验证人工智能算法LuxIA筛选糖尿病视网膜病变从单一的45°视网膜彩色眼底图像:卡片研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rodrigo Abreu-Gonzalez, Gabriela Susanna-González, Joseph P M Blair, Romina M Lasagni Vitar, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Sandro De Zanet, José Natán Rodríguez Martín, Carlos Bermúdez, Alfonso Luis Calle Pascual, Elena Rigo, Enrique Cervera Taulet, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Rosario Cobo-Soriano, Juan Donate-Lopez
{"title":"验证人工智能算法LuxIA筛选糖尿病视网膜病变从单一的45°视网膜彩色眼底图像:卡片研究。","authors":"Rodrigo Abreu-Gonzalez, Gabriela Susanna-González, Joseph P M Blair, Romina M Lasagni Vitar, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Sandro De Zanet, José Natán Rodríguez Martín, Carlos Bermúdez, Alfonso Luis Calle Pascual, Elena Rigo, Enrique Cervera Taulet, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Rosario Cobo-Soriano, Juan Donate-Lopez","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study validated the artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm LuxIA for screening more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR) from a single 45° colour fundus image of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM, type 1 or type 2) in Spain. Secondary objectives included validating LuxIA according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) classification and comparing its performance between different devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, cross-sectional study, retinal colour fundus images of adults (≥18 years) with DM were collected from five hospitals in Spain (December 2021-December 2022). 45° colour fundus photographs were captured using non-mydriatic Topcon and ZEISS cameras. The Discovery platform (RetinAI) was used to collect images. LuxIA output was an ordinal score (1-5), indicating a classification as mtmDR based on an ICDR severity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>945 patients with DM were included; the mean (SD) age was 64.6 (13.5) years. The LuxIA algorithm detected mtmDR with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 94.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96, indicating a high test accuracy. The 95% CI data for overall accuracy (94.8% to 95.6%), sensitivity (96.8% to 98.2%) and specificity (94.3% to 95.1%) indicated robust estimations by LuxIA, which maintained a concordance of classification (N=829, kappa=0.837, p=0.001) when used to classify Topcon images. LuxIA validation on ZEISS-obtained images demonstrated high accuracy (90.6%), specificity (92.3%) and lower sensitivity (83.3%) as compared with Topcon-obtained images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI algorithms such as LuxIA are increasing testing feasibility for healthcare professionals in DR screening. This study validates the real-world utility of LuxIA for mtmDR screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of artificial intelligence algorithm LuxIA for screening of diabetic retinopathy from a single 45° retinal colour fundus images: the CARDS study.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Abreu-Gonzalez, Gabriela Susanna-González, Joseph P M Blair, Romina M Lasagni Vitar, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Sandro De Zanet, José Natán Rodríguez Martín, Carlos Bermúdez, Alfonso Luis Calle Pascual, Elena Rigo, Enrique Cervera Taulet, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Rosario Cobo-Soriano, Juan Donate-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study validated the artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm LuxIA for screening more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR) from a single 45° colour fundus image of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM, type 1 or type 2) in Spain. Secondary objectives included validating LuxIA according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) classification and comparing its performance between different devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, cross-sectional study, retinal colour fundus images of adults (≥18 years) with DM were collected from five hospitals in Spain (December 2021-December 2022). 45° colour fundus photographs were captured using non-mydriatic Topcon and ZEISS cameras. The Discovery platform (RetinAI) was used to collect images. LuxIA output was an ordinal score (1-5), indicating a classification as mtmDR based on an ICDR severity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>945 patients with DM were included; the mean (SD) age was 64.6 (13.5) years. The LuxIA algorithm detected mtmDR with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 94.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96, indicating a high test accuracy. The 95% CI data for overall accuracy (94.8% to 95.6%), sensitivity (96.8% to 98.2%) and specificity (94.3% to 95.1%) indicated robust estimations by LuxIA, which maintained a concordance of classification (N=829, kappa=0.837, p=0.001) when used to classify Topcon images. LuxIA validation on ZEISS-obtained images demonstrated high accuracy (90.6%), specificity (92.3%) and lower sensitivity (83.3%) as compared with Topcon-obtained images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI algorithms such as LuxIA are increasing testing feasibility for healthcare professionals in DR screening. This study validates the real-world utility of LuxIA for mtmDR screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067837/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究验证了基于人工智能(AI)的LuxIA算法用于从西班牙糖尿病(DM, 1型或2型)患者的单张45°彩色眼底图像中筛查轻度以上糖尿病视网膜病变(mtmDR)。次要目标包括根据国际临床糖尿病视网膜病变(ICDR)分类验证LuxIA,并比较其在不同设备之间的性能。方法:在这项多中心横断面研究中,收集了西班牙五家医院(2021年12月- 2022年12月)成人(≥18岁)糖尿病患者的视网膜彩色眼底图像。使用Topcon和ZEISS非散光相机拍摄45°彩色眼底照片。使用Discovery平台(RetinAI)采集图像。LuxIA输出是一个序数评分(1-5),表明根据ICDR严重程度评分分类为mtmDR。结果:纳入DM患者945例;平均(SD)年龄为64.6(13.5)岁。LuxIA算法检测mtmDR的灵敏度和特异性分别为97.1%和94.8%。受测者-工作特性曲线下面积为0.96,测试精度较高。总体准确率(94.8% ~ 95.6%)、灵敏度(96.8% ~ 98.2%)和特异性(94.3% ~ 95.1%)的95% CI数据表明LuxIA的估计是稳健的,当用于Topcon图像分类时,LuxIA保持了分类的一致性(N=829, kappa=0.837, p=0.001)。与topcon获得的图像相比,zeiss获得的图像的LuxIA验证具有较高的准确性(90.6%),特异性(92.3%)和较低的灵敏度(83.3%)。结论:LuxIA等人工智能算法正在提高医疗保健专业人员在DR筛查中的测试可行性。本研究验证了LuxIA在mtmDR筛查中的实际效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of artificial intelligence algorithm LuxIA for screening of diabetic retinopathy from a single 45° retinal colour fundus images: the CARDS study.

Objective: This study validated the artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm LuxIA for screening more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR) from a single 45° colour fundus image of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM, type 1 or type 2) in Spain. Secondary objectives included validating LuxIA according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) classification and comparing its performance between different devices.

Methods: In this multicentre, cross-sectional study, retinal colour fundus images of adults (≥18 years) with DM were collected from five hospitals in Spain (December 2021-December 2022). 45° colour fundus photographs were captured using non-mydriatic Topcon and ZEISS cameras. The Discovery platform (RetinAI) was used to collect images. LuxIA output was an ordinal score (1-5), indicating a classification as mtmDR based on an ICDR severity score.

Results: 945 patients with DM were included; the mean (SD) age was 64.6 (13.5) years. The LuxIA algorithm detected mtmDR with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 94.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96, indicating a high test accuracy. The 95% CI data for overall accuracy (94.8% to 95.6%), sensitivity (96.8% to 98.2%) and specificity (94.3% to 95.1%) indicated robust estimations by LuxIA, which maintained a concordance of classification (N=829, kappa=0.837, p=0.001) when used to classify Topcon images. LuxIA validation on ZEISS-obtained images demonstrated high accuracy (90.6%), specificity (92.3%) and lower sensitivity (83.3%) as compared with Topcon-obtained images.

Conclusions: AI algorithms such as LuxIA are increasing testing feasibility for healthcare professionals in DR screening. This study validates the real-world utility of LuxIA for mtmDR screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信