预防婴儿不对称的指导策略:系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Julie Ellwood, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Iryna Rund, Loïc Treffel, Jerry Draper-Rodi
{"title":"预防婴儿不对称的指导策略:系统综述。","authors":"Julie Ellwood, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Iryna Rund, Loïc Treffel, Jerry Draper-Rodi","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05670-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile asymmetries of posture, movement and/or shape are common. Coincidence in the presentation of asymmetrical features can lead to a broad spectrum of descriptors. Published guidelines on prevention strategies are not currently available. The objective of this systematic review was to find, evaluate, and synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of prevention strategies for infantile asymmetries, specifically strategies involving paediatric screening and/or guidance to parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review has been reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework, ( https://osf.io/rgzev/ ). Searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED, and PEDro. Inclusion criteria of articles were infants < 28 weeks old who had received either an early musculoskeletal screen and/or education to parents on home care guidance/exercises to prevent asymmetry development. Any primary research was included. There was no limit placed upon date of publication. Data were screened, extracted and appraised in duplicate by at least two blinded reviewers. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias available as part of Covidence was used by two reviewers independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 878 papers retrieved, 19 studies were included: 9 randomised controlled trials, 6 cohort studies and 4 non-randomised experimental studies. The presenting conditions included head shape asymmetry in 16/19 studies, cervical range of motion in 10 studies and positional preference in 3. Due to a lack of homogeneity between all the studies, it was not possible to pool the data and conduct meta-analysis. Guidance strategies show better outcomes in asymmetry prevention when provided early (< 3 months) and under supervision of a healthcare professional. The overall risk of bias for cohort and non-randomised experimental studies was considered to be 'low', and 'adequate' or 'low' for randomised controlled trials. The GRADE level of evidence was found to be 'very low'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early parental guidance may prevent infantile asymmetry when supervised by a trained healthcare professional and with good adherence from parents. Further studies with a higher methodological rigour are needed to identify and perform comparative interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable. OSF NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGZEV .</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidance strategies for infantile asymmetry prevention: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Ellwood, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Iryna Rund, Loïc Treffel, Jerry Draper-Rodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-025-05670-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile asymmetries of posture, movement and/or shape are common. Coincidence in the presentation of asymmetrical features can lead to a broad spectrum of descriptors. Published guidelines on prevention strategies are not currently available. The objective of this systematic review was to find, evaluate, and synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of prevention strategies for infantile asymmetries, specifically strategies involving paediatric screening and/or guidance to parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review has been reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework, ( https://osf.io/rgzev/ ). Searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED, and PEDro. Inclusion criteria of articles were infants < 28 weeks old who had received either an early musculoskeletal screen and/or education to parents on home care guidance/exercises to prevent asymmetry development. Any primary research was included. There was no limit placed upon date of publication. Data were screened, extracted and appraised in duplicate by at least two blinded reviewers. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias available as part of Covidence was used by two reviewers independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 878 papers retrieved, 19 studies were included: 9 randomised controlled trials, 6 cohort studies and 4 non-randomised experimental studies. The presenting conditions included head shape asymmetry in 16/19 studies, cervical range of motion in 10 studies and positional preference in 3. Due to a lack of homogeneity between all the studies, it was not possible to pool the data and conduct meta-analysis. Guidance strategies show better outcomes in asymmetry prevention when provided early (< 3 months) and under supervision of a healthcare professional. The overall risk of bias for cohort and non-randomised experimental studies was considered to be 'low', and 'adequate' or 'low' for randomised controlled trials. The GRADE level of evidence was found to be 'very low'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early parental guidance may prevent infantile asymmetry when supervised by a trained healthcare professional and with good adherence from parents. Further studies with a higher methodological rigour are needed to identify and perform comparative interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable. OSF NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGZEV .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05670-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05670-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:婴儿的姿势、动作和/或形状不对称是常见的。呈现不对称特征时的巧合可以导致描述符的广谱。目前还没有出版的预防战略指南。本系统综述的目的是寻找、评估和综合有关婴儿不对称预防策略有效性的现有证据,特别是涉及儿科筛查和/或对父母指导的策略。方法:本综述基于系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行报道,该综述方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/rgzev/)上前瞻性注册。在Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED和PEDro上进行了搜索。结果:在检索到的878篇论文中,纳入了19项研究:9项随机对照试验,6项队列研究和4项非随机实验研究。在16/19项研究中,患者表现为头部形状不对称,10项研究中出现颈椎活动范围,3项研究中出现体位偏好。由于所有研究之间缺乏同质性,因此无法汇集数据并进行meta分析。早期提供的指导策略在预防不对称方面显示出更好的结果(结论:在训练有素的医疗保健专业人员的监督下,父母的良好依从性可以预防婴儿不对称。需要采用更严格的方法进行进一步研究,以确定和执行比较干预措施。临床试验号:不适用。OSF编号:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGZEV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidance strategies for infantile asymmetry prevention: a systematic review.

Background: Infantile asymmetries of posture, movement and/or shape are common. Coincidence in the presentation of asymmetrical features can lead to a broad spectrum of descriptors. Published guidelines on prevention strategies are not currently available. The objective of this systematic review was to find, evaluate, and synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of prevention strategies for infantile asymmetries, specifically strategies involving paediatric screening and/or guidance to parents.

Methods: This review has been reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework, ( https://osf.io/rgzev/ ). Searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED, and PEDro. Inclusion criteria of articles were infants < 28 weeks old who had received either an early musculoskeletal screen and/or education to parents on home care guidance/exercises to prevent asymmetry development. Any primary research was included. There was no limit placed upon date of publication. Data were screened, extracted and appraised in duplicate by at least two blinded reviewers. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias available as part of Covidence was used by two reviewers independently.

Results: Of the 878 papers retrieved, 19 studies were included: 9 randomised controlled trials, 6 cohort studies and 4 non-randomised experimental studies. The presenting conditions included head shape asymmetry in 16/19 studies, cervical range of motion in 10 studies and positional preference in 3. Due to a lack of homogeneity between all the studies, it was not possible to pool the data and conduct meta-analysis. Guidance strategies show better outcomes in asymmetry prevention when provided early (< 3 months) and under supervision of a healthcare professional. The overall risk of bias for cohort and non-randomised experimental studies was considered to be 'low', and 'adequate' or 'low' for randomised controlled trials. The GRADE level of evidence was found to be 'very low'.

Conclusion: Early parental guidance may prevent infantile asymmetry when supervised by a trained healthcare professional and with good adherence from parents. Further studies with a higher methodological rigour are needed to identify and perform comparative interventions.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable. OSF NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGZEV .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信