{"title":"基于非靶向代谢组学的多代谢物评分模型用于评估韩国肥胖个体的血脂异常。","authors":"Su-Geun Yang, Hye Jin Yoo","doi":"10.3390/metabo15040279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Metabolite risk score (MRS), which considers the collective effects of metabolites closely reflecting a phenotype, is a new approach for disease assessment, moving away from focusing solely on individual biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate a metabolite panel for dyslipidemia and verify the diagnostic efficacy of MRS on dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key metabolite identification and MRS establishment were conducted in the discovery set, and MRS validation was performed in the replication set, with 50 healthy individuals and 50 dyslipidemia patients in each set. The MRS was constructed using key metabolites, identified via UPLC-MS/MS analysis, employing a weighted approach based on linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam and eicosapentaenoic acid were identified as key metabolites for dyslipidemia and were utilized for establishing the MRS. In addition to the MRS model, a conventional dyslipidemia diagnostic model based on lipid profiles, as well as a combined model (MRS + lipid profiles), were also established. In the discovery set, the MRS model diagnosed dyslipidemia with 85.4% accuracy. When combined with lipid profiles, accuracy improved to 91.8%. In the replication set, the MRS demonstrated diagnostic power with 76.1% accuracy, while the combined model achieved 86.0% accuracy for dyslipidemia assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS alone indicated sufficient assessment power in a real-world setting, despite a slight reduction in assessment ability when validated in the replication set. At this stage, therefore, the MRS serves as an auxiliary tool for disease diagnosis. This first attempt to apply MRS for dyslipidemia may offer a foundational concept for MRS in this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoring Model Using Multi-Metabolites Based on Untargeted Metabolomics for Assessing Dyslipidemia in Korean Individuals with Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Su-Geun Yang, Hye Jin Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/metabo15040279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Metabolite risk score (MRS), which considers the collective effects of metabolites closely reflecting a phenotype, is a new approach for disease assessment, moving away from focusing solely on individual biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate a metabolite panel for dyslipidemia and verify the diagnostic efficacy of MRS on dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key metabolite identification and MRS establishment were conducted in the discovery set, and MRS validation was performed in the replication set, with 50 healthy individuals and 50 dyslipidemia patients in each set. The MRS was constructed using key metabolites, identified via UPLC-MS/MS analysis, employing a weighted approach based on linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam and eicosapentaenoic acid were identified as key metabolites for dyslipidemia and were utilized for establishing the MRS. In addition to the MRS model, a conventional dyslipidemia diagnostic model based on lipid profiles, as well as a combined model (MRS + lipid profiles), were also established. In the discovery set, the MRS model diagnosed dyslipidemia with 85.4% accuracy. When combined with lipid profiles, accuracy improved to 91.8%. In the replication set, the MRS demonstrated diagnostic power with 76.1% accuracy, while the combined model achieved 86.0% accuracy for dyslipidemia assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS alone indicated sufficient assessment power in a real-world setting, despite a slight reduction in assessment ability when validated in the replication set. At this stage, therefore, the MRS serves as an auxiliary tool for disease diagnosis. This first attempt to apply MRS for dyslipidemia may offer a foundational concept for MRS in this disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolites\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040279\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Scoring Model Using Multi-Metabolites Based on Untargeted Metabolomics for Assessing Dyslipidemia in Korean Individuals with Obesity.
Background/objectives: Metabolite risk score (MRS), which considers the collective effects of metabolites closely reflecting a phenotype, is a new approach for disease assessment, moving away from focusing solely on individual biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate a metabolite panel for dyslipidemia and verify the diagnostic efficacy of MRS on dyslipidemia.
Methods: Key metabolite identification and MRS establishment were conducted in the discovery set, and MRS validation was performed in the replication set, with 50 healthy individuals and 50 dyslipidemia patients in each set. The MRS was constructed using key metabolites, identified via UPLC-MS/MS analysis, employing a weighted approach based on linear regression analysis.
Results: N-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam and eicosapentaenoic acid were identified as key metabolites for dyslipidemia and were utilized for establishing the MRS. In addition to the MRS model, a conventional dyslipidemia diagnostic model based on lipid profiles, as well as a combined model (MRS + lipid profiles), were also established. In the discovery set, the MRS model diagnosed dyslipidemia with 85.4% accuracy. When combined with lipid profiles, accuracy improved to 91.8%. In the replication set, the MRS demonstrated diagnostic power with 76.1% accuracy, while the combined model achieved 86.0% accuracy for dyslipidemia assessment.
Conclusions: The MRS alone indicated sufficient assessment power in a real-world setting, despite a slight reduction in assessment ability when validated in the replication set. At this stage, therefore, the MRS serves as an auxiliary tool for disease diagnosis. This first attempt to apply MRS for dyslipidemia may offer a foundational concept for MRS in this disease.
MetabolitesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍:
Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.