Norman Poole, Sarah Cope, Serena Vanzan, Aimee Duffus, Tatiana Williams, Nadia Mantovani, Jared G Smith, Barbara Barrett, Martin Scicluna, Sarah Beardmore, Mark J Edwards, Robert Howard
{"title":"网络群体接纳与承诺治疗功能性认知障碍的随机对照可行性试验。","authors":"Norman Poole, Sarah Cope, Serena Vanzan, Aimee Duffus, Tatiana Williams, Nadia Mantovani, Jared G Smith, Barbara Barrett, Martin Scicluna, Sarah Beardmore, Mark J Edwards, Robert Howard","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional cognitive disorder is an increasingly recognised subtype of functional neurological disorder for which treatment options are currently limited. We have developed a brief online group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of this intervention versus treatment as usual (TAU).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a parallel-group, single-blind randomised controlled trial, with participants recruited from cognitive neurology, neuropsychiatry and memory clinics in London. Participants were randomised into two groups: ACT + TAU or TAU alone. Feasibility was assessed on the basis of recruitment and retention rates, the acceptability of the intervention, and signal of efficacy on the primary outcome measure (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II)) score, although the study was not powered to demonstrate this statistically. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 2, 4 and 6 months post-intervention, including assessments of quality of life, memory, anxiety, depression and healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomised 44 participants, with a participation rate of 51.1% (95% CI 40.8-61.5%); 36% of referred participants declined involvement, but retention was high, with 81.8% of ACT participants attending at least four sessions, and 64.3% of ACT participants reported being 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' compared with 0% in the TAU group. Psychological flexibility as measured using the AAQ-II showed a trend towards modest improvement in the ACT group at 6 months. Other measures (quality of life, mood, memory satisfaction) also demonstrated small to modest positive trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has proven feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial of ACT versus TAU.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 3","pages":"e91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised controlled feasibility trial of online group acceptance and commitment therapy for functional cognitive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Norman Poole, Sarah Cope, Serena Vanzan, Aimee Duffus, Tatiana Williams, Nadia Mantovani, Jared G Smith, Barbara Barrett, Martin Scicluna, Sarah Beardmore, Mark J Edwards, Robert Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional cognitive disorder is an increasingly recognised subtype of functional neurological disorder for which treatment options are currently limited. We have developed a brief online group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of this intervention versus treatment as usual (TAU).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a parallel-group, single-blind randomised controlled trial, with participants recruited from cognitive neurology, neuropsychiatry and memory clinics in London. Participants were randomised into two groups: ACT + TAU or TAU alone. Feasibility was assessed on the basis of recruitment and retention rates, the acceptability of the intervention, and signal of efficacy on the primary outcome measure (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II)) score, although the study was not powered to demonstrate this statistically. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 2, 4 and 6 months post-intervention, including assessments of quality of life, memory, anxiety, depression and healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomised 44 participants, with a participation rate of 51.1% (95% CI 40.8-61.5%); 36% of referred participants declined involvement, but retention was high, with 81.8% of ACT participants attending at least four sessions, and 64.3% of ACT participants reported being 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' compared with 0% in the TAU group. Psychological flexibility as measured using the AAQ-II showed a trend towards modest improvement in the ACT group at 6 months. Other measures (quality of life, mood, memory satisfaction) also demonstrated small to modest positive trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has proven feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial of ACT versus TAU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"e91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.33\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.33","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:功能性认知障碍是一种越来越被认可的功能性神经障碍亚型,目前治疗方案有限。我们已经开发了一个简短的在线团体接受和承诺治疗(ACT)为基础的干预。目的:评估进行这种干预与常规治疗(TAU)的随机对照试验的可行性。方法:该研究是一项平行组、单盲随机对照试验,参与者来自伦敦的认知神经病学、神经精神病学和记忆诊所。参与者随机分为两组:ACT + TAU或单独TAU。可行性是根据招募率和保留率、干预的可接受性和主要结果测量指标(接受和行动问卷II (AAQ-II))得分的有效性信号来评估的,尽管该研究没有在统计上证明这一点。在基线和干预后2、4和6个月收集结果测量,包括生活质量、记忆、焦虑、抑郁和医疗保健使用的评估。结果:我们随机纳入了44名受试者,参与率为51.1% (95% CI 40.8-61.5%);36%的被推荐参与者拒绝参与,但保留率很高,81.8%的ACT参与者至少参加了四次会议,64.3%的ACT参与者报告“满意”或“非常满意”,而TAU组的这一比例为0%。使用AAQ-II测量的心理灵活性在6个月时显示ACT组有适度改善的趋势。其他指标(生活质量、情绪、记忆满意度)也显示出小到适度的积极趋势。结论:已证明进行ACT与TAU的随机对照试验是可行的。
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of online group acceptance and commitment therapy for functional cognitive disorder.
Background: Functional cognitive disorder is an increasingly recognised subtype of functional neurological disorder for which treatment options are currently limited. We have developed a brief online group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based intervention.
Aims: To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of this intervention versus treatment as usual (TAU).
Method: The study was a parallel-group, single-blind randomised controlled trial, with participants recruited from cognitive neurology, neuropsychiatry and memory clinics in London. Participants were randomised into two groups: ACT + TAU or TAU alone. Feasibility was assessed on the basis of recruitment and retention rates, the acceptability of the intervention, and signal of efficacy on the primary outcome measure (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II)) score, although the study was not powered to demonstrate this statistically. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 2, 4 and 6 months post-intervention, including assessments of quality of life, memory, anxiety, depression and healthcare use.
Results: We randomised 44 participants, with a participation rate of 51.1% (95% CI 40.8-61.5%); 36% of referred participants declined involvement, but retention was high, with 81.8% of ACT participants attending at least four sessions, and 64.3% of ACT participants reported being 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' compared with 0% in the TAU group. Psychological flexibility as measured using the AAQ-II showed a trend towards modest improvement in the ACT group at 6 months. Other measures (quality of life, mood, memory satisfaction) also demonstrated small to modest positive trends.
Conclusions: It has proven feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial of ACT versus TAU.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.