Michael C Y Tang, Lisa Klaassen, Marina Marinkovic, T H Khanh Vu, Gregorius P M Luyten, Carien L Creutzberg, Martijn Ketelaars, Jan-Willem M Beenakker
{"title":"Ru-106眼部涂抹器的MRI安全性评价。","authors":"Michael C Y Tang, Lisa Klaassen, Marina Marinkovic, T H Khanh Vu, Gregorius P M Luyten, Carien L Creutzberg, Martijn Ketelaars, Jan-Willem M Beenakker","doi":"10.1159/000542712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy is a primary treatment for uveal melanoma (UM), the most common intra-ocular malignancy in adults. This study evaluated the safety of Ru-106 applicators at 3 Tesla (T) MRI and their impact on image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic attraction and eddy currents were tested on a 20-mm-diameter Ru-106 applicator using a nylon string and a porcine eye. Safety criteria were defined by ocular oncologists, comparing magnetic field interactions to the forces exerted on the eye during surgery. Five UM patients were scanned at 3T MRI with the applicator in situ using both conventional anatomical sequences and scans optimised to reduce metal artefacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal magnetic interactions were observed. Eddy currents caused slight lagging during fast movements and temporary detachment of the applicator of the porcine eye in conditions that were considered unrealistic for clinical scans. Significant susceptibility artefacts compromised image quality of the affected eye.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Ru-106 applicators can be safely used in 3T MRI with some simple precautions. MR image quality of the eye was poor due to major susceptibility artefacts; however, imaging of extra-ocular anatomy is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":"11 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of MRI Safety of Ru-106 Eye Applicators.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Y Tang, Lisa Klaassen, Marina Marinkovic, T H Khanh Vu, Gregorius P M Luyten, Carien L Creutzberg, Martijn Ketelaars, Jan-Willem M Beenakker\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy is a primary treatment for uveal melanoma (UM), the most common intra-ocular malignancy in adults. This study evaluated the safety of Ru-106 applicators at 3 Tesla (T) MRI and their impact on image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic attraction and eddy currents were tested on a 20-mm-diameter Ru-106 applicator using a nylon string and a porcine eye. Safety criteria were defined by ocular oncologists, comparing magnetic field interactions to the forces exerted on the eye during surgery. Five UM patients were scanned at 3T MRI with the applicator in situ using both conventional anatomical sequences and scans optimised to reduce metal artefacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal magnetic interactions were observed. Eddy currents caused slight lagging during fast movements and temporary detachment of the applicator of the porcine eye in conditions that were considered unrealistic for clinical scans. Significant susceptibility artefacts compromised image quality of the affected eye.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Ru-106 applicators can be safely used in 3T MRI with some simple precautions. MR image quality of the eye was poor due to major susceptibility artefacts; however, imaging of extra-ocular anatomy is feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"13-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of MRI Safety of Ru-106 Eye Applicators.
Introduction: Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy is a primary treatment for uveal melanoma (UM), the most common intra-ocular malignancy in adults. This study evaluated the safety of Ru-106 applicators at 3 Tesla (T) MRI and their impact on image quality.
Methods: Magnetic attraction and eddy currents were tested on a 20-mm-diameter Ru-106 applicator using a nylon string and a porcine eye. Safety criteria were defined by ocular oncologists, comparing magnetic field interactions to the forces exerted on the eye during surgery. Five UM patients were scanned at 3T MRI with the applicator in situ using both conventional anatomical sequences and scans optimised to reduce metal artefacts.
Results: Minimal magnetic interactions were observed. Eddy currents caused slight lagging during fast movements and temporary detachment of the applicator of the porcine eye in conditions that were considered unrealistic for clinical scans. Significant susceptibility artefacts compromised image quality of the affected eye.
Conclusion: Patients with Ru-106 applicators can be safely used in 3T MRI with some simple precautions. MR image quality of the eye was poor due to major susceptibility artefacts; however, imaging of extra-ocular anatomy is feasible.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
