鼻盐水冲洗联合鼻内类固醇治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit
{"title":"鼻盐水冲洗联合鼻内类固醇治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察。","authors":"Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure \"Allergic rhinitis scoring system\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registered with Clinical trial registry-India, CTRI/2023/01/048641. URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881 .</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of nasal saline irrigation in conjunction with intranasal steroids in allergic rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure \\\"Allergic rhinitis scoring system\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registered with Clinical trial registry-India, CTRI/2023/01/048641. URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3097-3101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨鼻盐水冲洗联合鼻内糖皮质激素治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效,并与单纯鼻内糖皮质激素治疗变应性鼻炎进行比较。方法:在三级保健中心进行的前瞻性随机试验。被诊断为变应性鼻炎的有症状个体被纳入研究。对照组给予丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂(200 mcg/d),治疗组给予丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂(200 mcg/d),同时用等渗生理盐水(50 ml/鼻孔,每次冲洗,每日3次)进行鼻盐水冲洗。两组患者随访12周。结果使用患者报告的经验测量“过敏性鼻炎评分系统”进行比较。结果:共纳入120例患者,每组60例。干预前,两组在变应性鼻炎评分系统上无显著差异。干预后,所有评估症状均有明显改善:鼻出血(14.93±4.16比17.80±3.16,p)结论:鼻盐水冲洗联合鼻内皮质类固醇更有效地缓解变应性鼻炎的所有症状。但两组患者眼部瘙痒症状无明显差异。试验注册:在印度临床试验注册中心注册,CTRI/2023/01/048641。网址:https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of nasal saline irrigation in conjunction with intranasal steroids in allergic rhinitis.

Aim: To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.

Methodology: A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure "Allergic rhinitis scoring system".

Results: A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.

Trial registration: Trial registered with Clinical trial registry-India, CTRI/2023/01/048641. URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信