埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题区(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Kalayou K Berhe, Lilian T Mselle, Haftu B Gebru
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题区(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。","authors":"Kalayou K Berhe, Lilian T Mselle, Haftu B Gebru","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the \"Diabetes distress\" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, \"lack of confidence,\" \"food-related problem,\" and \"support-related problem\" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Kalayou K Berhe, Lilian T Mselle, Haftu B Gebru\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the \\\"Diabetes distress\\\" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, \\\"lack of confidence,\\\" \\\"food-related problem,\\\" and \\\"support-related problem\\\" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病问题区(PAID)量表的心理测量特性。结果:埃塞俄比亚糖尿病问题区(Eth-PAID)量表的验证性因子分析表明,模型适合于1、2、3和4个因素结构。单因素模型Eth-PAID-20量表具有较好的内部一致性(α = 0.82),但“糖尿病痛苦”子量表的二、三、四因素结构部分满足内部一致性(α = 0.74-77)。Eth-PAID-20量表与自我护理效能负相关(r = 0.131, P = 0.06),与空腹血糖(FBS)水平正相关(r = 0.02, P = 0.86),表明其收敛效度较差。此外,二因子、三因子和四因子模型的“缺乏信心”、“食物相关问题”和“支持相关问题”子类显示出非常弱的收敛效度。判别效度显示,女性患者(30.16±13.11),t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4)和独居患者(28.05±12.98),t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5)在单因素Eth-PAID-20模型中窘迫得分显著高于独居患者(28.05±12.98)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.

Objective: to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Results: The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the "Diabetes distress" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, "lack of confidence," "food-related problem," and "support-related problem" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信