皮下组织关闭和引流在肥胖妇女择期剖宫产中的价值:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mohamed A Shalaby, Hanan H M Metwally, Ahmed M Maged, Yomna A Bayoumi, Noha Salah
{"title":"皮下组织关闭和引流在肥胖妇女择期剖宫产中的价值:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Mohamed A Shalaby, Hanan H M Metwally, Ahmed M Maged, Yomna A Bayoumi, Noha Salah","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07579-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous suture reapproximation alone versus suture plus subcutaneous drain or non-closure for the prevention of wound complications in obese women undergoing elective cesarean delivery (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled open label trial was conducted on 352 obese women candidates for elective CD. Participants were randomized into 4 groups: group I (n = 89) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue with insertion of subrectus drain, group II (n = 88) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue, group III (n = 88) were allocated for insertion of subrectus drain, group IV (n = 87) were allocated for non-closure of subcutaneous tissue without insertion of subrectus drain The primary outcome parameter was the development of wound complications including seroma, infection and dehiscence. Secondary outcome included postoperative pain assessed by VAS, postoperative fever, time of hospital stay and duration of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between the 4 groups regarding the mean duration of surgery (48.67 ± 2.84, 46.56 ± 4.80, 45.95 ± 4.29, and 41.59 ± 5.08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively, P < 0.001). Assessment of outcome parameters revealed significant differences between the 4 groups regarding postoperative pain (2.93 ± 1.95, 3.62 ± 2.26, 3.83 ± 2.16, and 3.99 ± 2.032, P = 0.006), postoperative fever (3/68 (3.5%),5/86 (5.8%),3/68 (3.5%),, and 12/86 (14%), P = 0.017) wound infection (4/68 (4.7%),7/86 (8.1%),4/68 (4.7%),, and 13/86 (15.1%), P = 0.035) and wound dehiscence (4/68 (4.7%),6/86 (7%),8/68 (9.3%),, and 16/86 (18.6%), P = 0.011) and highly statistical significant differences regarding wound seroma (4/68 (4.7%),13/86 (15.1%),6/68 (7%),, and 21/86 (24.4%), P < 0.001) and redressing(10/68 (11.6%),17/86 (19.8%),19/68 (22.1%), and 32/86 (37.2%), P < 0.001) 08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional use of a subcutaneous drain along with a standard subcutaneous suture reapproximation technique is effective for the prevention of wound complications named seroma, redressing, dehiscence and infection in obese women undergoing CD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04177381 Date of registration: 21/11/2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of subcutaneous tissue closure and drain in obese women undergo elective caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed A Shalaby, Hanan H M Metwally, Ahmed M Maged, Yomna A Bayoumi, Noha Salah\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07579-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous suture reapproximation alone versus suture plus subcutaneous drain or non-closure for the prevention of wound complications in obese women undergoing elective cesarean delivery (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled open label trial was conducted on 352 obese women candidates for elective CD. Participants were randomized into 4 groups: group I (n = 89) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue with insertion of subrectus drain, group II (n = 88) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue, group III (n = 88) were allocated for insertion of subrectus drain, group IV (n = 87) were allocated for non-closure of subcutaneous tissue without insertion of subrectus drain The primary outcome parameter was the development of wound complications including seroma, infection and dehiscence. Secondary outcome included postoperative pain assessed by VAS, postoperative fever, time of hospital stay and duration of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between the 4 groups regarding the mean duration of surgery (48.67 ± 2.84, 46.56 ± 4.80, 45.95 ± 4.29, and 41.59 ± 5.08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively, P < 0.001). Assessment of outcome parameters revealed significant differences between the 4 groups regarding postoperative pain (2.93 ± 1.95, 3.62 ± 2.26, 3.83 ± 2.16, and 3.99 ± 2.032, P = 0.006), postoperative fever (3/68 (3.5%),5/86 (5.8%),3/68 (3.5%),, and 12/86 (14%), P = 0.017) wound infection (4/68 (4.7%),7/86 (8.1%),4/68 (4.7%),, and 13/86 (15.1%), P = 0.035) and wound dehiscence (4/68 (4.7%),6/86 (7%),8/68 (9.3%),, and 16/86 (18.6%), P = 0.011) and highly statistical significant differences regarding wound seroma (4/68 (4.7%),13/86 (15.1%),6/68 (7%),, and 21/86 (24.4%), P < 0.001) and redressing(10/68 (11.6%),17/86 (19.8%),19/68 (22.1%), and 32/86 (37.2%), P < 0.001) 08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The additional use of a subcutaneous drain along with a standard subcutaneous suture reapproximation technique is effective for the prevention of wound complications named seroma, redressing, dehiscence and infection in obese women undergoing CD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04177381 Date of registration: 21/11/2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054301/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07579-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07579-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较单纯皮下缝合复位与缝合加皮下引流或不缝合预防肥胖妇女择期剖宫产(CD)创面并发症的疗效和安全性。方法:该随机对照开放标签试验对352名肥胖女性选择性CD患者进行了研究。参与者被随机分为4组:ⅰ组(n = 89)为间断闭合皮下组织并插入直下肌引流管组,ⅱ组(n = 88)为间断闭合皮下组织组,ⅲ组(n = 88)为插入直下肌引流管组,ⅳ组(n = 87)为不闭合皮下组织而不插入直下肌引流管组。主要结局参数为伤口并发症(包括血肿、感染和裂开)的发生情况。次要结局包括VAS评估的术后疼痛、术后发热、住院时间和手术时间。结果:4组患者的平均手术时间分别为:联合组(48.67±2.84)、单缝线组(46.56±4.80)、单引流组(45.95±4.29)、单引流组(41.59±5.08),差异有统计学意义。额外使用皮下引流以及标准的皮下缝合重新近似技术,可有效预防肥胖女性接受cd的伤口并发症,如血肿、修复、裂开和感染。试验注册:NCT04177381注册日期:21/11/2019。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of subcutaneous tissue closure and drain in obese women undergo elective caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous suture reapproximation alone versus suture plus subcutaneous drain or non-closure for the prevention of wound complications in obese women undergoing elective cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods: This randomized controlled open label trial was conducted on 352 obese women candidates for elective CD. Participants were randomized into 4 groups: group I (n = 89) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue with insertion of subrectus drain, group II (n = 88) were allocated for interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue, group III (n = 88) were allocated for insertion of subrectus drain, group IV (n = 87) were allocated for non-closure of subcutaneous tissue without insertion of subrectus drain The primary outcome parameter was the development of wound complications including seroma, infection and dehiscence. Secondary outcome included postoperative pain assessed by VAS, postoperative fever, time of hospital stay and duration of surgery.

Results: There were significant differences between the 4 groups regarding the mean duration of surgery (48.67 ± 2.84, 46.56 ± 4.80, 45.95 ± 4.29, and 41.59 ± 5.08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively, P < 0.001). Assessment of outcome parameters revealed significant differences between the 4 groups regarding postoperative pain (2.93 ± 1.95, 3.62 ± 2.26, 3.83 ± 2.16, and 3.99 ± 2.032, P = 0.006), postoperative fever (3/68 (3.5%),5/86 (5.8%),3/68 (3.5%),, and 12/86 (14%), P = 0.017) wound infection (4/68 (4.7%),7/86 (8.1%),4/68 (4.7%),, and 13/86 (15.1%), P = 0.035) and wound dehiscence (4/68 (4.7%),6/86 (7%),8/68 (9.3%),, and 16/86 (18.6%), P = 0.011) and highly statistical significant differences regarding wound seroma (4/68 (4.7%),13/86 (15.1%),6/68 (7%),, and 21/86 (24.4%), P < 0.001) and redressing(10/68 (11.6%),17/86 (19.8%),19/68 (22.1%), and 32/86 (37.2%), P < 0.001) 08 in combined, sutures only, drain only and none groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The additional use of a subcutaneous drain along with a standard subcutaneous suture reapproximation technique is effective for the prevention of wound complications named seroma, redressing, dehiscence and infection in obese women undergoing CD.

Trial registration: NCT04177381 Date of registration: 21/11/2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信