高血压患者自我管理评估工具:范围综述

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Li Mengjiao, Zhao Xujie, Jiang Ping, Huang Liwen, Ning Yuping, Zhang Yangjing, Yan Jianjun
{"title":"高血压患者自我管理评估工具:范围综述","authors":"Li Mengjiao, Zhao Xujie, Jiang Ping, Huang Liwen, Ning Yuping, Zhang Yangjing, Yan Jianjun","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04134-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This is a scoping review of the evidence for the use of the Patient Self-Management Assessment Tool for Hypertension (PAT) in people with hypertension. This review examines the content features, reliability, and validity of the PAT for people with Hypertension, as well as contextual and environmental evidence for the tool implementation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize and evaluate the self-management assessment tools available for people with hypertensive, and to guide healthcare professionals in selecting appropriate tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), VIP (VIP Information Database), CMB (China Biology Medicine disc) and Wanfang, from their inception to August 17, 2024. The authors extracted and analyzed self-management assessment tools developed for people with hypertension, using a scoping review approach to report the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 papers were identified, which reported on 20 assessment tools. These included 12 multidimensional assessment tools for assessing self-management and 8 unidimensional assessment tools for measuring adherence to self-management practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of self-management assessment tools for people with hypertension varies widely. There is a need to develop tailored tools for different patient populations to accurately assess self-management capabilities, design intervention strategies, and enhance patient engagement in hypertension management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-management assessment tools for people with hypertension: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Li Mengjiao, Zhao Xujie, Jiang Ping, Huang Liwen, Ning Yuping, Zhang Yangjing, Yan Jianjun\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04134-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This is a scoping review of the evidence for the use of the Patient Self-Management Assessment Tool for Hypertension (PAT) in people with hypertension. This review examines the content features, reliability, and validity of the PAT for people with Hypertension, as well as contextual and environmental evidence for the tool implementation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize and evaluate the self-management assessment tools available for people with hypertensive, and to guide healthcare professionals in selecting appropriate tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), VIP (VIP Information Database), CMB (China Biology Medicine disc) and Wanfang, from their inception to August 17, 2024. The authors extracted and analyzed self-management assessment tools developed for people with hypertension, using a scoping review approach to report the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 papers were identified, which reported on 20 assessment tools. These included 12 multidimensional assessment tools for assessing self-management and 8 unidimensional assessment tools for measuring adherence to self-management practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of self-management assessment tools for people with hypertension varies widely. There is a need to develop tailored tools for different patient populations to accurately assess self-management capabilities, design intervention strategies, and enhance patient engagement in hypertension management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04134-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04134-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这是一篇关于高血压患者自我管理评估工具(PAT)在高血压患者中的应用的证据综述。本综述探讨了高血压患者PAT的内容特征、可靠性和有效性,以及该工具在临床实践中实施的背景和环境证据。目的:对现有的高血压患者自我管理评估工具进行综合评价,指导医护人员选择合适的工具。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI、VIP、CMB、万方等9个数据库自建库至2024年8月17日的数据。作者提取并分析了为高血压患者开发的自我管理评估工具,使用范围审查方法报告了研究结果。结果:共检索到41篇论文,涉及20种评估工具。其中包括用于评估自我管理的12个多维评估工具和用于衡量自我管理实践遵守情况的8个一维评估工具。结论:高血压患者自我管理评估工具的质量参差不齐。有必要为不同的患者群体开发量身定制的工具,以准确评估自我管理能力,设计干预策略,并提高患者对高血压管理的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-management assessment tools for people with hypertension: a scoping review.

Background: This is a scoping review of the evidence for the use of the Patient Self-Management Assessment Tool for Hypertension (PAT) in people with hypertension. This review examines the content features, reliability, and validity of the PAT for people with Hypertension, as well as contextual and environmental evidence for the tool implementation in clinical practice.

Objective: To synthesize and evaluate the self-management assessment tools available for people with hypertensive, and to guide healthcare professionals in selecting appropriate tools.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), VIP (VIP Information Database), CMB (China Biology Medicine disc) and Wanfang, from their inception to August 17, 2024. The authors extracted and analyzed self-management assessment tools developed for people with hypertension, using a scoping review approach to report the findings.

Results: A total of 41 papers were identified, which reported on 20 assessment tools. These included 12 multidimensional assessment tools for assessing self-management and 8 unidimensional assessment tools for measuring adherence to self-management practices.

Conclusion: The quality of self-management assessment tools for people with hypertension varies widely. There is a need to develop tailored tools for different patient populations to accurately assess self-management capabilities, design intervention strategies, and enhance patient engagement in hypertension management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信