环硅酸锆钠与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠治疗血液透析患者高钾血症:一项随机临床试验

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohamed Mamdouh Elsayed, Marwa Ahmed Abdelrahman, Abdelrazik Mohamed Sorour, Islam Ghanem Rizk, Mohamed Aly Abdelhalim Hassab
{"title":"环硅酸锆钠与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠治疗血液透析患者高钾血症:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Mohamed Mamdouh Elsayed, Marwa Ahmed Abdelrahman, Abdelrazik Mohamed Sorour, Islam Ghanem Rizk, Mohamed Aly Abdelhalim Hassab","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04129-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperkalemia is a frequent life-threatening condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Data comparing the usage of various K + binders in HD patients is still scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for treatment of hyperkalemia in HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blinded, randomized multicenter clinical trial enrolled 120 HD patients with predialysis serum potassium > 5 mmol/L. Patients were randomized to receive SZC (5 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 15 gm/wk) or SPS (15 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 45 gm/wk) for 8 weeks. The change in serum potassium through the 8 weeks of the study was our primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum potassium significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values from the first week till the end of the study with p value of < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. Serum K levels in the SZC group were significantly lower (achieved normokalemia after 2 weeks) than K levels in the SPS group (achieved normokalemia after 6 weeks) through the study period (p < 0.001). Rescue therapy for hyperkalemia was less frequent in the SZC group (3.3%) than the SPS group (6.6%) (p = 0.678). Gastrointestinal side effects were non significantly fewer with SZC (5%) compared to SPS (11.6%). However, SPS was less palatable (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to SPS treatment, SZC was associated with a more rapid and efficacious resolution of hyperkalemia with potentially a better safety profile and palatability among HD patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06029179. First registration date: 9/01/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate for treatment of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Mamdouh Elsayed, Marwa Ahmed Abdelrahman, Abdelrazik Mohamed Sorour, Islam Ghanem Rizk, Mohamed Aly Abdelhalim Hassab\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04129-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperkalemia is a frequent life-threatening condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Data comparing the usage of various K + binders in HD patients is still scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for treatment of hyperkalemia in HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blinded, randomized multicenter clinical trial enrolled 120 HD patients with predialysis serum potassium > 5 mmol/L. Patients were randomized to receive SZC (5 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 15 gm/wk) or SPS (15 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 45 gm/wk) for 8 weeks. The change in serum potassium through the 8 weeks of the study was our primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum potassium significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values from the first week till the end of the study with p value of < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. Serum K levels in the SZC group were significantly lower (achieved normokalemia after 2 weeks) than K levels in the SPS group (achieved normokalemia after 6 weeks) through the study period (p < 0.001). Rescue therapy for hyperkalemia was less frequent in the SZC group (3.3%) than the SPS group (6.6%) (p = 0.678). Gastrointestinal side effects were non significantly fewer with SZC (5%) compared to SPS (11.6%). However, SPS was less palatable (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to SPS treatment, SZC was associated with a more rapid and efficacious resolution of hyperkalemia with potentially a better safety profile and palatability among HD patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06029179. First registration date: 9/01/2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04129-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04129-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高钾血症是血液透析(HD)患者常见的危及生命的疾病。比较各种K +结合剂在HD患者中的使用情况的数据仍然很少。本研究旨在比较环硅酸锆钠(SZC)和聚苯乙烯磺酸钠(SPS)治疗HD患者高钾血症的疗效和安全性。方法:本前瞻性、双盲、随机多中心临床试验纳入120例透析前血清钾> 5 mmol/L的HD患者。患者随机接受SZC (5 g,非透析日3次/周,15 gm/周)或SPS (15 g,非透析日3次/周,45 gm/周),持续8周。在8周的研究中,血清钾的变化是我们的主要结果。结果:从研究的第一周到研究结束,两组的血清钾与基线值相比显著下降,p值为。结论:与SPS治疗相比,SZC与高钾血症的快速有效解决有关,并且在HD患者中具有更好的安全性和可食性。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06029179。首次注册日期:2023年9月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate for treatment of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Hyperkalemia is a frequent life-threatening condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Data comparing the usage of various K + binders in HD patients is still scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for treatment of hyperkalemia in HD patients.

Methods: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized multicenter clinical trial enrolled 120 HD patients with predialysis serum potassium > 5 mmol/L. Patients were randomized to receive SZC (5 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 15 gm/wk) or SPS (15 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 45 gm/wk) for 8 weeks. The change in serum potassium through the 8 weeks of the study was our primary outcome.

Results: Serum potassium significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values from the first week till the end of the study with p value of < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. Serum K levels in the SZC group were significantly lower (achieved normokalemia after 2 weeks) than K levels in the SPS group (achieved normokalemia after 6 weeks) through the study period (p < 0.001). Rescue therapy for hyperkalemia was less frequent in the SZC group (3.3%) than the SPS group (6.6%) (p = 0.678). Gastrointestinal side effects were non significantly fewer with SZC (5%) compared to SPS (11.6%). However, SPS was less palatable (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: When compared to SPS treatment, SZC was associated with a more rapid and efficacious resolution of hyperkalemia with potentially a better safety profile and palatability among HD patients.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06029179. First registration date: 9/01/2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信