{"title":"埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病问题区(PAID)量表的心理测量评估:一项工具验证研究。","authors":"Kalayou K Berhe, Lilian T Mselle, Haftu B Gebru","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the \"Diabetes distress\" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, \"lack of confidence,\" \"food-related problem,\" and \"support-related problem\" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Kalayou K Berhe, Lilian T Mselle, Haftu B Gebru\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the \\\"Diabetes distress\\\" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, \\\"lack of confidence,\\\" \\\"food-related problem,\\\" and \\\"support-related problem\\\" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07238-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病问题区(PAID)量表的心理测量特性。结果:埃塞俄比亚糖尿病问题区(Eth-PAID)量表的验证性因子分析表明,模型适合于1、2、3和4个因素结构。单因素模型Eth-PAID-20量表具有较好的内部一致性(α = 0.82),但“糖尿病痛苦”子量表的二、三、四因素结构部分满足内部一致性(α = 0.74-77)。Eth-PAID-20量表与自我护理效能负相关(r = 0.131, P = 0.06),与空腹血糖(FBS)水平正相关(r = 0.02, P = 0.86),表明其收敛效度较差。此外,二因子、三因子和四因子模型的“缺乏信心”、“食物相关问题”和“支持相关问题”子类显示出非常弱的收敛效度。判别效度显示,女性患者(30.16±13.11),t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4)和独居患者(28.05±12.98),t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5)在单因素Eth-PAID-20模型中窘迫得分显著高于独居患者(28.05±12.98)。
Psychometric evaluation of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale among people with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia: a tool validation study.
Objective: to assesses the psychometric properties of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale for Ethiopian patients with type 2 diabetes.
Results: The confirmatory factor analysis for the Ethiopian Problem Area in Diabetes (Eth-PAID) scales demonstrated good model fit to the one, two, three, and four factor structures. The one-factor model Eth-PAID-20 scale showed acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.82), but the "Diabetes distress" subscale of two, three, and four-factor structures partially satisfied the internal consistency (ranged α = 0.74-77). The Eth-PAID-20 scale correlated negatively with self-care efficacy (r = 0.131, P = 0.06) and positively with Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level (r = 0.02, P = 0.86), which implies poor convergent validity. Moreover, "lack of confidence," "food-related problem," and "support-related problem" subclasses of two, three, and four-factor models showed very weak convergent validity. Discriminative validity revealed that female patients (30.16 ± 13.11), t = - 2.73, p = 0.007, d = 0.4) and patients who lived alone (28.05 ± 12.98), t = 2.542, p = 0.021, d = 0.5) had significantly higher distress scores in Eth-PAID-20 as one factor model.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.