用碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮器械评估转移性脊柱癌患者的长期结构稳定性。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gavril Rosoklija, Skanda Sai, Garrett Q Barr, Ahmed M Meleis
{"title":"用碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮器械评估转移性脊柱癌患者的长期结构稳定性。","authors":"Gavril Rosoklija, Skanda Sai, Garrett Q Barr, Ahmed M Meleis","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Metastatic spine disease significantly impacts the oncological population, often requiring surgical intervention to address spinal instability. Traditional constructs, including titanium-based long-segment instrumentation and short-segment cement augmentation, have been the mainstay in managing these patients. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) hardware and shorter-segment instrumentation have demonstrated benefits of improved surveillance, earlier recurrence detection, and shorter operative time. This study evaluated the long-term experience of a single center with CFR-PEEK constructs in patients with metastatic spine disease. It also investigated the clinical durability of short-segment constructs and evaluated the necessity of cement augmentation in maintaining construct stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients with metastatic disease to the spine who underwent surgical fixation using CFR-PEEK hardware between 2021 and 2024. Inclusion criteria required perioperative radiation therapy and a minimum of 6 months of radiographic follow-up. Patients were stratified into short-construct (n = 13) and long-construct (n = 7) groups based on the number of vertebral levels spanned. Subgroup analysis of cement-augmented versus nonaugmented short constructs was performed. Variables analyzed included preoperative scores (American Spinal Injury Association grade, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, and epidural spinal cord compression grade), estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative outcomes. Radiographic failure and revision surgery rates were primary endpoints. Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 14 months of mean follow-up time, no radiographic failures or revision surgeries were observed within the 20 patients included in this study. Patients in the long-construct group had more vertebral levels involved (2.00 vs 1.15, p = 0.024), lower preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores (58.57 vs 76.15, p = 0.01), and more frequent use of mixed constructs with titanium rods (p = 0.007). Short constructs demonstrated equivalent durability without the routine need for cement augmentation. Within the short-construct cohort, cement augmentation was associated with longer hospital stays (8.8 vs 3.63 days, p = 0.008) but did not reduce failure rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFR-PEEK instrumentation demonstrates excellent durability and stability in metastatic spine disease, even in patients receiving perioperative radiation therapy. Short-segment instrumentation demonstrates comparable durability to long-segment constructs while reducing operative risks and hospitalization duration. While cement augmentation has traditionally been used to enhance construct strength, the findings in this study suggest that its routine use may not be necessary in short-segment constructs; however, larger studies are needed to better understand long-term outcomes, optimize construct selection, and identify factors influencing hardware failure in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 5","pages":"E11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating long-term construct stability in metastatic spine cancer patients with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone instrumentation.\",\"authors\":\"Gavril Rosoklija, Skanda Sai, Garrett Q Barr, Ahmed M Meleis\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Metastatic spine disease significantly impacts the oncological population, often requiring surgical intervention to address spinal instability. Traditional constructs, including titanium-based long-segment instrumentation and short-segment cement augmentation, have been the mainstay in managing these patients. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) hardware and shorter-segment instrumentation have demonstrated benefits of improved surveillance, earlier recurrence detection, and shorter operative time. This study evaluated the long-term experience of a single center with CFR-PEEK constructs in patients with metastatic spine disease. It also investigated the clinical durability of short-segment constructs and evaluated the necessity of cement augmentation in maintaining construct stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients with metastatic disease to the spine who underwent surgical fixation using CFR-PEEK hardware between 2021 and 2024. Inclusion criteria required perioperative radiation therapy and a minimum of 6 months of radiographic follow-up. Patients were stratified into short-construct (n = 13) and long-construct (n = 7) groups based on the number of vertebral levels spanned. Subgroup analysis of cement-augmented versus nonaugmented short constructs was performed. Variables analyzed included preoperative scores (American Spinal Injury Association grade, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, and epidural spinal cord compression grade), estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative outcomes. Radiographic failure and revision surgery rates were primary endpoints. Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 14 months of mean follow-up time, no radiographic failures or revision surgeries were observed within the 20 patients included in this study. Patients in the long-construct group had more vertebral levels involved (2.00 vs 1.15, p = 0.024), lower preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores (58.57 vs 76.15, p = 0.01), and more frequent use of mixed constructs with titanium rods (p = 0.007). Short constructs demonstrated equivalent durability without the routine need for cement augmentation. Within the short-construct cohort, cement augmentation was associated with longer hospital stays (8.8 vs 3.63 days, p = 0.008) but did not reduce failure rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFR-PEEK instrumentation demonstrates excellent durability and stability in metastatic spine disease, even in patients receiving perioperative radiation therapy. Short-segment instrumentation demonstrates comparable durability to long-segment constructs while reducing operative risks and hospitalization duration. While cement augmentation has traditionally been used to enhance construct strength, the findings in this study suggest that its routine use may not be necessary in short-segment constructs; however, larger studies are needed to better understand long-term outcomes, optimize construct selection, and identify factors influencing hardware failure in this high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"E11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24995\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:转移性脊柱疾病显著影响肿瘤人群,通常需要手术干预来解决脊柱不稳定。传统的结构,包括钛基长节段器械和短节段骨水泥增强,一直是治疗这些患者的主要方法。碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(CFR-PEEK)硬件和短节段仪器已被证明具有改善监测、早期复发检测和缩短手术时间的优点。本研究评估了转移性脊柱疾病患者单中心CFR-PEEK结构的长期经验。它还研究了短节段假体的临床耐久性,并评估了水泥增强在维持假体稳定性方面的必要性。方法:这项回顾性的单中心研究纳入了2021年至2024年间使用CFR-PEEK硬体进行手术固定的脊柱转移性疾病患者。纳入标准要求围手术期放疗和至少6个月的影像学随访。根据跨越的椎体节段数量,将患者分为短节段组(n = 13)和长节段组(n = 7)。进行骨水泥增强与非增强短构体的亚组分析。分析的变量包括术前评分(美国脊髓损伤协会评分、Karnofsky评分、脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分和硬膜外脊髓压迫评分)、估计失血量、住院时间和术后结果。影像学失败和翻修手术率是主要终点。采用非参数方法进行统计分析。结果:在14个月的平均随访时间中,本研究纳入的20例患者中没有观察到影像学失败或翻修手术。长结构组的患者有更多的椎体水平受损伤(2.00 vs 1.15, p = 0.024),术前Karnofsky性能量表评分较低(58.57 vs 76.15, p = 0.01),并且更频繁地使用钛棒混合结构(p = 0.007)。短结构在无需常规水泥加固的情况下具有相同的耐久性。在短期构建队列中,水泥增强术与更长的住院时间相关(8.8天vs 3.63天,p = 0.008),但并没有降低失败率。结论:CFR-PEEK仪器在转移性脊柱疾病中表现出优异的耐久性和稳定性,即使在接受围手术期放射治疗的患者中也是如此。短节段内固定与长节段内固定具有相当的耐用性,同时减少了手术风险和住院时间。虽然传统上使用水泥增强来增强结构强度,但本研究的结果表明,在短段结构中可能没有必要常规使用水泥增强;然而,需要更大规模的研究来更好地了解长期结果,优化结构选择,并确定影响高危人群硬件故障的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating long-term construct stability in metastatic spine cancer patients with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone instrumentation.

Objective: Metastatic spine disease significantly impacts the oncological population, often requiring surgical intervention to address spinal instability. Traditional constructs, including titanium-based long-segment instrumentation and short-segment cement augmentation, have been the mainstay in managing these patients. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) hardware and shorter-segment instrumentation have demonstrated benefits of improved surveillance, earlier recurrence detection, and shorter operative time. This study evaluated the long-term experience of a single center with CFR-PEEK constructs in patients with metastatic spine disease. It also investigated the clinical durability of short-segment constructs and evaluated the necessity of cement augmentation in maintaining construct stability.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with metastatic disease to the spine who underwent surgical fixation using CFR-PEEK hardware between 2021 and 2024. Inclusion criteria required perioperative radiation therapy and a minimum of 6 months of radiographic follow-up. Patients were stratified into short-construct (n = 13) and long-construct (n = 7) groups based on the number of vertebral levels spanned. Subgroup analysis of cement-augmented versus nonaugmented short constructs was performed. Variables analyzed included preoperative scores (American Spinal Injury Association grade, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, and epidural spinal cord compression grade), estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative outcomes. Radiographic failure and revision surgery rates were primary endpoints. Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric methods.

Results: At 14 months of mean follow-up time, no radiographic failures or revision surgeries were observed within the 20 patients included in this study. Patients in the long-construct group had more vertebral levels involved (2.00 vs 1.15, p = 0.024), lower preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale scores (58.57 vs 76.15, p = 0.01), and more frequent use of mixed constructs with titanium rods (p = 0.007). Short constructs demonstrated equivalent durability without the routine need for cement augmentation. Within the short-construct cohort, cement augmentation was associated with longer hospital stays (8.8 vs 3.63 days, p = 0.008) but did not reduce failure rates.

Conclusions: CFR-PEEK instrumentation demonstrates excellent durability and stability in metastatic spine disease, even in patients receiving perioperative radiation therapy. Short-segment instrumentation demonstrates comparable durability to long-segment constructs while reducing operative risks and hospitalization duration. While cement augmentation has traditionally been used to enhance construct strength, the findings in this study suggest that its routine use may not be necessary in short-segment constructs; however, larger studies are needed to better understand long-term outcomes, optimize construct selection, and identify factors influencing hardware failure in this high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信