硬膜外脉冲射频治疗持续性脊柱疼痛综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性临床研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/6200102
Burak Erken, Gunay Yolcu, Tuba Tanyel Saracoglu
{"title":"硬膜外脉冲射频治疗持续性脊柱疼痛综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性临床研究。","authors":"Burak Erken, Gunay Yolcu, Tuba Tanyel Saracoglu","doi":"10.1155/prm/6200102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. <b>Methodology:</b> In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. <b>Result:</b> In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6200102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Burak Erken, Gunay Yolcu, Tuba Tanyel Saracoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/6200102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. <b>Methodology:</b> In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. <b>Result:</b> In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. <b>Conclusion:</b> The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"6200102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6200102\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/6200102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型持续性脊柱疼痛综合征(PSPS-II)是一种以剧烈疼痛为特征的慢性疾病,可导致残疾和生活质量显著降低。尽管应用了广泛的介入性疼痛治疗,但根据病因的复杂性,硬膜外脉冲射频(EPRF)应用近年来已成为一种越来越受欢迎的方法。目的:本研究的目的是探讨EPRF在诊断为PSPS-II的患者中的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性设计的研究中,对保守治疗和硬膜外类固醇注射无反应的PSPS-II患者进行透视引导下的EPRF。术前、术后1个月和3个月分别用数字评定量表(NRS)评估患者的疼痛严重程度,用双神经性疼痛量表(DN-4)评估患者是否存在神经性疼痛。虽然将NRS评分的变化作为主要结局指标,但根据DN-4确定神经性疼痛患者人数的变化作为次要结局指标。结果:在最后的分析中,对42例患者的数据进行了评估。对NRS随时间变化的分析显示,与最初的测量相比,第一个月和第三个月的分数在统计学上显著降低。与基线相比,第一个月根据DN-4问卷诊断为神经性疼痛的患者数量显著减少。然而,在第三个月没有注意到明显的变化。结论:应用EPRF治疗PSPS-II型慢性神经根痛在短期内是有效的。需要进一步的研究来确定其长期影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06239857。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Background: Persistent spinal pain syndrome type-2 (PSPS-II) is a chronic condition that is characterized by severe pain and results in disability and a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the wide range of interventional pain treatments that are applied, depending on the complexity of the etiology, epidural pulsed radiofrequency (EPRF) application has emerged as an approach that has gained popularity in recent years. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of EPRF in patients diagnosed with PSPS-II. Methodology: In this prospectively designed study, patients with PSPS-II who had not responded to conservative treatments and epidural steroid injections were subjected to fluoroscopy-guided EPRF. Patients were evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4) questionnaire for presence of neuropathic pain before the procedure and at one and three months after. Although the change in NRS score was established as the primary outcome measure, the change in the number of patients with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 was determined as the secondary outcome measure. Result: In the final analysis, data from 42 patients were evaluated. The analysis of the time-dependent change in NRS revealed a statistically significant reduction in the scores for the first and third months, in comparison with the initial measurement. A significant decrease was observed in the number of patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to the DN-4 questionnaire in the first month, in comparison with the baseline. However, no significant change was noted in the third month. Conclusion: The utilization of EPRF for the treatment of chronic radicular pain in the setting of PSPS-II appears to be effective in the short term. Further studies are required to ascertain its long-term effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06239857.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信