{"title":"硬膜外脉冲射频治疗持续性脊柱疼痛综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性临床研究。","authors":"Burak Erken, Gunay Yolcu, Tuba Tanyel Saracoglu","doi":"10.1155/prm/6200102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. <b>Methodology:</b> In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. <b>Result:</b> In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6200102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Burak Erken, Gunay Yolcu, Tuba Tanyel Saracoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/6200102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. <b>Methodology:</b> In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. <b>Result:</b> In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"6200102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6200102\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6200102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Background: Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. Methodology: In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. Result: In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. Conclusion: The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.
期刊介绍:
Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management.
The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.