Shiyi Tao, Lintong Yu, Jun Li, Ji Wu, Xuanchun Huang, Zicong Xie, Tiantian Xue, Yonghao Li, Lilan Su
{"title":"通过估计葡萄糖处置率量化胰岛素抵抗预测心血管疾病发病率:一项全国前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Shiyi Tao, Lintong Yu, Jun Li, Ji Wu, Xuanchun Huang, Zicong Xie, Tiantian Xue, Yonghao Li, Lilan Su","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02672-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance (IR) is an important pathologic component in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a measure of glucose handling capacity, that has demonstrated utility as a reliable marker of IR. The study aimed to determine the predictive utility of IR assessed by eGDR for CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide prospective cohort study utilized data of 6416 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) who were free of CVD but had complete data on eGDR at baseline. The Boruta algorithm was performed for feature selection. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were conducted to examine the associations between eGDR and CVD, and the results were expressed with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of eGDR in identifying CVD. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the potential association of with CVD in different populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 106.5 months, 1339 (20.87%) incident CVD cases, including 1025 (15.96%) heart disease and 439 (6.84%) stroke, were recorded from CHARLS. The RCS curves demonstrated a significant and linear relationship between eGDR and all endpoints (all P for nonlinear > 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the lower eGDR levels were found to be significantly associated with a greater prevalence of CVD. Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest eGDR quartile was associated with a decreased risk of CVD (HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.545-0.862). When assessed as a continuous variable, individuals with a unit increasement in eGDR was related to a 21.2% (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.669-0.929) lower risk of CVD, a 18.3% (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.678-0.985) decreased risk of heart disease, and 39.5% (HR 0.705, 95% CI 0.539-0.923) lower risk of stroke. The eGDR had an excellent predictive performance according to the results of ROC (AUC = 0.712) and χ<sup>2</sup> likelihood ratio test (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.876, P = 0.771). NRI and DCA analysis also suggested the improvement from eGDR to identify prevalent CVD and the favorable clinical efficacy of the multivariate model. Subgroup analysis revealed that the trend in incident CVD risk were broadly consistent with the main results across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower level of eGDR was found to be associated with increased risk of incident CVD, suggesting that eGDR may serve as a promising and preferable predictor for CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin resistance quantified by estimated glucose disposal rate predicts cardiovascular disease incidence: a nationwide prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Shiyi Tao, Lintong Yu, Jun Li, Ji Wu, Xuanchun Huang, Zicong Xie, Tiantian Xue, Yonghao Li, Lilan Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12933-025-02672-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance (IR) is an important pathologic component in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a measure of glucose handling capacity, that has demonstrated utility as a reliable marker of IR. The study aimed to determine the predictive utility of IR assessed by eGDR for CVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide prospective cohort study utilized data of 6416 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) who were free of CVD but had complete data on eGDR at baseline. The Boruta algorithm was performed for feature selection. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were conducted to examine the associations between eGDR and CVD, and the results were expressed with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of eGDR in identifying CVD. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the potential association of with CVD in different populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 106.5 months, 1339 (20.87%) incident CVD cases, including 1025 (15.96%) heart disease and 439 (6.84%) stroke, were recorded from CHARLS. The RCS curves demonstrated a significant and linear relationship between eGDR and all endpoints (all P for nonlinear > 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the lower eGDR levels were found to be significantly associated with a greater prevalence of CVD. Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest eGDR quartile was associated with a decreased risk of CVD (HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.545-0.862). When assessed as a continuous variable, individuals with a unit increasement in eGDR was related to a 21.2% (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.669-0.929) lower risk of CVD, a 18.3% (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.678-0.985) decreased risk of heart disease, and 39.5% (HR 0.705, 95% CI 0.539-0.923) lower risk of stroke. The eGDR had an excellent predictive performance according to the results of ROC (AUC = 0.712) and χ<sup>2</sup> likelihood ratio test (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.876, P = 0.771). NRI and DCA analysis also suggested the improvement from eGDR to identify prevalent CVD and the favorable clinical efficacy of the multivariate model. Subgroup analysis revealed that the trend in incident CVD risk were broadly consistent with the main results across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower level of eGDR was found to be associated with increased risk of incident CVD, suggesting that eGDR may serve as a promising and preferable predictor for CVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02672-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02672-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胰岛素抵抗(Insulin resistance, IR)是心血管疾病(CVD)发生发展的重要病理因素。估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)是葡萄糖处理能力的量度,已被证明是IR的可靠标志。该研究旨在确定由eGDR评估的IR对心血管疾病风险的预测效用。方法:这项全国范围的前瞻性队列研究使用了来自中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的6416名参与者的数据,这些参与者没有心血管疾病,但基线时具有完整的eGDR数据。采用Boruta算法进行特征选择。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型和限制性三次样条(RCS)分析来检验eGDR与CVD之间的相关性,结果用风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)值表示。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、校正曲线、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验、净重分类改善(NRI)、决策曲线分析(DCA)评价eGDR鉴别心血管疾病的临床疗效。进行亚组分析,探讨不同人群与心血管疾病的潜在关联。结果:在中位随访106.5个月期间,CHARLS记录了1339例(20.87%)CVD事件,其中心脏病1025例(15.96%),卒中439例(6.84%)。RCS曲线显示eGDR与所有终点之间存在显著的线性关系(非线性均为P < 0.05)。在多因素调整后,发现较低的eGDR水平与较高的心血管疾病患病率显著相关。与最低四分位数相比,最高eGDR四分位数与心血管疾病风险降低相关(HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.545-0.862)。当作为一个连续变量评估时,eGDR单位增加的个体与心血管疾病风险降低21.2% (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.669-0.929)、心脏病风险降低18.3% (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.678-0.985)和中风风险降低39.5% (HR 0.705, 95% CI 0.539-0.923)相关。ROC (AUC = 0.712)和χ2似然比检验(χ2 = 4.876, P = 0.771)结果表明,eGDR具有较好的预测效果。NRI和DCA分析也表明eGDR在识别流行心血管疾病方面的改进和多变量模型的良好临床疗效。亚组分析显示,发生心血管疾病风险的趋势与各亚组的主要结果大致一致。结论:较低水平的eGDR与CVD发生风险增加相关,提示eGDR可能是CVD的一个有希望和更好的预测指标。
Insulin resistance quantified by estimated glucose disposal rate predicts cardiovascular disease incidence: a nationwide prospective cohort study.
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is an important pathologic component in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a measure of glucose handling capacity, that has demonstrated utility as a reliable marker of IR. The study aimed to determine the predictive utility of IR assessed by eGDR for CVD risk.
Methods: This nationwide prospective cohort study utilized data of 6416 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) who were free of CVD but had complete data on eGDR at baseline. The Boruta algorithm was performed for feature selection. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were conducted to examine the associations between eGDR and CVD, and the results were expressed with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of eGDR in identifying CVD. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the potential association of with CVD in different populations.
Results: During a median follow-up of 106.5 months, 1339 (20.87%) incident CVD cases, including 1025 (15.96%) heart disease and 439 (6.84%) stroke, were recorded from CHARLS. The RCS curves demonstrated a significant and linear relationship between eGDR and all endpoints (all P for nonlinear > 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the lower eGDR levels were found to be significantly associated with a greater prevalence of CVD. Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest eGDR quartile was associated with a decreased risk of CVD (HR 0.686, 95% CI 0.545-0.862). When assessed as a continuous variable, individuals with a unit increasement in eGDR was related to a 21.2% (HR 0.788, 95% CI 0.669-0.929) lower risk of CVD, a 18.3% (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.678-0.985) decreased risk of heart disease, and 39.5% (HR 0.705, 95% CI 0.539-0.923) lower risk of stroke. The eGDR had an excellent predictive performance according to the results of ROC (AUC = 0.712) and χ2 likelihood ratio test (χ2 = 4.876, P = 0.771). NRI and DCA analysis also suggested the improvement from eGDR to identify prevalent CVD and the favorable clinical efficacy of the multivariate model. Subgroup analysis revealed that the trend in incident CVD risk were broadly consistent with the main results across subgroups.
Conclusion: A lower level of eGDR was found to be associated with increased risk of incident CVD, suggesting that eGDR may serve as a promising and preferable predictor for CVD.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.