荷兰牙医参与正畸固位:监控、意见、能力和沟通差距。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marissa Manon Schreuder, Anne-Marie Renkema, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Jens Anne Daniel Padmos
{"title":"荷兰牙医参与正畸固位:监控、意见、能力和沟通差距。","authors":"Marissa Manon Schreuder, Anne-Marie Renkema, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Jens Anne Daniel Padmos","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>To assess Dutch dentists' experience, competence and opinions on various aspects of orthodontic retention with bonded retainers and identify any gaps that may exist in practice and communication.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected general dentists, covering their (i) experience, competence and opinion in bonded retainer monitoring and maintenance, (ii) knowledge of unintentional active bonded retainers, (iii) responsibility for bonded retainers, and (iv) orthodontic practitioners' communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 23.6% (n = 236). Orthodontic treatment was performed by 24% of dentists. Dentists were familiar with follow-up (98%), repairs (95%) and placement (77%) of bonded retainers. The more hours involved in treatment, the more competent they felt in repairing BRs (P = .025). However, over a quarter felt insufficiently competent in repairing (26%) and placement (33%) of bonded retainers. When patients requested their dentist to remove their bonded retainer, 89% informed them about possible consequences, and 41% referred them to their orthodontic practitioner. Awareness of torsional movements of anterior teeth due to unintentionally active bonded retainers was high (77%). Almost two thirds (64%) believed that dentists should check bonded retainers one year after placement. Respondents felt insufficiently informed by orthodontic practitioners regarding several aspects of the retention phase. One-third (34%) would appreciate additional training.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The main limitations of this study are the low response rate, which could result in non-response bias, and the focus on bonded retainers only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Dutch dentists are well informed about the possibility of torsional movements due to unintentionally active bonded retainers. Clear communication between orthodontic practitioners and dentists is essential for effective long-term follow-up and shared responsibility. Knowledge and skills regarding monitoring and maintenance of bonded retainers should be integrated into dental curricula and postgraduate courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dutch dentists' involvement in orthodontic retention: monitoring, opinions, competence and communication gaps.\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Manon Schreuder, Anne-Marie Renkema, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Jens Anne Daniel Padmos\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjaf020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>To assess Dutch dentists' experience, competence and opinions on various aspects of orthodontic retention with bonded retainers and identify any gaps that may exist in practice and communication.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected general dentists, covering their (i) experience, competence and opinion in bonded retainer monitoring and maintenance, (ii) knowledge of unintentional active bonded retainers, (iii) responsibility for bonded retainers, and (iv) orthodontic practitioners' communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 23.6% (n = 236). Orthodontic treatment was performed by 24% of dentists. Dentists were familiar with follow-up (98%), repairs (95%) and placement (77%) of bonded retainers. The more hours involved in treatment, the more competent they felt in repairing BRs (P = .025). However, over a quarter felt insufficiently competent in repairing (26%) and placement (33%) of bonded retainers. When patients requested their dentist to remove their bonded retainer, 89% informed them about possible consequences, and 41% referred them to their orthodontic practitioner. Awareness of torsional movements of anterior teeth due to unintentionally active bonded retainers was high (77%). Almost two thirds (64%) believed that dentists should check bonded retainers one year after placement. Respondents felt insufficiently informed by orthodontic practitioners regarding several aspects of the retention phase. One-third (34%) would appreciate additional training.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The main limitations of this study are the low response rate, which could result in non-response bias, and the focus on bonded retainers only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Dutch dentists are well informed about the possibility of torsional movements due to unintentionally active bonded retainers. Clear communication between orthodontic practitioners and dentists is essential for effective long-term follow-up and shared responsibility. Knowledge and skills regarding monitoring and maintenance of bonded retainers should be integrated into dental curricula and postgraduate courses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:评估荷兰牙医在粘接固位体正畸固位各方面的经验、能力和意见,并找出在实践和沟通中可能存在的差距。材料/方法:随机选择1000名普通牙医进行网络问卷调查,调查内容包括:(i)在保税固位体监测和维护方面的经验、能力和意见,(ii)对非故意主动保税固位体的了解,(iii)保税固位体的责任,以及(iv)正科医生的沟通情况。结果:有效率为23.6% (n = 236)。24%的牙医进行了正畸治疗。牙医对粘接固位器的随访(98%)、修复(95%)和放置(77%)熟悉。参与治疗的时间越长,他们对修复BRs的能力越强(P = 0.025)。然而,超过四分之一的人认为在修复(26%)和放置(33%)粘固器方面能力不足。当患者要求牙医移除固位器时,89%的患者会告知可能的后果,41%的患者会将其转介给正畸医生。意识到前牙的扭转运动是由于无意识的主动粘接固位器(77%)。几乎三分之二(64%)的人认为牙医应该在固定牙套一年后检查固定牙套。受访者认为正畸医生对固位阶段的几个方面的了解不够。三分之一(34%)的人希望接受额外的培训。局限性:本研究的主要局限性是反应率低,可能导致无反应偏差,并且只关注粘接固位者。结论/启示:荷兰牙医非常了解由于非故意活动的粘接固位器而导致扭转运动的可能性。正畸医生和牙医之间的清晰沟通对于有效的长期随访和共同承担责任至关重要。有关监测和维护保税固位器的知识和技能应纳入牙科课程和研究生课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dutch dentists' involvement in orthodontic retention: monitoring, opinions, competence and communication gaps.

Dutch dentists' involvement in orthodontic retention: monitoring, opinions, competence and communication gaps.

Dutch dentists' involvement in orthodontic retention: monitoring, opinions, competence and communication gaps.

Background/objectives: To assess Dutch dentists' experience, competence and opinions on various aspects of orthodontic retention with bonded retainers and identify any gaps that may exist in practice and communication.

Materials/methods: A web-based questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected general dentists, covering their (i) experience, competence and opinion in bonded retainer monitoring and maintenance, (ii) knowledge of unintentional active bonded retainers, (iii) responsibility for bonded retainers, and (iv) orthodontic practitioners' communication.

Results: The response rate was 23.6% (n = 236). Orthodontic treatment was performed by 24% of dentists. Dentists were familiar with follow-up (98%), repairs (95%) and placement (77%) of bonded retainers. The more hours involved in treatment, the more competent they felt in repairing BRs (P = .025). However, over a quarter felt insufficiently competent in repairing (26%) and placement (33%) of bonded retainers. When patients requested their dentist to remove their bonded retainer, 89% informed them about possible consequences, and 41% referred them to their orthodontic practitioner. Awareness of torsional movements of anterior teeth due to unintentionally active bonded retainers was high (77%). Almost two thirds (64%) believed that dentists should check bonded retainers one year after placement. Respondents felt insufficiently informed by orthodontic practitioners regarding several aspects of the retention phase. One-third (34%) would appreciate additional training.

Limitations: The main limitations of this study are the low response rate, which could result in non-response bias, and the focus on bonded retainers only.

Conclusions/implications: Dutch dentists are well informed about the possibility of torsional movements due to unintentionally active bonded retainers. Clear communication between orthodontic practitioners and dentists is essential for effective long-term follow-up and shared responsibility. Knowledge and skills regarding monitoring and maintenance of bonded retainers should be integrated into dental curricula and postgraduate courses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信