气功和太极对癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Jing Xu, Hong Li, Daniel Man-Yuen Sze, Vincent Wan Shing Chan, Angela Wei Hong Yang
{"title":"气功和太极对癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jing Xu, Hong Li, Daniel Man-Yuen Sze, Vincent Wan Shing Chan, Angela Wei Hong Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-04875-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Qigong and Tai Chi (QTC) have been adopted by cancer patients as the complementary treatment to their conventional care. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of QTC in cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) and its safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five databases were searched from their respective inception to March 2025. Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing cancer patients' QoL after practicing QTC were included. The search strategy included Qigong, Tai Chi, quality of life, cancer, systematic review, and meta analysis. The extracted data was analyzed using standardized mean difference, mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine SRs were included in the qualitative analysis, and six of the SRs were included for the meta-analyses. Results showed that QTC may improve cancer patients' overall QoL, physiological scores (physical functioning, fatigue, and sleep quality), psychological scores (mental health and anxiety), and immunity, compared to the control groups. However, meta-analyses did not demonstrate significant differences in subgroup analyses of depression, although it showed that QTC may reduce depression in cancer patients. No serious adverse events of QTC were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QTC can be considered a safe intervention method for improving QoL in patients with cancer. Due to substantial heterogeneity, more rigorously-designed RCTs on QTC for cancer patients should be conducted, focusing on standardizing QTC practices and QoL instruments to assess QTC effects.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021253216.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of qigong and Tai Chi for quality of life in patients with cancer: an umbrella review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Xu, Hong Li, Daniel Man-Yuen Sze, Vincent Wan Shing Chan, Angela Wei Hong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12906-025-04875-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Qigong and Tai Chi (QTC) have been adopted by cancer patients as the complementary treatment to their conventional care. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of QTC in cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) and its safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five databases were searched from their respective inception to March 2025. Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing cancer patients' QoL after practicing QTC were included. The search strategy included Qigong, Tai Chi, quality of life, cancer, systematic review, and meta analysis. The extracted data was analyzed using standardized mean difference, mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine SRs were included in the qualitative analysis, and six of the SRs were included for the meta-analyses. Results showed that QTC may improve cancer patients' overall QoL, physiological scores (physical functioning, fatigue, and sleep quality), psychological scores (mental health and anxiety), and immunity, compared to the control groups. However, meta-analyses did not demonstrate significant differences in subgroup analyses of depression, although it showed that QTC may reduce depression in cancer patients. No serious adverse events of QTC were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QTC can be considered a safe intervention method for improving QoL in patients with cancer. Due to substantial heterogeneity, more rigorously-designed RCTs on QTC for cancer patients should be conducted, focusing on standardizing QTC practices and QoL instruments to assess QTC effects.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021253216.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-04875-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-04875-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气功和太极(QTC)已被癌症患者作为常规护理的补充治疗。本综述旨在评价QTC对癌症患者生活质量(QoL)的临床疗效及其安全性。方法:对25个数据库进行检索,检索时间为各数据库成立至2025年3月。纳入评估癌症患者实施QTC后生活质量的随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析。搜索策略包括气功、太极、生活质量、癌症、系统评价和元分析。提取的数据采用标准化均差、均差或95%置信区间的比值比进行分析。结果:9个SRs被纳入定性分析,6个SRs被纳入meta分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,QTC可改善癌症患者的总体生活质量、生理评分(身体功能、疲劳和睡眠质量)、心理评分(心理健康和焦虑)和免疫力。然而,meta分析并没有显示抑郁症亚组分析的显著差异,尽管它显示QTC可能减少癌症患者的抑郁。未见QTC严重不良事件的报道。结论:QTC可作为改善肿瘤患者生活质量的安全干预手段。由于存在较大的异质性,需要对癌症患者的QTC进行更严格设计的随机对照试验,重点是标准化QTC实践和QoL工具,以评估QTC的效果。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021253216。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of qigong and Tai Chi for quality of life in patients with cancer: an umbrella review and meta-analysis.

Background: Qigong and Tai Chi (QTC) have been adopted by cancer patients as the complementary treatment to their conventional care. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of QTC in cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) and its safety.

Methods: Twenty-five databases were searched from their respective inception to March 2025. Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing cancer patients' QoL after practicing QTC were included. The search strategy included Qigong, Tai Chi, quality of life, cancer, systematic review, and meta analysis. The extracted data was analyzed using standardized mean difference, mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Nine SRs were included in the qualitative analysis, and six of the SRs were included for the meta-analyses. Results showed that QTC may improve cancer patients' overall QoL, physiological scores (physical functioning, fatigue, and sleep quality), psychological scores (mental health and anxiety), and immunity, compared to the control groups. However, meta-analyses did not demonstrate significant differences in subgroup analyses of depression, although it showed that QTC may reduce depression in cancer patients. No serious adverse events of QTC were reported.

Conclusion: QTC can be considered a safe intervention method for improving QoL in patients with cancer. Due to substantial heterogeneity, more rigorously-designed RCTs on QTC for cancer patients should be conducted, focusing on standardizing QTC practices and QoL instruments to assess QTC effects.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021253216.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信