开发一个社区水平的老年友好型社区指标:日本老年学评价研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Satoko Fujihara, Taiji Noguchi, Kazushige Ide, Seungwon Jeong, Katsunori Kondo, Toshiyuki Ojima
{"title":"开发一个社区水平的老年友好型社区指标:日本老年学评价研究。","authors":"Satoko Fujihara, Taiji Noguchi, Kazushige Ide, Seungwon Jeong, Katsunori Kondo, Toshiyuki Ojima","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05919-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-friendly communities (AFCs) aim to create inclusive societies for older adults. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights dementia considerations in AFC development; however, few community-level indicators include these elements. This study aimed to develop a community-level AFC indicator incorporating dementia-friendly elements based on WHO guidelines and to test its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional design used data from the 2016 and 2019 waves of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) covering 61 school districts in 16 municipalities (45,162 individuals aged 65 and older in 2016 and 39,313 in 2019). The 2016 and 2019 datasets served as the development and retest samples, respectively. The item selection process involved extracting indicators from the JAGES survey items that aligned with WHO guidelines as well as those based on prior research on dementia-friendly communities (DFCs). Following expert consultations, 23 candidate items were identified. Data were aggregated at the school district level. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the 2016 data to derive the factor structure, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess model fit. The reproducibility of the factor structure was evaluated using EFA on the 2019 retest sample. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final 17-item indicator comprised three subscales: Social inclusion and dementia-friendliness (7 items, α = 0.86; e.g., Sense of belonging to the community), Social engagement and communication (5 items, α = 0.78; e.g., Participation in hobby groups), and Age-friendly physical environment (5 items, α = 0.82; e.g., Accessibility of barrier-free streets). The CFA showed an unsatisfactory model fit; however, test-retest reliability was adequate (r = 0.71-0.79; ICC = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A valid and reliable 17-item community-level indicator was developed, aligning with the WHO framework and incorporating dementia-friendly elements. This indicator is a valuable tool for monitoring, evaluation, and inter-community comparisons, aiding the development of AFCs and DFCs in aging societies like Japan. Additionally, this indicator can be adapted for other high-income countries with similar socioeconomic backgrounds, healthcare systems, and community structures, providing a useful tool for age- and dementia-friendly initiatives.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an indicator for community-level age-friendly communities: the Japan gerontological evaluation study.\",\"authors\":\"Satoko Fujihara, Taiji Noguchi, Kazushige Ide, Seungwon Jeong, Katsunori Kondo, Toshiyuki Ojima\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-05919-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-friendly communities (AFCs) aim to create inclusive societies for older adults. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights dementia considerations in AFC development; however, few community-level indicators include these elements. This study aimed to develop a community-level AFC indicator incorporating dementia-friendly elements based on WHO guidelines and to test its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional design used data from the 2016 and 2019 waves of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) covering 61 school districts in 16 municipalities (45,162 individuals aged 65 and older in 2016 and 39,313 in 2019). The 2016 and 2019 datasets served as the development and retest samples, respectively. The item selection process involved extracting indicators from the JAGES survey items that aligned with WHO guidelines as well as those based on prior research on dementia-friendly communities (DFCs). Following expert consultations, 23 candidate items were identified. Data were aggregated at the school district level. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the 2016 data to derive the factor structure, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess model fit. The reproducibility of the factor structure was evaluated using EFA on the 2019 retest sample. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final 17-item indicator comprised three subscales: Social inclusion and dementia-friendliness (7 items, α = 0.86; e.g., Sense of belonging to the community), Social engagement and communication (5 items, α = 0.78; e.g., Participation in hobby groups), and Age-friendly physical environment (5 items, α = 0.82; e.g., Accessibility of barrier-free streets). The CFA showed an unsatisfactory model fit; however, test-retest reliability was adequate (r = 0.71-0.79; ICC = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A valid and reliable 17-item community-level indicator was developed, aligning with the WHO framework and incorporating dementia-friendly elements. This indicator is a valuable tool for monitoring, evaluation, and inter-community comparisons, aiding the development of AFCs and DFCs in aging societies like Japan. Additionally, this indicator can be adapted for other high-income countries with similar socioeconomic backgrounds, healthcare systems, and community structures, providing a useful tool for age- and dementia-friendly initiatives.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05919-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05919-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年友好社区(AFCs)旨在为老年人创建包容性社会。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)强调在亚足联发展中对痴呆症的考虑;然而,很少有社区一级的指标包括这些要素。本研究旨在根据世卫组织指南制定一项社区层面的AFC指标,纳入对痴呆症友好的要素,并检验其效度和可靠性。方法:采用重复横断面设计,使用2016年和2019年日本老年学评估研究(JAGES)的数据,涵盖16个直辖市的61个学区(2016年为45162名65岁及以上的个体,2019年为39313名)。2016年和2019年的数据集分别作为开发和重新测试的样本。项目选择过程包括从JAGES调查项目中提取符合世卫组织指南的指标,以及基于对痴呆症友好社区(dfc)的先前研究的指标。经过专家协商,确定了23个候选项目。数据是在学区一级汇总的。对2016年的数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA)推导因子结构,并采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估模型拟合。利用EFA对2019年复测样品进行因子结构的再现性评价。评估内部一致性和重测信度。结果:最终的17项指标包括三个子量表:社会包容和痴呆症友好性(7项,α = 0.86;例如,社区归属感)、社会参与和沟通(5项,α = 0.78;例如,参加兴趣小组)和年龄友好型物理环境(5项,α = 0.82;例如,无障碍街道的可达性)。CFA模型拟合不理想;然而,重测信度是足够的(r = 0.71-0.79;icc = 0.67-0.78)。结论:制定了一个有效和可靠的17项社区一级指标,与世卫组织框架保持一致,并纳入了对痴呆症友好的要素。该指标是监测、评估和社区间比较的宝贵工具,有助于日本等老龄化社会发展AFCs和dfc。此外,该指标可适用于具有类似社会经济背景、卫生保健系统和社区结构的其他高收入国家,为老年人和痴呆症友好型举措提供有用的工具。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing an indicator for community-level age-friendly communities: the Japan gerontological evaluation study.

Background: Age-friendly communities (AFCs) aim to create inclusive societies for older adults. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights dementia considerations in AFC development; however, few community-level indicators include these elements. This study aimed to develop a community-level AFC indicator incorporating dementia-friendly elements based on WHO guidelines and to test its validity and reliability.

Methods: A repeated cross-sectional design used data from the 2016 and 2019 waves of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) covering 61 school districts in 16 municipalities (45,162 individuals aged 65 and older in 2016 and 39,313 in 2019). The 2016 and 2019 datasets served as the development and retest samples, respectively. The item selection process involved extracting indicators from the JAGES survey items that aligned with WHO guidelines as well as those based on prior research on dementia-friendly communities (DFCs). Following expert consultations, 23 candidate items were identified. Data were aggregated at the school district level. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the 2016 data to derive the factor structure, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess model fit. The reproducibility of the factor structure was evaluated using EFA on the 2019 retest sample. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed.

Results: The final 17-item indicator comprised three subscales: Social inclusion and dementia-friendliness (7 items, α = 0.86; e.g., Sense of belonging to the community), Social engagement and communication (5 items, α = 0.78; e.g., Participation in hobby groups), and Age-friendly physical environment (5 items, α = 0.82; e.g., Accessibility of barrier-free streets). The CFA showed an unsatisfactory model fit; however, test-retest reliability was adequate (r = 0.71-0.79; ICC = 0.67-0.78).

Conclusions: A valid and reliable 17-item community-level indicator was developed, aligning with the WHO framework and incorporating dementia-friendly elements. This indicator is a valuable tool for monitoring, evaluation, and inter-community comparisons, aiding the development of AFCs and DFCs in aging societies like Japan. Additionally, this indicator can be adapted for other high-income countries with similar socioeconomic backgrounds, healthcare systems, and community structures, providing a useful tool for age- and dementia-friendly initiatives.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信