非洲的声音及其在改善生物多样性保护的南北合作中的作用。

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kudzai Shaun Mpakairi, Tatenda Dalu, Olga Laiza Kupika, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Blessing Kavhu, Justice Muvengwi, Victor K Muposhi, Henry Ndaimani, Tinaapi Hilary Madiri, Edson Gandiwa, Edmond Sanganyado
{"title":"非洲的声音及其在改善生物多样性保护的南北合作中的作用。","authors":"Kudzai Shaun Mpakairi, Tatenda Dalu, Olga Laiza Kupika, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Blessing Kavhu, Justice Muvengwi, Victor K Muposhi, Henry Ndaimani, Tinaapi Hilary Madiri, Edson Gandiwa, Edmond Sanganyado","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the dominance of policies from the Global North has shaped conservation practices, holistic decision-making is urgently needed to incorporate more local voices, especially in Africa. Effective conservation strategies may be enhanced by incorporating the expertise and resources of the Global North alongside the knowledge, lived experiences, insights, and leadership of local communities, scientists, and civil society groups from the Global South. This approach fosters mutual respect, equitable partnerships, and shared accountability and moves away from parachute conservation models toward more inclusive and context-sensitive solutions for biodiversity conservation. We advocate for eliminating parachute conservation practices in Africa and emphasize the importance of more inclusive strategies prioritizing equitable north-south collaborations to address pressing biodiversity challenges. Key challenges in Africa include financial transparency issues, misaligned philanthropy, unbalanced representation of Indigenous perspectives, and the influence of international organizations. Possible mechanisms to move away from conservation practices driven by colonial legacies, legacies in which policies are often developed in the Global North and imposed on the Global South, sometimes without prior informed consent, include free, prior, and informed consent on projects and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. By prioritizing the voices of local communities, including local scientific expertise and Indigenous knowledge systems, we posit that a more just and sustainable global environmental policy framework can be realized that can contribute to the long-term well-being of the planet and its people.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.\",\"authors\":\"Kudzai Shaun Mpakairi, Tatenda Dalu, Olga Laiza Kupika, Paradzayi Tagwireyi, Blessing Kavhu, Justice Muvengwi, Victor K Muposhi, Henry Ndaimani, Tinaapi Hilary Madiri, Edson Gandiwa, Edmond Sanganyado\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While the dominance of policies from the Global North has shaped conservation practices, holistic decision-making is urgently needed to incorporate more local voices, especially in Africa. Effective conservation strategies may be enhanced by incorporating the expertise and resources of the Global North alongside the knowledge, lived experiences, insights, and leadership of local communities, scientists, and civil society groups from the Global South. This approach fosters mutual respect, equitable partnerships, and shared accountability and moves away from parachute conservation models toward more inclusive and context-sensitive solutions for biodiversity conservation. We advocate for eliminating parachute conservation practices in Africa and emphasize the importance of more inclusive strategies prioritizing equitable north-south collaborations to address pressing biodiversity challenges. Key challenges in Africa include financial transparency issues, misaligned philanthropy, unbalanced representation of Indigenous perspectives, and the influence of international organizations. Possible mechanisms to move away from conservation practices driven by colonial legacies, legacies in which policies are often developed in the Global North and imposed on the Global South, sometimes without prior informed consent, include free, prior, and informed consent on projects and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. By prioritizing the voices of local communities, including local scientific expertise and Indigenous knowledge systems, we posit that a more just and sustainable global environmental policy framework can be realized that can contribute to the long-term well-being of the planet and its people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然全球北方的政策主导了保护实践,但迫切需要全面的决策,以吸收更多的地方声音,特别是在非洲。通过结合全球北方的专业知识和资源,以及来自全球南方的当地社区、科学家和民间社会团体的知识、生活经验、见解和领导,可以加强有效的保护战略。这种方法促进了相互尊重、公平的伙伴关系和共同的问责制,并从降落伞保护模式转向更具包容性和对环境敏感的生物多样性保护解决方案。我们主张取消非洲的降落伞保护做法,强调制定更具包容性战略的重要性,优先考虑公平的南北合作,以应对紧迫的生物多样性挑战。非洲面临的主要挑战包括金融透明度问题、错位的慈善事业、土著观点的不平衡代表以及国际组织的影响。摆脱由殖民遗产驱动的保护实践的可能机制,包括对项目的自由、事先和知情同意以及公平的利益分享机制。在这些遗产中,政策往往是在全球北方制定的,并强加给全球南方,有时没有事先知情同意。通过优先考虑当地社区的声音,包括当地科学专业知识和土著知识系统,我们认为可以实现一个更加公正和可持续的全球环境政策框架,这将有助于地球及其人民的长期福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.

While the dominance of policies from the Global North has shaped conservation practices, holistic decision-making is urgently needed to incorporate more local voices, especially in Africa. Effective conservation strategies may be enhanced by incorporating the expertise and resources of the Global North alongside the knowledge, lived experiences, insights, and leadership of local communities, scientists, and civil society groups from the Global South. This approach fosters mutual respect, equitable partnerships, and shared accountability and moves away from parachute conservation models toward more inclusive and context-sensitive solutions for biodiversity conservation. We advocate for eliminating parachute conservation practices in Africa and emphasize the importance of more inclusive strategies prioritizing equitable north-south collaborations to address pressing biodiversity challenges. Key challenges in Africa include financial transparency issues, misaligned philanthropy, unbalanced representation of Indigenous perspectives, and the influence of international organizations. Possible mechanisms to move away from conservation practices driven by colonial legacies, legacies in which policies are often developed in the Global North and imposed on the Global South, sometimes without prior informed consent, include free, prior, and informed consent on projects and equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms. By prioritizing the voices of local communities, including local scientific expertise and Indigenous knowledge systems, we posit that a more just and sustainable global environmental policy framework can be realized that can contribute to the long-term well-being of the planet and its people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信