参与患者的性问题:全科医生和妇产科医生的比较研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Aromaa, Katja Kero, Sanna-Mari Manninen, Tero Vahlberg, Päivi Polo-Kantola
{"title":"参与患者的性问题:全科医生和妇产科医生的比较研究。","authors":"Anna Aromaa, Katja Kero, Sanna-Mari Manninen, Tero Vahlberg, Päivi Polo-Kantola","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Even though good sexual health is an important part of well-being, the evaluation of patients' sexual problems is not necessarily routine for physicians. We compared engagement (attitudes, barriers to bringing up, and practice patterns) with patients' sexual problems among general practitioners (GPs) and obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) with special regard for the sex and age of the physician.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was used for data collection from 2 samples of physicians. The completed questionnaires from 402 GPs and 299 OB/GYNs were eligible for analysis. In the statistical analysis, the GPs were compared with the OB/GYNs as entire groups with multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. In addition, interaction and subgroup analysis by sex and age groups were both carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered treating sexual problems to be an important health care practice. However, compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were less likely to inquire about sexual problems during general medical history-taking [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.33, P < 0.0001] and more likely to consider diagnosing female sexual problems as being difficult (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.0001). Compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were more likely to report having barriers-for example, \"shortness of the appointment time\" (aOR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53-3.63, P < 0.0001), \"personal attitudes and beliefs\" (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.41-3.67, P = 0.001), and \"lack of knowledge about sexual medicine\" (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered the treatment of sexual problems to be an important health care practice; however, the engagement with patients' sexual problems among GPs was less structured.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement with patients' sexual problems: a comparative study among general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Aromaa, Katja Kero, Sanna-Mari Manninen, Tero Vahlberg, Päivi Polo-Kantola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GME.0000000000002551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Even though good sexual health is an important part of well-being, the evaluation of patients' sexual problems is not necessarily routine for physicians. We compared engagement (attitudes, barriers to bringing up, and practice patterns) with patients' sexual problems among general practitioners (GPs) and obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) with special regard for the sex and age of the physician.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was used for data collection from 2 samples of physicians. The completed questionnaires from 402 GPs and 299 OB/GYNs were eligible for analysis. In the statistical analysis, the GPs were compared with the OB/GYNs as entire groups with multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. In addition, interaction and subgroup analysis by sex and age groups were both carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered treating sexual problems to be an important health care practice. However, compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were less likely to inquire about sexual problems during general medical history-taking [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.33, P < 0.0001] and more likely to consider diagnosing female sexual problems as being difficult (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.0001). Compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were more likely to report having barriers-for example, \\\"shortness of the appointment time\\\" (aOR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53-3.63, P < 0.0001), \\\"personal attitudes and beliefs\\\" (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.41-3.67, P = 0.001), and \\\"lack of knowledge about sexual medicine\\\" (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered the treatment of sexual problems to be an important health care practice; however, the engagement with patients' sexual problems among GPs was less structured.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002551\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管良好的性健康是幸福的重要组成部分,但医生对患者性问题的评估并不一定是常规的。我们比较了全科医生(gp)和妇产科医生(OB/GYNs)的参与(态度、抚养障碍和实践模式)与患者的性问题,特别考虑了医生的性别和年龄。方法:采用基于网络的问卷调查法,对2名医生进行数据收集。402名全科医生和299名妇产科医生完成问卷,符合分析条件。在统计分析中,将全科医生与妇产科医生作为整个组进行比较,采用经性别和年龄调整的多变量二元logistic回归。此外,还进行了相互作用和按性别和年龄分组的亚组分析。结果:全科医生和妇产科医生都认为治疗性问题是一项重要的卫生保健实践。然而,与妇产科医生相比,全科医生在一般病史中询问性问题的可能性较小[调整优势比(aOR): 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.33, P < 0.0001],更有可能认为诊断女性性问题很困难(aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.0001)。与妇产科医生相比,全科医生更容易报告遇到障碍,例如“预约时间短”(aOR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53-3.63, P < 0.0001)、“个人态度和信念”(aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.41-3.67, P = 0.001)和“缺乏性医学知识”(aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001)。结论:全科医生和妇产科医生都认为性问题的治疗是一项重要的卫生保健工作;然而,全科医生对患者性问题的参与却没有那么有条理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engagement with patients' sexual problems: a comparative study among general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Objectives: Even though good sexual health is an important part of well-being, the evaluation of patients' sexual problems is not necessarily routine for physicians. We compared engagement (attitudes, barriers to bringing up, and practice patterns) with patients' sexual problems among general practitioners (GPs) and obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) with special regard for the sex and age of the physician.

Methods: A web-based questionnaire was used for data collection from 2 samples of physicians. The completed questionnaires from 402 GPs and 299 OB/GYNs were eligible for analysis. In the statistical analysis, the GPs were compared with the OB/GYNs as entire groups with multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. In addition, interaction and subgroup analysis by sex and age groups were both carried out.

Results: Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered treating sexual problems to be an important health care practice. However, compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were less likely to inquire about sexual problems during general medical history-taking [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.33, P < 0.0001] and more likely to consider diagnosing female sexual problems as being difficult (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.0001). Compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were more likely to report having barriers-for example, "shortness of the appointment time" (aOR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53-3.63, P < 0.0001), "personal attitudes and beliefs" (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.41-3.67, P = 0.001), and "lack of knowledge about sexual medicine" (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered the treatment of sexual problems to be an important health care practice; however, the engagement with patients' sexual problems among GPs was less structured.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信