家庭无创正压通气联合肺康复对严重稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并慢性II型呼吸衰竭患者呼吸困难严重程度和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Shu Xie, Xiaoping Li, Yanfeng Liu, Jian Huang, Fangying Yang
{"title":"家庭无创正压通气联合肺康复对严重稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并慢性II型呼吸衰竭患者呼吸困难严重程度和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Shu Xie, Xiaoping Li, Yanfeng Liu, Jian Huang, Fangying Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03656-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and pulmonary rehabilitation have both shown promise in improving symptoms and lung function in COPD patients. However, the combined effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and NPPV on moderate to severe COPD patients remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPRNG group) compared to conventional treatment (CTG group) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 269 patients with moderate to severe COPD were enrolled, with 137 patients in the CTG group and 132 in the CPRNG group. The primary outcome measures included the COPD assessment test (CAT) score, modified medical research council scale (mMRC) score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) percentage, 6-min walk test, and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO₂). Secondary outcomes included various dimensions of quality of life (impact, symptoms, and activity) measured through patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline comparisons between groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, disease duration, or symptoms. The CPRNG group showed significant improvements compared to the CTG group in the CAT score (p = 0.028), mMRC score (p = 0.015), FEV1% (p = 0.008), 6-min walk test (p = 0.001), and PaO₂ (p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements in impact, symptoms, activity, and overall scores were significantly better in the CPRNG group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation significantly improves multiple dimensions of quality of life, particularly in controlling symptoms and enhancing daily activities in COPD patients. This combined therapy proves to be an effective treatment strategy, offering notable benefits in lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The clinical trial was registered retrospectively on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2500096605) on 2025-01-26, as required by The Fourth Hospital of Institutional (Changsha Fourth Hospital, Hunan Province, China) Review Board guidelines. Ethics approval date: January 2023 to December 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation combined with pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea severity and quality of life in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with chronic type II respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shu Xie, Xiaoping Li, Yanfeng Liu, Jian Huang, Fangying Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03656-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and pulmonary rehabilitation have both shown promise in improving symptoms and lung function in COPD patients. However, the combined effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and NPPV on moderate to severe COPD patients remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPRNG group) compared to conventional treatment (CTG group) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 269 patients with moderate to severe COPD were enrolled, with 137 patients in the CTG group and 132 in the CPRNG group. The primary outcome measures included the COPD assessment test (CAT) score, modified medical research council scale (mMRC) score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) percentage, 6-min walk test, and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO₂). Secondary outcomes included various dimensions of quality of life (impact, symptoms, and activity) measured through patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline comparisons between groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, disease duration, or symptoms. The CPRNG group showed significant improvements compared to the CTG group in the CAT score (p = 0.028), mMRC score (p = 0.015), FEV1% (p = 0.008), 6-min walk test (p = 0.001), and PaO₂ (p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements in impact, symptoms, activity, and overall scores were significantly better in the CPRNG group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation significantly improves multiple dimensions of quality of life, particularly in controlling symptoms and enhancing daily activities in COPD patients. This combined therapy proves to be an effective treatment strategy, offering notable benefits in lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The clinical trial was registered retrospectively on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2500096605) on 2025-01-26, as required by The Fourth Hospital of Institutional (Changsha Fourth Hospital, Hunan Province, China) Review Board guidelines. Ethics approval date: January 2023 to December 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03656-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03656-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种严重影响患者生活质量的进行性呼吸系统疾病。无创正压通气(NPPV)和肺康复都显示出改善COPD患者症状和肺功能的希望。然而,以家庭为基础的肺康复和NPPV对中重度COPD患者的联合效果尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评价家庭肺康复联合无创正压通气(CPRNG组)与常规治疗(CTG组)对中重度COPD患者的疗效。方法:共纳入269例中重度COPD患者,其中CTG组137例,CPRNG组132例。主要指标包括COPD评估测试(CAT)评分、改良医学研究委员会量表(mMRC)评分、一秒钟用力呼气量(FEV 1)百分比、6分钟步行测试和动脉氧压(PaO 2)。次要结局包括通过患者报告的结局测量的生活质量的各个维度(影响、症状和活动)。结果:两组之间的基线比较显示,在社会人口学特征、疾病持续时间或症状方面没有显著差异。与CTG组相比,CPRNG组在CAT评分(p = 0.028)、mMRC评分(p = 0.015)、FEV1% (p = 0.008)、6分钟步行测试(p = 0.001)和PaO₂(p)方面均有显著改善。结论:家庭肺康复联合无创正压通气可显著改善COPD患者多个维度的生活质量,特别是在控制症状和增强日常活动方面。这种联合治疗被证明是一种有效的治疗策略,在COPD患者的肺功能、运动能力和整体生活质量方面提供了显著的益处。试验注册:临床试验按照中国湖南省长沙市第四医院审查委员会指南的要求,于2025年01月26日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2500096605)回顾性注册。伦理审批日期:2023年1月至2025年12月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation combined with pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea severity and quality of life in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with chronic type II respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and pulmonary rehabilitation have both shown promise in improving symptoms and lung function in COPD patients. However, the combined effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and NPPV on moderate to severe COPD patients remain unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPRNG group) compared to conventional treatment (CTG group) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Methods: A total of 269 patients with moderate to severe COPD were enrolled, with 137 patients in the CTG group and 132 in the CPRNG group. The primary outcome measures included the COPD assessment test (CAT) score, modified medical research council scale (mMRC) score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) percentage, 6-min walk test, and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO₂). Secondary outcomes included various dimensions of quality of life (impact, symptoms, and activity) measured through patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Baseline comparisons between groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, disease duration, or symptoms. The CPRNG group showed significant improvements compared to the CTG group in the CAT score (p = 0.028), mMRC score (p = 0.015), FEV1% (p = 0.008), 6-min walk test (p = 0.001), and PaO₂ (p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements in impact, symptoms, activity, and overall scores were significantly better in the CPRNG group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation significantly improves multiple dimensions of quality of life, particularly in controlling symptoms and enhancing daily activities in COPD patients. This combined therapy proves to be an effective treatment strategy, offering notable benefits in lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life in COPD patients.

Trial registration: The clinical trial was registered retrospectively on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2500096605) on 2025-01-26, as required by The Fourth Hospital of Institutional (Changsha Fourth Hospital, Hunan Province, China) Review Board guidelines. Ethics approval date: January 2023 to December 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信