基于Angiosperms353探针组的Boraginales系统发育的更新:形态进化的路线图。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Maria-Anna Vasile, Tim Böhnert, Julius Jeiter, Domingos Cardoso, Peter W Moonlight, Maximilian Weigend
{"title":"基于Angiosperms353探针组的Boraginales系统发育的更新:形态进化的路线图。","authors":"Maria-Anna Vasile, Tim Böhnert, Julius Jeiter, Domingos Cardoso, Peter W Moonlight, Maximilian Weigend","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Boraginales, a subcosmopolitan order with ~2,700 species in currently 11 families, has seen fluctuating classification at the family and generic levels. Gynoecium and fruit morphology have been pivotal in morphological classifications, but a systematic evaluation based on anatomical and ontogenetic data has not been attempted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We revisited the phylogenetic relationships in Boraginales by analysing 162 newly sequenced samples using the Angiosperms353 probe set, together with existing data from 88 samples. Our sampling covers >80% of the genera and all currently and previously recognized families. A morphological assessment of taxonomically important gynoecial and fruit characters was done to guide our proposed family-level classification.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The phylogenies are largely consistent with previous phylogenetic studies, with better resolution overall and support from both data sets (exons, supercontigs) and all analyses implemented (coalescence, ASTRAL-Pro3, concatenation). The placement of Hydrophyllaceae as nested within Namaceae is a novel result, while the placement of the parasitic Lennoaceae as nested within Ehretiaceae is confirmed with maximum confidence. The placement of Codonaceae remains ambiguous: retrieved within the Boraginales I, as sister to the clade comprising Wellstediaceae and Boraginaceae based on exons, and as sister branch to all remaining Boraginales II based on supercontigs. We propose the recognition of a total of nine families in Boraginales. Tribal relationships in Boraginaceae subfam. Cynoglossoideae are fully resolved for the first time. Our data show that shifts in placentation and ovule number are instrumental for the arisal of complex internal ovary architectures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight the effectiveness of the Angiosperms353 probe set for understanding the evolutionary history of Boraginales and pave the way for resolving remaining unresolved nodes and taxonomic issues. Complex modifications of bicarpellate ovaries led to an extreme and lineage-specific diversification of fruits that likely played a crucial role in Boraginales macroevolution. Combining this highly resolved phylogeny with future critical morphological analyses promises a deep understanding of evolutionary trajectories in Boraginales.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An updated phylogeny of Boraginales based on the Angiosperms353 probe set: a roadmap for understanding morphological evolution.\",\"authors\":\"Maria-Anna Vasile, Tim Böhnert, Julius Jeiter, Domingos Cardoso, Peter W Moonlight, Maximilian Weigend\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aob/mcaf061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Boraginales, a subcosmopolitan order with ~2,700 species in currently 11 families, has seen fluctuating classification at the family and generic levels. Gynoecium and fruit morphology have been pivotal in morphological classifications, but a systematic evaluation based on anatomical and ontogenetic data has not been attempted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We revisited the phylogenetic relationships in Boraginales by analysing 162 newly sequenced samples using the Angiosperms353 probe set, together with existing data from 88 samples. Our sampling covers >80% of the genera and all currently and previously recognized families. A morphological assessment of taxonomically important gynoecial and fruit characters was done to guide our proposed family-level classification.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The phylogenies are largely consistent with previous phylogenetic studies, with better resolution overall and support from both data sets (exons, supercontigs) and all analyses implemented (coalescence, ASTRAL-Pro3, concatenation). The placement of Hydrophyllaceae as nested within Namaceae is a novel result, while the placement of the parasitic Lennoaceae as nested within Ehretiaceae is confirmed with maximum confidence. The placement of Codonaceae remains ambiguous: retrieved within the Boraginales I, as sister to the clade comprising Wellstediaceae and Boraginaceae based on exons, and as sister branch to all remaining Boraginales II based on supercontigs. We propose the recognition of a total of nine families in Boraginales. Tribal relationships in Boraginaceae subfam. Cynoglossoideae are fully resolved for the first time. Our data show that shifts in placentation and ovule number are instrumental for the arisal of complex internal ovary architectures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight the effectiveness of the Angiosperms353 probe set for understanding the evolutionary history of Boraginales and pave the way for resolving remaining unresolved nodes and taxonomic issues. Complex modifications of bicarpellate ovaries led to an extreme and lineage-specific diversification of fruits that likely played a crucial role in Boraginales macroevolution. Combining this highly resolved phylogeny with future critical morphological analyses promises a deep understanding of evolutionary trajectories in Boraginales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:羊尾目是亚世界性目,隶属于11科约2700种,在科和属水平上的分类一直不稳定。雌蕊和果实形态一直是形态学分类的关键,但基于解剖和个体发生数据的系统评价尚未尝试。方法:利用Angiosperms353探针对162个新测序样本进行分析,并结合88个样本的现有数据,重新分析了Boraginales的系统发育关系。我们的样本涵盖了80%的属和所有目前和以前认可的科。对重要的雌蕊和果实性状进行了形态学评价,以指导我们提出的科级分类。主要结果:系统发育与以前的系统发育研究基本一致,总体分辨率更高,并且得到了数据集(外显子、超contigs)和所有分析(coalescence、ASTRAL-Pro3、concatation)的支持。水螅科嵌套在楠科中是一个新颖的结果,而寄生的Lennoaceae嵌套在Ehretiaceae中则得到了极大的肯定。Codonaceae的位置仍然模棱两可:根据外显子,作为由Wellstediaceae和Boraginaceae组成的分支的姐妹,根据超contigs,作为所有剩余的Boraginales II的姐妹分支,在Boraginales I中检索。我们建议承认博拉基纳莱斯共有9个家族。菖蒲科植物的部落关系。犬牙纲第一次被完全分解。我们的数据表明,胎盘和胚珠数的变化对复杂的内部子房结构的出现是有帮助的。结论:这一结果突出了Angiosperms353探针对了解Boraginales进化历史的有效性,并为解决尚未解决的节点和分类问题铺平了道路。二重皮子房的复杂修饰导致了果实的极端和谱系特异性多样化,这可能在博拉果属的宏观进化中起着至关重要的作用。将这种高度确定的系统发育与未来的关键形态分析相结合,有望深入了解波拉基纳目的进化轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An updated phylogeny of Boraginales based on the Angiosperms353 probe set: a roadmap for understanding morphological evolution.

Background and aims: Boraginales, a subcosmopolitan order with ~2,700 species in currently 11 families, has seen fluctuating classification at the family and generic levels. Gynoecium and fruit morphology have been pivotal in morphological classifications, but a systematic evaluation based on anatomical and ontogenetic data has not been attempted.

Methods: We revisited the phylogenetic relationships in Boraginales by analysing 162 newly sequenced samples using the Angiosperms353 probe set, together with existing data from 88 samples. Our sampling covers >80% of the genera and all currently and previously recognized families. A morphological assessment of taxonomically important gynoecial and fruit characters was done to guide our proposed family-level classification.

Key results: The phylogenies are largely consistent with previous phylogenetic studies, with better resolution overall and support from both data sets (exons, supercontigs) and all analyses implemented (coalescence, ASTRAL-Pro3, concatenation). The placement of Hydrophyllaceae as nested within Namaceae is a novel result, while the placement of the parasitic Lennoaceae as nested within Ehretiaceae is confirmed with maximum confidence. The placement of Codonaceae remains ambiguous: retrieved within the Boraginales I, as sister to the clade comprising Wellstediaceae and Boraginaceae based on exons, and as sister branch to all remaining Boraginales II based on supercontigs. We propose the recognition of a total of nine families in Boraginales. Tribal relationships in Boraginaceae subfam. Cynoglossoideae are fully resolved for the first time. Our data show that shifts in placentation and ovule number are instrumental for the arisal of complex internal ovary architectures.

Conclusions: The results highlight the effectiveness of the Angiosperms353 probe set for understanding the evolutionary history of Boraginales and pave the way for resolving remaining unresolved nodes and taxonomic issues. Complex modifications of bicarpellate ovaries led to an extreme and lineage-specific diversification of fruits that likely played a crucial role in Boraginales macroevolution. Combining this highly resolved phylogeny with future critical morphological analyses promises a deep understanding of evolutionary trajectories in Boraginales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信