{"title":"反复握力练习时的心脏压力反射敏感性:与坐立动作和自发休息的比较。","authors":"Wenxing Qin, Marina Fukuie, Daisuke Hoshi, Shoya Mori, Tsubasa Tomoto, Shigehiko Ogoh, Jun Sugawara, Takashi Tarumi","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cardiac baroreflex regulates arterial pressure via autonomic heart rate control. While sit-stand maneuvers (SSM) have been used to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), they may be impractical for physically immobile individuals. This study examined cardiac BRS during repeated handgrip exercise (RHE) compared to SSM and spontaneous rest. Twenty participants (10 females) performed 5-min RHE and SSM at 0.10 and 0.05 Hz in random order after spontaneous rest. Cardiac BRS was calculated using transfer function analysis (BRS<sub>TFA</sub>) and the sequence method (BRS<sub>SM</sub>) in low (LF: 0.05-0.15 Hz) and very low (VLF: 0.02-0.07 Hz) frequencies. Power spectral density (PSD) quantified systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations. Compared to rest, 0.10 and 0.05 Hz RHE significantly increased SBP and RRI PSDs, with the highest values observed during SSM in both frequencies. RHE significantly increased LF and VLF BRS<sub>TFA</sub> coherence by 132% and 142%, while SSM increased them by 144% and 209%. Regardless of analytical methods, BRS remained unchanged during RHE compared to rest, but it significantly decreased during 0.10 Hz SSM, which correlated with increased heart rate. These findings suggest that RHE improves BRS<sub>TFA</sub> estimation via increased coherence, whereas reduced BRS during SSM suggests baroreflex resetting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 9","pages":"e70352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during repeated handgrip exercise: Comparisons with sit-stand maneuvers and spontaneous rest.\",\"authors\":\"Wenxing Qin, Marina Fukuie, Daisuke Hoshi, Shoya Mori, Tsubasa Tomoto, Shigehiko Ogoh, Jun Sugawara, Takashi Tarumi\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cardiac baroreflex regulates arterial pressure via autonomic heart rate control. While sit-stand maneuvers (SSM) have been used to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), they may be impractical for physically immobile individuals. This study examined cardiac BRS during repeated handgrip exercise (RHE) compared to SSM and spontaneous rest. Twenty participants (10 females) performed 5-min RHE and SSM at 0.10 and 0.05 Hz in random order after spontaneous rest. Cardiac BRS was calculated using transfer function analysis (BRS<sub>TFA</sub>) and the sequence method (BRS<sub>SM</sub>) in low (LF: 0.05-0.15 Hz) and very low (VLF: 0.02-0.07 Hz) frequencies. Power spectral density (PSD) quantified systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations. Compared to rest, 0.10 and 0.05 Hz RHE significantly increased SBP and RRI PSDs, with the highest values observed during SSM in both frequencies. RHE significantly increased LF and VLF BRS<sub>TFA</sub> coherence by 132% and 142%, while SSM increased them by 144% and 209%. Regardless of analytical methods, BRS remained unchanged during RHE compared to rest, but it significantly decreased during 0.10 Hz SSM, which correlated with increased heart rate. These findings suggest that RHE improves BRS<sub>TFA</sub> estimation via increased coherence, whereas reduced BRS during SSM suggests baroreflex resetting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e70352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during repeated handgrip exercise: Comparisons with sit-stand maneuvers and spontaneous rest.
The cardiac baroreflex regulates arterial pressure via autonomic heart rate control. While sit-stand maneuvers (SSM) have been used to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), they may be impractical for physically immobile individuals. This study examined cardiac BRS during repeated handgrip exercise (RHE) compared to SSM and spontaneous rest. Twenty participants (10 females) performed 5-min RHE and SSM at 0.10 and 0.05 Hz in random order after spontaneous rest. Cardiac BRS was calculated using transfer function analysis (BRSTFA) and the sequence method (BRSSM) in low (LF: 0.05-0.15 Hz) and very low (VLF: 0.02-0.07 Hz) frequencies. Power spectral density (PSD) quantified systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations. Compared to rest, 0.10 and 0.05 Hz RHE significantly increased SBP and RRI PSDs, with the highest values observed during SSM in both frequencies. RHE significantly increased LF and VLF BRSTFA coherence by 132% and 142%, while SSM increased them by 144% and 209%. Regardless of analytical methods, BRS remained unchanged during RHE compared to rest, but it significantly decreased during 0.10 Hz SSM, which correlated with increased heart rate. These findings suggest that RHE improves BRSTFA estimation via increased coherence, whereas reduced BRS during SSM suggests baroreflex resetting.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.