COVID-19大流行对st段抬高型心肌梗死治疗策略和结局的影响

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522661
Jakub Bychowski, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Sobiczewski, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Marcin Gruchała
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对st段抬高型心肌梗死治疗策略和结局的影响","authors":"Jakub Bychowski, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Sobiczewski, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Marcin Gruchała","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most reliable care quality indicators for STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) include onset-to-door time (OTDT), time from admission to wire crossing and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these selected care quality indicators in pre-pandemic and pandemic groups of STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study, enrolled 480 STEMI patients, aged 63.59 ± 12.44 years treated with pPCI across two time frames: pre-pandemic (<i>n</i> = 331) and pandemic (<i>n</i> = 149). The evaluation criteria included OTDT, time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion, in-hospital mortality, and predictors of time delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed a significant increases in OTDT (median 3 h; IQR 1.5-12.0 vs. median 5 h; IQR 2.0-24.0, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and time from admission to wire crossing (median 92 min; IQR 65.0-187.0 vs. median 115.0; IQR 73.0-233.0, <i>p</i> = 0.025), in the COVID-19 pandemic group of STEMI patients, compared to the pre-pandemic subset. We also observed an increase in in-hospital mortality (7.85% vs. 14.09%, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and incidence of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest (16.62% vs. 26.85%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Additionally, the proportion of patients with prolonged OTDT (24.45% vs. 35.71%, <i>p</i> = 0.019) and extended time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion (51.96% vs. 65.77%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) increased during the pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study's results indicated prolonged OTDT and admission-to-wire crossing times, increased in-hospital mortality, and the higher frequency of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings demonstrate the negative impact of the pandemic on treatment times and outcomes for patients diagnosed with STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1522661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treatment strategy and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Bychowski, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Sobiczewski, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Marcin Gruchała\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most reliable care quality indicators for STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) include onset-to-door time (OTDT), time from admission to wire crossing and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these selected care quality indicators in pre-pandemic and pandemic groups of STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study, enrolled 480 STEMI patients, aged 63.59 ± 12.44 years treated with pPCI across two time frames: pre-pandemic (<i>n</i> = 331) and pandemic (<i>n</i> = 149). The evaluation criteria included OTDT, time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion, in-hospital mortality, and predictors of time delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed a significant increases in OTDT (median 3 h; IQR 1.5-12.0 vs. median 5 h; IQR 2.0-24.0, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and time from admission to wire crossing (median 92 min; IQR 65.0-187.0 vs. median 115.0; IQR 73.0-233.0, <i>p</i> = 0.025), in the COVID-19 pandemic group of STEMI patients, compared to the pre-pandemic subset. We also observed an increase in in-hospital mortality (7.85% vs. 14.09%, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and incidence of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest (16.62% vs. 26.85%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Additionally, the proportion of patients with prolonged OTDT (24.45% vs. 35.71%, <i>p</i> = 0.019) and extended time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion (51.96% vs. 65.77%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) increased during the pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study's results indicated prolonged OTDT and admission-to-wire crossing times, increased in-hospital mortality, and the higher frequency of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings demonstrate the negative impact of the pandemic on treatment times and outcomes for patients diagnosed with STEMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1522661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1522661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:STEMI患者接受原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)最可靠的护理质量指标包括从发病到就诊时间(OTDT)、从入院到过线时间和住院死亡率。目的:我们的研究旨在评估COVID-19大流行对STEMI患者大流行前和大流行组这些选定的护理质量指标的影响。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了480例STEMI患者,年龄63.59±12.44岁,接受pPCI治疗,时间跨度为两个时间段:大流行前(n = 331)和大流行前(n = 149)。评估标准包括OTDT、入院至pci介导的再灌注时间、住院死亡率和时间延迟预测因子。结果:我们的研究显示OTDT显著增加(中位3小时;IQR 1.5 ~ 12.0 vs中位5 h;IQR 2.0 ~ 24.0, p = 0.011)和入院至导线穿越时间(中位92 min;IQR 65.0-187.0 vs中位数115.0;IQR 73.0-233.0, p = 0.025),与大流行前亚组相比。我们还观察到住院死亡率增加(7.85%对14.09%,p = 0.033),心源性休克/心搏停止发生率增加(16.62%对26.85%,p = 0.009)。此外,在大流行期间,OTDT延长(24.45% vs. 35.71%, p = 0.019)和入院至pci介导再灌注时间延长(51.96% vs. 65.77%, p = 0.005)的患者比例增加。结论:研究结果表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,OTDT和入院到电线的穿越时间延长,住院死亡率增加,心源性休克/心脏骤停的频率更高。这些发现表明,大流行对被诊断为STEMI的患者的治疗时间和结果产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treatment strategy and outcomes.

Background: The most reliable care quality indicators for STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) include onset-to-door time (OTDT), time from admission to wire crossing and in-hospital mortality.

Aims: Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these selected care quality indicators in pre-pandemic and pandemic groups of STEMI patients.

Methods: This single-centre, retrospective study, enrolled 480 STEMI patients, aged 63.59 ± 12.44 years treated with pPCI across two time frames: pre-pandemic (n = 331) and pandemic (n = 149). The evaluation criteria included OTDT, time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion, in-hospital mortality, and predictors of time delays.

Results: Our study revealed a significant increases in OTDT (median 3 h; IQR 1.5-12.0 vs. median 5 h; IQR 2.0-24.0, p = 0.011) and time from admission to wire crossing (median 92 min; IQR 65.0-187.0 vs. median 115.0; IQR 73.0-233.0, p = 0.025), in the COVID-19 pandemic group of STEMI patients, compared to the pre-pandemic subset. We also observed an increase in in-hospital mortality (7.85% vs. 14.09%, p = 0.033) and incidence of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest (16.62% vs. 26.85%, p = 0.009). Additionally, the proportion of patients with prolonged OTDT (24.45% vs. 35.71%, p = 0.019) and extended time from admission to PCI-mediated reperfusion (51.96% vs. 65.77%, p = 0.005) increased during the pandemic period.

Conclusions: The study's results indicated prolonged OTDT and admission-to-wire crossing times, increased in-hospital mortality, and the higher frequency of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings demonstrate the negative impact of the pandemic on treatment times and outcomes for patients diagnosed with STEMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信