残疾成人牙科服务使用:2015-2016年和2017-2018年全国健康和营养检查调查结果

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Huabin Luo, Hua Daniel Xu, Missy Stancil, Vanessa Pardi, Mark E Moss
{"title":"残疾成人牙科服务使用:2015-2016年和2017-2018年全国健康和营养检查调查结果","authors":"Huabin Luo, Hua Daniel Xu, Missy Stancil, Vanessa Pardi, Mark E Moss","doi":"10.1177/00333549251314315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>People with disabilities face many challenges in accessing dental care. We compared disparities in dental care patterns (ie, dental visits for preventive care or treatment) between adults with and without hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). For outcome variables, we included self-reported dental visit (yes/no) and preventive dental visit (yes/no) within the past year. NHANES asked participants whether they had serious difficulty in conducting any of the following 6 activities: hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living; participants who answered yes to any of these activities were classified as disabled. Our analytic sample included 11 288 adult respondents aged ≥20 years. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between disability status-measured by any disability (yes/no), the 6 types of disabilities (yes/no), and the number of disabilities-and the outcome variables, with <i>P</i> ≤ .05 indicating significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents with disabilities were less likely than those without a disability to have a preventive dental visit (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.77). Respondents with disabilities in mobility, self-care, or independent living were significantly less likely than those without any disability to have a dental visit. In addition, adults with more disabilities were significantly less likely than those without a disability to have a dental visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to preventive dental care was limited among people with disabilities. Further assistance, including providing dental insurance coverage, is needed to increase access to dental care among people with disabilities, especially those with mobility, self-care, and independent living disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251314315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental Services Use Among Adults With Disabilities: Results From the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Huabin Luo, Hua Daniel Xu, Missy Stancil, Vanessa Pardi, Mark E Moss\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00333549251314315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>People with disabilities face many challenges in accessing dental care. We compared disparities in dental care patterns (ie, dental visits for preventive care or treatment) between adults with and without hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). For outcome variables, we included self-reported dental visit (yes/no) and preventive dental visit (yes/no) within the past year. NHANES asked participants whether they had serious difficulty in conducting any of the following 6 activities: hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living; participants who answered yes to any of these activities were classified as disabled. Our analytic sample included 11 288 adult respondents aged ≥20 years. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between disability status-measured by any disability (yes/no), the 6 types of disabilities (yes/no), and the number of disabilities-and the outcome variables, with <i>P</i> ≤ .05 indicating significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents with disabilities were less likely than those without a disability to have a preventive dental visit (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.77). Respondents with disabilities in mobility, self-care, or independent living were significantly less likely than those without any disability to have a dental visit. In addition, adults with more disabilities were significantly less likely than those without a disability to have a dental visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to preventive dental care was limited among people with disabilities. Further assistance, including providing dental insurance coverage, is needed to increase access to dental care among people with disabilities, especially those with mobility, self-care, and independent living disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333549251314315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251314315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251314315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:残疾人在获得牙科护理方面面临许多挑战。我们比较了有和没有听力、视力、活动能力、自我保健、认知或独立生活障碍的成年人在牙科保健模式(即预防性保健或治疗的牙科就诊)方面的差异。方法:我们分析2015-2016年和2017-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。对于结果变量,我们包括过去一年内自我报告的牙科就诊(是/否)和预防性牙科就诊(是/否)。NHANES询问参与者在以下6项活动中是否有严重困难:听力、视觉、活动能力、自我照顾、认知或独立生活;对上述任何一项活动回答“是”的参与者都被归类为残疾人。我们的分析样本包括11 288名年龄≥20岁的成年人。我们使用多元逻辑回归来评估残疾状态(以任何残疾(是/否)、6种残疾(是/否)和残疾数量衡量)与结果变量之间的关联,P≤。0.05表示显著性。结果:有残疾的受访者比没有残疾的受访者更不可能进行预防性牙科就诊(调整优势比= 0.67;95% ci, 0.59-0.77)。在行动、自我照顾或独立生活方面有残疾的受访者比没有任何残疾的人更不可能去看牙医。此外,残疾较多的成年人去看牙医的可能性明显低于没有残疾的成年人。结论:残疾人获得预防性牙科保健的机会有限。需要提供进一步的援助,包括提供牙科保险,以增加残疾人获得牙科保健的机会,特别是那些行动不便、自我照顾和独立生活残疾的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental Services Use Among Adults With Disabilities: Results From the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Objectives: People with disabilities face many challenges in accessing dental care. We compared disparities in dental care patterns (ie, dental visits for preventive care or treatment) between adults with and without hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living disabilities.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). For outcome variables, we included self-reported dental visit (yes/no) and preventive dental visit (yes/no) within the past year. NHANES asked participants whether they had serious difficulty in conducting any of the following 6 activities: hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living; participants who answered yes to any of these activities were classified as disabled. Our analytic sample included 11 288 adult respondents aged ≥20 years. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between disability status-measured by any disability (yes/no), the 6 types of disabilities (yes/no), and the number of disabilities-and the outcome variables, with P ≤ .05 indicating significance.

Results: Respondents with disabilities were less likely than those without a disability to have a preventive dental visit (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.77). Respondents with disabilities in mobility, self-care, or independent living were significantly less likely than those without any disability to have a dental visit. In addition, adults with more disabilities were significantly less likely than those without a disability to have a dental visit.

Conclusions: Access to preventive dental care was limited among people with disabilities. Further assistance, including providing dental insurance coverage, is needed to increase access to dental care among people with disabilities, especially those with mobility, self-care, and independent living disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信