Lindsay J Collin, Courtney E Johnson, Maxwell Akonde, Mary Kan, Elisa V Bandera, Lauren C Peres, Bo Qin, Michele L Cote, Anthony Alberg, Edward S Peters, Theresa A Hastert, Joellen M Schildkraut
{"title":"在非裔美国人癌症流行病学研究中,对医生的感知歧视、信任及其与女性卵巢癌死亡率的关系","authors":"Lindsay J Collin, Courtney E Johnson, Maxwell Akonde, Mary Kan, Elisa V Bandera, Lauren C Peres, Bo Qin, Michele L Cote, Anthony Alberg, Edward S Peters, Theresa A Hastert, Joellen M Schildkraut","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01995-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Black women are 30% more likely to die of ovarian cancer than White women. Discrimination may affect cancer health disparities through pathways including socioeconomic disadvantage, chronic stress, and access to care. In this study, we evaluated associations of discrimination and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), we included 592 Black ovarian cancer patients who completed an interview. Discrimination and trust in physicians were measured using the Everyday Discrimination, Major Experiences of Discrimination, and Trust in Physicians scales, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associating everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 43% reported experiencing at least one major experience of discrimination, 16% reported high everyday experiences of discrimination, and the median trust in physician score was 35. The association between higher experiences of everyday discrimination was HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.11), compared with low experiences of everyday discrimination. We observed that more major experiences of discrimination had 1.25-times the mortality rate compared with low experiences of major discrimination (95% CI: 0.84, 2.20). Higher trust in physicians was associated with slightly lower mortality rates (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed complexities in the relationships of everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer. Future work to understand the these relationships is likely warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived discrimination, trust in physicians, and their associations with ovarian cancer mortality among women in the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay J Collin, Courtney E Johnson, Maxwell Akonde, Mary Kan, Elisa V Bandera, Lauren C Peres, Bo Qin, Michele L Cote, Anthony Alberg, Edward S Peters, Theresa A Hastert, Joellen M Schildkraut\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-025-01995-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Black women are 30% more likely to die of ovarian cancer than White women. Discrimination may affect cancer health disparities through pathways including socioeconomic disadvantage, chronic stress, and access to care. In this study, we evaluated associations of discrimination and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), we included 592 Black ovarian cancer patients who completed an interview. Discrimination and trust in physicians were measured using the Everyday Discrimination, Major Experiences of Discrimination, and Trust in Physicians scales, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associating everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 43% reported experiencing at least one major experience of discrimination, 16% reported high everyday experiences of discrimination, and the median trust in physician score was 35. The association between higher experiences of everyday discrimination was HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.11), compared with low experiences of everyday discrimination. We observed that more major experiences of discrimination had 1.25-times the mortality rate compared with low experiences of major discrimination (95% CI: 0.84, 2.20). Higher trust in physicians was associated with slightly lower mortality rates (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed complexities in the relationships of everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer. Future work to understand the these relationships is likely warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01995-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01995-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived discrimination, trust in physicians, and their associations with ovarian cancer mortality among women in the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study.
Purpose: Black women are 30% more likely to die of ovarian cancer than White women. Discrimination may affect cancer health disparities through pathways including socioeconomic disadvantage, chronic stress, and access to care. In this study, we evaluated associations of discrimination and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer.
Methods: Using data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), we included 592 Black ovarian cancer patients who completed an interview. Discrimination and trust in physicians were measured using the Everyday Discrimination, Major Experiences of Discrimination, and Trust in Physicians scales, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associating everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with all-cause mortality.
Results: Approximately 43% reported experiencing at least one major experience of discrimination, 16% reported high everyday experiences of discrimination, and the median trust in physician score was 35. The association between higher experiences of everyday discrimination was HR = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.11), compared with low experiences of everyday discrimination. We observed that more major experiences of discrimination had 1.25-times the mortality rate compared with low experiences of major discrimination (95% CI: 0.84, 2.20). Higher trust in physicians was associated with slightly lower mortality rates (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.14).
Conclusion: We observed complexities in the relationships of everyday discrimination, major experiences of discrimination, and trust in physicians with mortality among Black women with ovarian cancer. Future work to understand the these relationships is likely warranted.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach.
The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues.
The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts.
Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.