人工智能在肺结节诊断中的应用。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
David E Ost
{"title":"人工智能在肺结节诊断中的应用。","authors":"David E Ost","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), focusing on clinical applications and limitations in pulmonary medicine. It explores AI's utility in imaging and blood/tissue-based diagnostics, emphasizing practical challenges over technical details of deep learning methods.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>AI enhances computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) through steps like nodule detection, false positive reduction, segmentation, and classification, leveraging convolutional neural networks and machine learning. Segmentation achieves Dice similarity coefficients of 0.70-0.92, while malignancy classification yields areas under the curve of 0.86-0.97. AI-driven blood tests, incorporating RNA sequencing and clinical data, report AUCs up to 0.907 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, most models lack prospective, multiinstitutional validation, risking overfitting and limited generalizability. The \"black box\" nature of AI, coupled with overlapping inputs (e.g., nodule size, smoking history) with physician assessments, complicates integration into clinical workflows and precludes standard Bayesian analysis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>AI shows promise for SPN diagnosis but requires rigorous validation in diverse populations and better clinician training for effective use. Rather than replacing judgment, AI should serve as a second opinion, with its reported performance metrics understood as study-specific, not directly applicable at the bedside due to double-counting issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence applications for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.\",\"authors\":\"David E Ost\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), focusing on clinical applications and limitations in pulmonary medicine. It explores AI's utility in imaging and blood/tissue-based diagnostics, emphasizing practical challenges over technical details of deep learning methods.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>AI enhances computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) through steps like nodule detection, false positive reduction, segmentation, and classification, leveraging convolutional neural networks and machine learning. Segmentation achieves Dice similarity coefficients of 0.70-0.92, while malignancy classification yields areas under the curve of 0.86-0.97. AI-driven blood tests, incorporating RNA sequencing and clinical data, report AUCs up to 0.907 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, most models lack prospective, multiinstitutional validation, risking overfitting and limited generalizability. The \\\"black box\\\" nature of AI, coupled with overlapping inputs (e.g., nodule size, smoking history) with physician assessments, complicates integration into clinical workflows and precludes standard Bayesian analysis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>AI shows promise for SPN diagnosis but requires rigorous validation in diverse populations and better clinician training for effective use. Rather than replacing judgment, AI should serve as a second opinion, with its reported performance metrics understood as study-specific, not directly applicable at the bedside due to double-counting issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本文评价人工智能(AI)在诊断孤立性肺结节(SPNs)中的作用,重点讨论其在肺医学中的临床应用及局限性。它探讨了人工智能在成像和基于血液/组织的诊断中的应用,强调了深度学习方法的技术细节的实际挑战。最新发现:人工智能通过结节检测、假阳性减少、分割和分类等步骤增强了基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的计算机辅助诊断(CAD),并利用了卷积神经网络和机器学习。分割得到的Dice相似系数为0.70-0.92,恶性分类得到的曲线下面积为0.86-0.97。人工智能驱动的血液测试,结合RNA测序和临床数据,报告auc高达0.907,用于区分良性和恶性结节。然而,大多数模型缺乏前瞻性的、多机构的验证,有过拟合和有限的推广的风险。人工智能的“黑箱”性质,加上与医生评估重叠的输入(例如,结节大小、吸烟史),使整合到临床工作流程变得复杂,并妨碍了标准的贝叶斯分析。总结:人工智能显示出对SPN诊断的希望,但需要在不同人群中进行严格的验证,并需要更好的临床医生培训才能有效使用。人工智能不应取代判断,而应作为第二意见,其报告的性能指标应被理解为特定于研究的指标,由于重复计算问题,不能直接应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence applications for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.

Purpose of review: This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), focusing on clinical applications and limitations in pulmonary medicine. It explores AI's utility in imaging and blood/tissue-based diagnostics, emphasizing practical challenges over technical details of deep learning methods.

Recent findings: AI enhances computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) through steps like nodule detection, false positive reduction, segmentation, and classification, leveraging convolutional neural networks and machine learning. Segmentation achieves Dice similarity coefficients of 0.70-0.92, while malignancy classification yields areas under the curve of 0.86-0.97. AI-driven blood tests, incorporating RNA sequencing and clinical data, report AUCs up to 0.907 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, most models lack prospective, multiinstitutional validation, risking overfitting and limited generalizability. The "black box" nature of AI, coupled with overlapping inputs (e.g., nodule size, smoking history) with physician assessments, complicates integration into clinical workflows and precludes standard Bayesian analysis.

Summary: AI shows promise for SPN diagnosis but requires rigorous validation in diverse populations and better clinician training for effective use. Rather than replacing judgment, AI should serve as a second opinion, with its reported performance metrics understood as study-specific, not directly applicable at the bedside due to double-counting issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信