单切口与传统多口腹腔镜辅助手术治疗儿童梅克尔憩室:单中心倾向评分分析

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Zhuojun Xie, Wei Feng, Xiaohong Die, Jinping Hou, Zhenhua Guo, Wei Liu, Yi Wang, Shasha Tian
{"title":"单切口与传统多口腹腔镜辅助手术治疗儿童梅克尔憩室:单中心倾向评分分析","authors":"Zhuojun Xie, Wei Feng, Xiaohong Die, Jinping Hou, Zhenhua Guo, Wei Liu, Yi Wang, Shasha Tian","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05695-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the small intestine, and often leads to various complications in children. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of MD in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for MD at a tertiary pediatric hospital from February 2017 to February 2023 was conducted with registered of demographic information, preoperative laboratory results, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes. Based on the surgical strategy, patients were classified into SILS and CLS groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounding factors, resulting in 188 matched pairs. Using PSM, the two groups were compared for baseline differences and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 561 patients, the SILS-to-CLS ratio was 301: 260. After one-to-one PSM, results showed that compared with the CLS group, the SILS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.004), and earlier excretion time and fasting time (P < 0.05). Furthermore, SILS resulted in better scar assessment and higher satisfaction score (both P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (P = 0.439) and readmission (P = 0.291). Conversion to open surgery was more common in the SILS group (10.6%) than in the CLS group (6.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant after matching (P = 0.139).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study aimed to determine the superiority of SILS over CLS in the treatment of pediatric MD. SILS offers distinct advantages over CLS in managing MD in children, including shorter hospital stays and bowel function recovery, without increasing postoperative complications. These findings suggest that SILS may be a preferable approach, warranting its integration into standard clinical practice for MD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Meckel's diverticulum in children: a single-center propensity score analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhuojun Xie, Wei Feng, Xiaohong Die, Jinping Hou, Zhenhua Guo, Wei Liu, Yi Wang, Shasha Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-025-05695-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the small intestine, and often leads to various complications in children. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of MD in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for MD at a tertiary pediatric hospital from February 2017 to February 2023 was conducted with registered of demographic information, preoperative laboratory results, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes. Based on the surgical strategy, patients were classified into SILS and CLS groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounding factors, resulting in 188 matched pairs. Using PSM, the two groups were compared for baseline differences and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 561 patients, the SILS-to-CLS ratio was 301: 260. After one-to-one PSM, results showed that compared with the CLS group, the SILS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.004), and earlier excretion time and fasting time (P < 0.05). Furthermore, SILS resulted in better scar assessment and higher satisfaction score (both P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (P = 0.439) and readmission (P = 0.291). Conversion to open surgery was more common in the SILS group (10.6%) than in the CLS group (6.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant after matching (P = 0.139).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study aimed to determine the superiority of SILS over CLS in the treatment of pediatric MD. SILS offers distinct advantages over CLS in managing MD in children, including shorter hospital stays and bowel function recovery, without increasing postoperative complications. These findings suggest that SILS may be a preferable approach, warranting its integration into standard clinical practice for MD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05695-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05695-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:梅克尔憩室(Meckel's diverticulum, MD)是儿童最常见的先天性小肠异常,常导致各种并发症。本研究旨在比较单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)与常规腹腔镜手术(CLS)治疗儿童MD的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2017年2月至2023年2月在某三级儿科医院行腹腔镜手术治疗MD的患者,记录其人口学信息、术前实验室结果、手术表现和术后结果。根据手术策略将患者分为SILS组和CLS组。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)对混杂因素进行校正,得到188对匹配结果。使用PSM,比较两组的基线差异和术后结果。结果:561例患者中,sls与cls的比值为301:260。一对一PSM后,结果显示,与CLS组相比,SILS组术后住院时间明显缩短(P = 0.004),排泄时间和禁食时间更早(P)。结论:我们的研究旨在确定SILS比CLS治疗儿童MD的优势。SILS在治疗儿童MD方面具有明显优势,包括更短的住院时间和肠道功能恢复,且不会增加术后并发症。这些发现表明,SILS可能是一种更好的方法,有必要将其纳入MD治疗的标准临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Meckel's diverticulum in children: a single-center propensity score analysis.

Background: Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the small intestine, and often leads to various complications in children. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of MD in children.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for MD at a tertiary pediatric hospital from February 2017 to February 2023 was conducted with registered of demographic information, preoperative laboratory results, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes. Based on the surgical strategy, patients were classified into SILS and CLS groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounding factors, resulting in 188 matched pairs. Using PSM, the two groups were compared for baseline differences and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Of the 561 patients, the SILS-to-CLS ratio was 301: 260. After one-to-one PSM, results showed that compared with the CLS group, the SILS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.004), and earlier excretion time and fasting time (P < 0.05). Furthermore, SILS resulted in better scar assessment and higher satisfaction score (both P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (P = 0.439) and readmission (P = 0.291). Conversion to open surgery was more common in the SILS group (10.6%) than in the CLS group (6.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant after matching (P = 0.139).

Conclusion: Our study aimed to determine the superiority of SILS over CLS in the treatment of pediatric MD. SILS offers distinct advantages over CLS in managing MD in children, including shorter hospital stays and bowel function recovery, without increasing postoperative complications. These findings suggest that SILS may be a preferable approach, warranting its integration into standard clinical practice for MD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信