randomized order, using combinations of the following training sets: (a) lactate threshold training (8 × 200-m at a speed corresponding to lactate threshold with 30-s recovery; LT), (b) high-intensity aerobic training (8 × 100-m at the maximal aerobic speed with 30-s recovery; MAS) and (c) repeated-sprints training (8 × 25-m repeated sprints with 2-min recovery; SPR). The four combinations used were as follows: LT-SPR, SPR-LT, MAS-SPR, SPR-MAS. Blood lactate (BL), pH, base excess (BE), bicarbonate, heart rate (HR), HR variability, objective [training impulse (iTRIMP)] and subjective training load [session's rating of perceived exertion (sRPE)] were measured. Between session pH and BE were no different, but mean BL was higher in sessions starting with repeated sprints compared with the reverse order (SPR-LT: 6.3 ± 3.6, LT-SPR: 5.3 ± 3.7 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.03; SPR-MAS: 7.2 ± 3.9, MAS-SPR: 6.0 ± 3.7 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.05). Bicarbonate in SPR-LT was lower compared with LT-SPR (<i>p</i> = 0.03). sRPE, but not iTRIMP, was higher in sessions starting with SPR compared with the reverse order (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Anaerobic-aerobic set sequence, compared with the reverse order, augments BL response and increases perceived training load but not the training impulse.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent sprint and aerobic training in swimming: Influence of exercise sequence on physiological responses and perceived exertion.\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis S Nikitakis, Gregory C Bogdanis, Giorgos P Paradisis, Argyris G Toubekis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2493021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study examined the effect of aerobic and sprint sets sequence on physiological responses and perceived exertion during concurrent training sessions. Twelve male highly trained swimmers performed four sessions in randomized order, using combinations of the following training sets: (a) lactate threshold training (8 × 200-m at a speed corresponding to lactate threshold with 30-s recovery; LT), (b) high-intensity aerobic training (8 × 100-m at the maximal aerobic speed with 30-s recovery; MAS) and (c) repeated-sprints training (8 × 25-m repeated sprints with 2-min recovery; SPR). The four combinations used were as follows: LT-SPR, SPR-LT, MAS-SPR, SPR-MAS. Blood lactate (BL), pH, base excess (BE), bicarbonate, heart rate (HR), HR variability, objective [training impulse (iTRIMP)] and subjective training load [session's rating of perceived exertion (sRPE)] were measured. Between session pH and BE were no different, but mean BL was higher in sessions starting with repeated sprints compared with the reverse order (SPR-LT: 6.3 ± 3.6, LT-SPR: 5.3 ± 3.7 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.03; SPR-MAS: 7.2 ± 3.9, MAS-SPR: 6.0 ± 3.7 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.05). Bicarbonate in SPR-LT was lower compared with LT-SPR (<i>p</i> = 0.03). sRPE, but not iTRIMP, was higher in sessions starting with SPR compared with the reverse order (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Anaerobic-aerobic set sequence, compared with the reverse order, augments BL response and increases perceived training load but not the training impulse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2493021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2493021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concurrent sprint and aerobic training in swimming: Influence of exercise sequence on physiological responses and perceived exertion.
The study examined the effect of aerobic and sprint sets sequence on physiological responses and perceived exertion during concurrent training sessions. Twelve male highly trained swimmers performed four sessions in randomized order, using combinations of the following training sets: (a) lactate threshold training (8 × 200-m at a speed corresponding to lactate threshold with 30-s recovery; LT), (b) high-intensity aerobic training (8 × 100-m at the maximal aerobic speed with 30-s recovery; MAS) and (c) repeated-sprints training (8 × 25-m repeated sprints with 2-min recovery; SPR). The four combinations used were as follows: LT-SPR, SPR-LT, MAS-SPR, SPR-MAS. Blood lactate (BL), pH, base excess (BE), bicarbonate, heart rate (HR), HR variability, objective [training impulse (iTRIMP)] and subjective training load [session's rating of perceived exertion (sRPE)] were measured. Between session pH and BE were no different, but mean BL was higher in sessions starting with repeated sprints compared with the reverse order (SPR-LT: 6.3 ± 3.6, LT-SPR: 5.3 ± 3.7 mmol·L-1, p = 0.03; SPR-MAS: 7.2 ± 3.9, MAS-SPR: 6.0 ± 3.7 mmol·L-1, p = 0.05). Bicarbonate in SPR-LT was lower compared with LT-SPR (p = 0.03). sRPE, but not iTRIMP, was higher in sessions starting with SPR compared with the reverse order (p = 0.02). Anaerobic-aerobic set sequence, compared with the reverse order, augments BL response and increases perceived training load but not the training impulse.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.