子宫内膜异位症患者的术前期望-一项定性访谈研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nina Hirsing, Yvonne Nestoriuc, Olaf Buchweitz, Ann-Katrin Meyrose
{"title":"子宫内膜异位症患者的术前期望-一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Nina Hirsing, Yvonne Nestoriuc, Olaf Buchweitz, Ann-Katrin Meyrose","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03686-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expectations determine treatment outcomes in several medical conditions. The significance of expectations for treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis remains unknown. Endometriosis is a painful and debilitating disease that negatively affects quality of life. Up to 30% of surgically treated patients report persistent post-operative complaints and pain disability without sufficient medical explanation, indicating the impact of non-medical factors on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present qualitative study aimed to describe and understand pre-operative patient expectations, facilitators of and barriers to positive treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As part of a large mixed-method cohort study, a subsample of N = 33 patients with endometriosis were interviewed before laparoscopy. Structured content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive expectations included significant improvement or absence of complaints, receiving a diagnosis, and subsequently improved health-related quality of life. However, patients also reported negative expectations such as invalidation of their experience, persistence of complaints, or post-operative side effects. Patients perceived positive expectations as facilitators for positive treatment outcomes. Further facilitators included enhanced patient and treatment information, gynaecologists specialized in endometriosis, and greater awareness of endometriosis. Perceived barriers to good post-operative quality of life included post-operative pain and scarring, insufficient rest, avoidance behaviour, and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive and negative expectations coexisted. Positive expectations suggest that participants place much hope in laparoscopy. However, these positive expectations may exceed probable treatment outcomes for some patients. Negative expectations were also expressed and constituted a risk for nocebo effects. Further identified facilitators and barriers show that patients are very clear about what is helpful or not for their health-related quality of life after laparoscopy. Patient and treatment information may be enhanced to prevent unrealistic treatment expectations and nocebo effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-operative expectations in patients with endometriosis - a qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Hirsing, Yvonne Nestoriuc, Olaf Buchweitz, Ann-Katrin Meyrose\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03686-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expectations determine treatment outcomes in several medical conditions. The significance of expectations for treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis remains unknown. Endometriosis is a painful and debilitating disease that negatively affects quality of life. Up to 30% of surgically treated patients report persistent post-operative complaints and pain disability without sufficient medical explanation, indicating the impact of non-medical factors on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present qualitative study aimed to describe and understand pre-operative patient expectations, facilitators of and barriers to positive treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As part of a large mixed-method cohort study, a subsample of N = 33 patients with endometriosis were interviewed before laparoscopy. Structured content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive expectations included significant improvement or absence of complaints, receiving a diagnosis, and subsequently improved health-related quality of life. However, patients also reported negative expectations such as invalidation of their experience, persistence of complaints, or post-operative side effects. Patients perceived positive expectations as facilitators for positive treatment outcomes. Further facilitators included enhanced patient and treatment information, gynaecologists specialized in endometriosis, and greater awareness of endometriosis. Perceived barriers to good post-operative quality of life included post-operative pain and scarring, insufficient rest, avoidance behaviour, and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive and negative expectations coexisted. Positive expectations suggest that participants place much hope in laparoscopy. However, these positive expectations may exceed probable treatment outcomes for some patients. Negative expectations were also expressed and constituted a risk for nocebo effects. Further identified facilitators and barriers show that patients are very clear about what is helpful or not for their health-related quality of life after laparoscopy. Patient and treatment information may be enhanced to prevent unrealistic treatment expectations and nocebo effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03686-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03686-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:期望决定了几种医疗条件下的治疗结果。对子宫内膜异位症患者治疗结果预期的意义尚不清楚。子宫内膜异位症是一种痛苦和衰弱的疾病,对生活质量产生负面影响。高达30%的手术治疗患者报告持续的术后抱怨和疼痛残疾,没有足够的医学解释,表明非医学因素对治疗结果的影响。目的:本定性研究旨在描述和了解术前患者的期望,积极治疗结果的促进因素和障碍。方法:作为一项大型混合方法队列研究的一部分,在腹腔镜检查前对N = 33例子宫内膜异位症患者进行了访谈。进行结构化内容分析。结果:积极的期望包括显著改善或没有抱怨,接受诊断,随后改善与健康相关的生活质量。然而,患者也报告了负面的期望,如他们的经验无效,持续的抱怨,或术后副作用。患者认为积极的期望是积极治疗结果的促进因素。进一步的促进因素包括增强患者和治疗信息,子宫内膜异位症妇科专家,以及提高对子宫内膜异位症的认识。术后良好生活质量的障碍包括术后疼痛和疤痕、休息不足、回避行为和压力。结论:积极期望与消极期望并存。积极的期望表明参与者对腹腔镜手术抱有很大的希望。然而,对一些患者来说,这些积极的期望可能超过了可能的治疗结果。负面预期也被表达出来,并构成反安慰剂效应的风险。进一步确定的促进因素和障碍表明,患者非常清楚腹腔镜手术后对他们的健康相关生活质量有帮助或没有帮助。可以加强患者和治疗信息,以防止不切实际的治疗期望和反安慰剂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-operative expectations in patients with endometriosis - a qualitative interview study.

Background: Expectations determine treatment outcomes in several medical conditions. The significance of expectations for treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis remains unknown. Endometriosis is a painful and debilitating disease that negatively affects quality of life. Up to 30% of surgically treated patients report persistent post-operative complaints and pain disability without sufficient medical explanation, indicating the impact of non-medical factors on treatment outcomes.

Aim: The present qualitative study aimed to describe and understand pre-operative patient expectations, facilitators of and barriers to positive treatment outcomes.

Method: As part of a large mixed-method cohort study, a subsample of N = 33 patients with endometriosis were interviewed before laparoscopy. Structured content analysis was performed.

Results: Positive expectations included significant improvement or absence of complaints, receiving a diagnosis, and subsequently improved health-related quality of life. However, patients also reported negative expectations such as invalidation of their experience, persistence of complaints, or post-operative side effects. Patients perceived positive expectations as facilitators for positive treatment outcomes. Further facilitators included enhanced patient and treatment information, gynaecologists specialized in endometriosis, and greater awareness of endometriosis. Perceived barriers to good post-operative quality of life included post-operative pain and scarring, insufficient rest, avoidance behaviour, and stress.

Conclusion: Positive and negative expectations coexisted. Positive expectations suggest that participants place much hope in laparoscopy. However, these positive expectations may exceed probable treatment outcomes for some patients. Negative expectations were also expressed and constituted a risk for nocebo effects. Further identified facilitators and barriers show that patients are very clear about what is helpful or not for their health-related quality of life after laparoscopy. Patient and treatment information may be enhanced to prevent unrealistic treatment expectations and nocebo effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信