变应性鼻炎对尘螨过敏原特异性免疫治疗反应的个体差异:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Dandan Fang, Jiajia Wang, Jingyun Li, Luo Zhang, Yuan Zhang
{"title":"变应性鼻炎对尘螨过敏原特异性免疫治疗反应的个体差异:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Dandan Fang, Jiajia Wang, Jingyun Li, Luo Zhang, Yuan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2499596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The variability in the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for nasal symptom control can be attributed to individual differences, to explore the hypothesis of systematic variability in AR symptom alleviation with AIT and to determine whether this variability correlates with AR severity, route of administration, treatment duration, age, or study publication year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AIT for dust mite (DM)-induced AR, extracting data on baseline mean, endpoint mean, standard deviation (SD), and participant numbers. A random-slope mixed-effects model (RSMM) was employed to evaluate the differences in variability between the AIT and control groups, as well as to identify potential influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in response variability between the AIT and control groups. The response variability to AIT was not associated with AR severity, route of administration, age, or year of publication. The cohort that underwent 36 months of AIT exhibited a higher degree of response variability compared to the group treated for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study did not identify systematic variability in individual response to AIT when measured by TNSS alone. More refined outcome measures and more associated factors are needed to explore personalized AIT in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in response to dust-mite-allergen specific immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Dandan Fang, Jiajia Wang, Jingyun Li, Luo Zhang, Yuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2499596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The variability in the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for nasal symptom control can be attributed to individual differences, to explore the hypothesis of systematic variability in AR symptom alleviation with AIT and to determine whether this variability correlates with AR severity, route of administration, treatment duration, age, or study publication year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AIT for dust mite (DM)-induced AR, extracting data on baseline mean, endpoint mean, standard deviation (SD), and participant numbers. A random-slope mixed-effects model (RSMM) was employed to evaluate the differences in variability between the AIT and control groups, as well as to identify potential influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in response variability between the AIT and control groups. The response variability to AIT was not associated with AR severity, route of administration, age, or year of publication. The cohort that underwent 36 months of AIT exhibited a higher degree of response variability compared to the group treated for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study did not identify systematic variability in individual response to AIT when measured by TNSS alone. More refined outcome measures and more associated factors are needed to explore personalized AIT in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2499596\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2499596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:过敏原特异性免疫治疗(AIT)对鼻腔症状控制的疗效差异可归因于个体差异,探讨AIT缓解AR症状的系统性变异性假设,并确定这种变异性是否与AR严重程度、给药途径、治疗时间、年龄或研究发表年份相关。方法:我们回顾了尘螨(DM)诱导AR的AIT随机对照试验(rct),提取了基线平均值、终点平均值、标准差(SD)和参与者人数的数据。采用随机-斜率混合效应模型(RSMM)评估AIT组与对照组之间变异性的差异,并确定潜在的影响因素。结果:AIT组与对照组的反应变异性无显著差异。对AIT的反应变异性与AR严重程度、给药途径、年龄或发表年份无关。接受36个月AIT治疗的队列与接受6个月AIT治疗的组相比,表现出更高程度的反应变异性。结论:目前的研究没有发现单独使用TNSS测量个体对AIT反应的系统性变异性。未来需要更精细的结果测量和更多的相关因素来探索个性化的AIT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual differences in response to dust-mite-allergen specific immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: The variability in the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for nasal symptom control can be attributed to individual differences, to explore the hypothesis of systematic variability in AR symptom alleviation with AIT and to determine whether this variability correlates with AR severity, route of administration, treatment duration, age, or study publication year.

Methods: We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AIT for dust mite (DM)-induced AR, extracting data on baseline mean, endpoint mean, standard deviation (SD), and participant numbers. A random-slope mixed-effects model (RSMM) was employed to evaluate the differences in variability between the AIT and control groups, as well as to identify potential influencing factors.

Results: There was no significant difference in response variability between the AIT and control groups. The response variability to AIT was not associated with AR severity, route of administration, age, or year of publication. The cohort that underwent 36 months of AIT exhibited a higher degree of response variability compared to the group treated for 6 months.

Conclusion: The present study did not identify systematic variability in individual response to AIT when measured by TNSS alone. More refined outcome measures and more associated factors are needed to explore personalized AIT in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信