Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit
{"title":"鼻盐水冲洗联合鼻内类固醇治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察。","authors":"Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure \"Allergic rhinitis scoring system\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registered with Clinical trial registry-India, CTRI/2023/01/048641. URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881 .</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of nasal saline irrigation in conjunction with intranasal steroids in allergic rhinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Omvir Singh Chahar, Sheetal Raina, Ahmad Rizwan, Supreet Singh Nayyar, Shailendra Tripathi, Akshay Bhatnagar, Ombir Singh, Nandini Bisht, Mohneesh Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure \\\"Allergic rhinitis scoring system\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registered with Clinical trial registry-India, CTRI/2023/01/048641. URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/main1.php?EncHid=44058.73881 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3097-3101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09392-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of nasal saline irrigation in conjunction with intranasal steroids in allergic rhinitis.
Aim: To study the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation combined with intranasal corticosteroids in treating Allergic Rhinitis and compare it with intranasal corticosteroids alone.
Methodology: A prospective, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care center. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis were included. The control group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) and the treatment group received fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mcg/day) along with nasal saline irrigation with isotonic normal saline (50 ml/nostril with each irrigation thrice a day). The two groups were followed up for 12 weeks. The outcome was compared using a patient-reported experience measure "Allergic rhinitis scoring system".
Results: A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were included in the study. Pre-intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the Allergic rhinitis scoring system. Post-Intervention, significant improvements were evident across all assessed symptoms: rhinorrhoea (14.93 ± 4.16 vs. 17.80 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), sneezing (14.40 ± 3.91 vs. 18.27 ± 3.16, p < 0.0001), nasal blockage (10.47 ± 4.66 vs. 13.80 ± 4.80, p = 0.0002), nasal pruritus (17.93 ± 3.17 vs. 19.13 ± 1.96, p = 0.0140), ocular pruritus (18.60 ± 2.84 vs. 19.13 ± 2.22, p = 0.2537), and total Allergic rhinitis scoring system score (77.00 ± 9.79 vs. 88.13 ± 7.70, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Nasal saline irrigation used in conjunction with intranasal corticosteroids more effectively alleviates all symptoms of Allergic rhinitis. However, there was no significant difference in ocular pruritus in both groups.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.