在脑室-腹膜分流的情况下,无菌腹腔假性囊肿的处理:一个系统的回顾。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
A Shehaj, T Harbaugh, H Wilding, M Mareboina, M Newland, E Rizk
{"title":"在脑室-腹膜分流的情况下,无菌腹腔假性囊肿的处理:一个系统的回顾。","authors":"A Shehaj, T Harbaugh, H Wilding, M Mareboina, M Newland, E Rizk","doi":"10.1007/s00381-025-06823-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review investigates the management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts (APCs), a complication associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Management options for sterile APCs include repositioning and externalization, but there remains no consensus on which management technique is superior in terms of outcomes in recurrence or overall complication rates. Therefore, a comparison of outcomes between shunt externalization and repositioning was conducted. A systematic review was done through PRISMA guidelines, and a search of multiple databases, including Medline and Embase, was conducted from the date of inception until 2023. The search results demonstrated 382 articles. Of the 382 articles, 252 were unique, and 43 articles were included in the analysis after full-text analysis. The results of our analysis indicate there is no significant difference in pseudocyst recurrence and overall complications between externalization and repositioning of the distal shunt catheter. The rate of pseudocyst recurrence for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 25% and 24.1% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.99). The overall complication rate for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 44.4% and 34.5% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.3861). Although our analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the two approaches, further work that includes prospective studies, longer follow-up periods, and larger sample sizes is needed to establish this.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":"41 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts in the context of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"A Shehaj, T Harbaugh, H Wilding, M Mareboina, M Newland, E Rizk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00381-025-06823-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review investigates the management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts (APCs), a complication associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Management options for sterile APCs include repositioning and externalization, but there remains no consensus on which management technique is superior in terms of outcomes in recurrence or overall complication rates. Therefore, a comparison of outcomes between shunt externalization and repositioning was conducted. A systematic review was done through PRISMA guidelines, and a search of multiple databases, including Medline and Embase, was conducted from the date of inception until 2023. The search results demonstrated 382 articles. Of the 382 articles, 252 were unique, and 43 articles were included in the analysis after full-text analysis. The results of our analysis indicate there is no significant difference in pseudocyst recurrence and overall complications between externalization and repositioning of the distal shunt catheter. The rate of pseudocyst recurrence for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 25% and 24.1% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.99). The overall complication rate for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 44.4% and 34.5% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.3861). Although our analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the two approaches, further work that includes prospective studies, longer follow-up periods, and larger sample sizes is needed to establish this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child's Nervous System\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child's Nervous System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-025-06823-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-025-06823-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述探讨无菌腹腔假性囊肿(APCs)的处理,这是一种与脑室-腹膜分流(VPS)相关的并发症。无菌APCs的管理选择包括重新定位和外化,但就复发率或总并发症发生率而言,哪种管理技术更优越仍未达成共识。因此,我们比较了分流外化和重新定位的结果。通过PRISMA指南进行了系统评价,并对多个数据库(包括Medline和Embase)进行了检索,从成立之日起至2023年。搜索结果显示有382篇文章。在这382篇文章中,有252篇是独一无二的,43篇文章在全文分析后被纳入分析。我们的分析结果表明,在假性囊肿复发和总体并发症方面,远端分流导管外置和重新定位没有显著差异。假性囊肿复发率在随访6个月以上的研究中,重新定位和外翻分别为25%和24.1% (p = 0.99)。在随访6个月及以上的研究中,复位和外置的总并发症发生率分别为44.4%和34.5% (p = 0.3861)。虽然我们的分析没有证明两种方法之间有显著差异,但需要进一步的工作,包括前瞻性研究、更长的随访期和更大的样本量来确定这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts in the context of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a systematic review.

This systematic review investigates the management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts (APCs), a complication associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Management options for sterile APCs include repositioning and externalization, but there remains no consensus on which management technique is superior in terms of outcomes in recurrence or overall complication rates. Therefore, a comparison of outcomes between shunt externalization and repositioning was conducted. A systematic review was done through PRISMA guidelines, and a search of multiple databases, including Medline and Embase, was conducted from the date of inception until 2023. The search results demonstrated 382 articles. Of the 382 articles, 252 were unique, and 43 articles were included in the analysis after full-text analysis. The results of our analysis indicate there is no significant difference in pseudocyst recurrence and overall complications between externalization and repositioning of the distal shunt catheter. The rate of pseudocyst recurrence for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 25% and 24.1% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.99). The overall complication rate for studies with a follow-up of 6 or more months was 44.4% and 34.5% for repositioning and externalization, respectively (p = 0.3861). Although our analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the two approaches, further work that includes prospective studies, longer follow-up periods, and larger sample sizes is needed to establish this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信