实施多阶段,多机构的QI倡议,以优化心脏ICU患者的镇静做法。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Richard U Garcia, Kimberly DiMaria, Jamie Penk, Sherrill Caprarola, Amy Romer, Michael P Fundora, Deborah U Frank, Barbara-Jo Achuff
{"title":"实施多阶段,多机构的QI倡议,以优化心脏ICU患者的镇静做法。","authors":"Richard U Garcia, Kimberly DiMaria, Jamie Penk, Sherrill Caprarola, Amy Romer, Michael P Fundora, Deborah U Frank, Barbara-Jo Achuff","doi":"10.1017/S104795112500160X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is wide variation in institutional sedation strategies in paediatric cardiac ICU. Validated tools such as State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale were created to help standardise sedation practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multi-phase, multicentre, prospective project with the goal of optimising safety and comfort for paediatric cardiac ICU patients. Phase one consisted of an educational intervention with a self-paced, web-based video module on optimal sedation practices using validated sedation screening tools. Participant knowledge was assessed via a de-identified, unmatched pre- and post-test survey. Survey scores were reported as an aggregate average score and compared using a t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 259 pre-tests, and 142 post-tests collected during the video-assisted educational intervention. There was a significant increase in mean score on the post-test compared to the pre-test for both instruments: from 4 to 4.8/10 for State Behavioral Scale (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and from 4.5 to 4.9 for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (<i>p</i> = 0.04). 81% of respondents who completed the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-test and 88.1% of those who completed the State Behavioral Scale post-test said their practice would change based on the new knowledge acquired.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report that our newly developed learning module intervention was effective in increasing short-term knowledge about optimal sedation and sedation scoring. Ongoing phase two efforts include evaluation of long-term compliance of validated sedation screening tools and developing an objective score to measure individual cumulative opioid dosing in the cardiac critical care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a multiphase, multi-institutional QI initiative to optimise sedation practices in cardiac ICU patients.\",\"authors\":\"Richard U Garcia, Kimberly DiMaria, Jamie Penk, Sherrill Caprarola, Amy Romer, Michael P Fundora, Deborah U Frank, Barbara-Jo Achuff\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S104795112500160X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is wide variation in institutional sedation strategies in paediatric cardiac ICU. Validated tools such as State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale were created to help standardise sedation practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multi-phase, multicentre, prospective project with the goal of optimising safety and comfort for paediatric cardiac ICU patients. Phase one consisted of an educational intervention with a self-paced, web-based video module on optimal sedation practices using validated sedation screening tools. Participant knowledge was assessed via a de-identified, unmatched pre- and post-test survey. Survey scores were reported as an aggregate average score and compared using a t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 259 pre-tests, and 142 post-tests collected during the video-assisted educational intervention. There was a significant increase in mean score on the post-test compared to the pre-test for both instruments: from 4 to 4.8/10 for State Behavioral Scale (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and from 4.5 to 4.9 for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (<i>p</i> = 0.04). 81% of respondents who completed the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-test and 88.1% of those who completed the State Behavioral Scale post-test said their practice would change based on the new knowledge acquired.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report that our newly developed learning module intervention was effective in increasing short-term knowledge about optimal sedation and sedation scoring. Ongoing phase two efforts include evaluation of long-term compliance of validated sedation screening tools and developing an objective score to measure individual cumulative opioid dosing in the cardiac critical care unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S104795112500160X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S104795112500160X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿科心脏ICU的机构镇静策略存在很大差异。创建了有效的工具,如国家行为量表和里士满搅拌镇静量表,以帮助标准化镇静实践。方法:这是一个多阶段、多中心、前瞻性的项目,目的是优化儿科心脏ICU患者的安全性和舒适性。第一阶段包括一个教育干预,使用一个自定节奏的、基于网络的视频模块,使用经过验证的镇静筛选工具进行最佳镇静练习。参与者的知识被评估通过去识别,不匹配的前和后测试调查。调查得分报告为总平均得分,并使用t检验进行比较。结果:视频辅助教育干预共收集前测259份,后测142份。与前测相比,两种工具的后测平均得分均有显著提高:州行为量表从4分提高到4.8分(p = 0.01),里士满躁动镇静量表从4.5分提高到4.9分(p = 0.04)。81%完成里士满激越镇静量表后测的受访者和88.1%完成州行为量表后测的受访者表示,他们的做法会根据获得的新知识而改变。结论:我们报告我们新开发的学习模块干预在增加关于最佳镇静和镇静评分的短期知识方面是有效的。正在进行的第二阶段工作包括评估经过验证的镇静筛查工具的长期依从性,并制定客观评分来衡量心脏重症监护病房的个体累积阿片类药物剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a multiphase, multi-institutional QI initiative to optimise sedation practices in cardiac ICU patients.

Introduction: There is wide variation in institutional sedation strategies in paediatric cardiac ICU. Validated tools such as State Behavioral Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale were created to help standardise sedation practices.

Methods: This is a multi-phase, multicentre, prospective project with the goal of optimising safety and comfort for paediatric cardiac ICU patients. Phase one consisted of an educational intervention with a self-paced, web-based video module on optimal sedation practices using validated sedation screening tools. Participant knowledge was assessed via a de-identified, unmatched pre- and post-test survey. Survey scores were reported as an aggregate average score and compared using a t-test.

Results: There were 259 pre-tests, and 142 post-tests collected during the video-assisted educational intervention. There was a significant increase in mean score on the post-test compared to the pre-test for both instruments: from 4 to 4.8/10 for State Behavioral Scale (p = 0.01) and from 4.5 to 4.9 for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (p = 0.04). 81% of respondents who completed the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-test and 88.1% of those who completed the State Behavioral Scale post-test said their practice would change based on the new knowledge acquired.

Conclusion: We report that our newly developed learning module intervention was effective in increasing short-term knowledge about optimal sedation and sedation scoring. Ongoing phase two efforts include evaluation of long-term compliance of validated sedation screening tools and developing an objective score to measure individual cumulative opioid dosing in the cardiac critical care unit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信