评估和管理痴呆中的疼痛:来自跨学科短信交流的见解。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ashley Woods, Matthew Farmer, Mihail Popescu, Kimberly Powell
{"title":"评估和管理痴呆中的疼痛:来自跨学科短信交流的见解。","authors":"Ashley Woods, Matthew Farmer, Mihail Popescu, Kimberly Powell","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the difference between the representation of pain assessment and management among older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) residing in nursing homes (NH) using interdisciplinary text messages (TMs) exchanged prior to hospital transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study and secondary data analysis of (n = 21,000) TMs exchanged among interdisciplinary healthcare team members and survey data about NH residents who transferred to the hospital from 2016 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed TMs using natural language processing tools to identify mentions of pain assessment, management, and pain medications. We used a two-sample independent t-test and a negative binomial generalized linear model to assess the association between pain mentions and various resident characteristics, including ADRD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 694 transfer events involving 414 residents, 39% of whom had ADRD. Significant differences were found in pain mentions, with ADRD residents having fewer mentions (t = 2.38, p = .02) than those without ADRD. The generalized linear model identified statistically significant predictors (age, race, and specific comorbidities) of the number of TMs exchanged with pain mentions about NH residents. Dementia stage and avoidable transfers were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate pain is underrepresented in communications about Black residents and those with ADRD, potentially contributing to disparities in pain assessment and management in these populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study indicates a need for more equitable pain practices with improved pain assessment tools and pain assessment and management, particularly with TM communication in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing and Managing Pain in Dementias: Insights From Interdisciplinary Text Message Communications.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Woods, Matthew Farmer, Mihail Popescu, Kimberly Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the difference between the representation of pain assessment and management among older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) residing in nursing homes (NH) using interdisciplinary text messages (TMs) exchanged prior to hospital transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study and secondary data analysis of (n = 21,000) TMs exchanged among interdisciplinary healthcare team members and survey data about NH residents who transferred to the hospital from 2016 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed TMs using natural language processing tools to identify mentions of pain assessment, management, and pain medications. We used a two-sample independent t-test and a negative binomial generalized linear model to assess the association between pain mentions and various resident characteristics, including ADRD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 694 transfer events involving 414 residents, 39% of whom had ADRD. Significant differences were found in pain mentions, with ADRD residents having fewer mentions (t = 2.38, p = .02) than those without ADRD. The generalized linear model identified statistically significant predictors (age, race, and specific comorbidities) of the number of TMs exchanged with pain mentions about NH residents. Dementia stage and avoidable transfers were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate pain is underrepresented in communications about Black residents and those with ADRD, potentially contributing to disparities in pain assessment and management in these populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study indicates a need for more equitable pain practices with improved pain assessment tools and pain assessment and management, particularly with TM communication in healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.04.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨在疗养院(NH)使用跨学科短信(TMs)交换的老年阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)患者的疼痛评估和管理表现之间的差异。设计:回顾性队列研究和二级数据分析(n = 21,000)跨学科医疗团队成员之间交换的TMs,以及2016年至2020年转到医院的NH居民的调查数据。方法:该研究使用自然语言处理工具对TMs进行分析,以识别提及的疼痛评估、管理和止痛药。我们使用两样本独立t检验和负二项广义线性模型来评估疼痛提及与各种住院特征(包括ADRD状态)之间的关系。结果:共纳入694起转移事件,涉及414名居民,其中39%发生ADRD。在提及疼痛方面存在显著差异,与无ADRD的患者相比,ADRD患者提及疼痛的次数较少(t = 2.38, p = 0.02)。广义线性模型确定了统计上显著的预测因子(年龄、种族和特定合并症),这些预测因子与NH居民的疼痛提及交换的TMs数量有关。痴呆分期和可避免转移无显著性差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在关于黑人居民和ADRD患者的交流中,疼痛的代表性不足,这可能导致这些人群在疼痛评估和管理方面的差异。临床意义:本研究表明,需要更公平的疼痛实践与改进的疼痛评估工具和疼痛评估和管理,特别是在医疗机构的TM沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing and Managing Pain in Dementias: Insights From Interdisciplinary Text Message Communications.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the difference between the representation of pain assessment and management among older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) residing in nursing homes (NH) using interdisciplinary text messages (TMs) exchanged prior to hospital transfer.

Design: A retrospective cohort study and secondary data analysis of (n = 21,000) TMs exchanged among interdisciplinary healthcare team members and survey data about NH residents who transferred to the hospital from 2016 to 2020.

Methods: The study analyzed TMs using natural language processing tools to identify mentions of pain assessment, management, and pain medications. We used a two-sample independent t-test and a negative binomial generalized linear model to assess the association between pain mentions and various resident characteristics, including ADRD status.

Results: The analysis included 694 transfer events involving 414 residents, 39% of whom had ADRD. Significant differences were found in pain mentions, with ADRD residents having fewer mentions (t = 2.38, p = .02) than those without ADRD. The generalized linear model identified statistically significant predictors (age, race, and specific comorbidities) of the number of TMs exchanged with pain mentions about NH residents. Dementia stage and avoidable transfers were not significant.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate pain is underrepresented in communications about Black residents and those with ADRD, potentially contributing to disparities in pain assessment and management in these populations.

Clinical implications: This study indicates a need for more equitable pain practices with improved pain assessment tools and pain assessment and management, particularly with TM communication in healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信