Chris Xie Chen, Ran Wang, Forrest Tin Wai Cheung, Amy Wing Yin Ho, Chung Shun Ho, Ngan Yin Chan, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Wai Kai Hou, Suk-Yu Yau, Yan Liu, Tatia Mei Chun Lee, Shirley Xin Li, Yun Kwok Wing
{"title":"一种用于测量健康成人昏暗光线下褪黑激素起效时间的改进的家庭方法。","authors":"Chris Xie Chen, Ran Wang, Forrest Tin Wai Cheung, Amy Wing Yin Ho, Chung Shun Ho, Ngan Yin Chan, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Wai Kai Hou, Suk-Yu Yau, Yan Liu, Tatia Mei Chun Lee, Shirley Xin Li, Yun Kwok Wing","doi":"10.1080/07420528.2025.2500404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study was to investigate whether a modified at-home dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) assessment would be comparable to the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Fifty-five participants underwent the at-home DLMO, while 55 age- and sex-matched participants underwent the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Each participant underwent 14 d of actigraphy monitoring with sleep diary, one overnight polysomnography (PSG), followed by another night for DLMO assessment, either in the laboratory or at home. The at-home DLMO and the in-laboratory DLMO were correlated to chronotype and habitual sleep wake time. DLMOs, compliance with the sampling time and dim lighting were compared between the two groups. The DLMOs were similar between at-home and in-laboratory assessments (Absolute threshold: 22:14 h at home and 22:30 h at in-laboratory, <i>p</i> = 0.18; Relative threshold: 21:42 h at home and 22:19 h at in-laboratory, <i>p</i> = 0.17). The earlier at-home DLMO and earlier in-laboratory DLMO were both moderately correlated to earlier chronotype and earlier sleep wake time. The compliance with the scheduled sampling time was slightly lower than that in the laboratory, while the compliance with dim lighting was comparable between the at-home group and the in-laboratory group. Our modified at-home assessment of DLMO is a feasible and valid alternative to the in-laboratory assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10294,"journal":{"name":"Chronobiology International","volume":" ","pages":"653-663"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified at-home methodology for measuring dim light melatonin onset timing in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Xie Chen, Ran Wang, Forrest Tin Wai Cheung, Amy Wing Yin Ho, Chung Shun Ho, Ngan Yin Chan, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Wai Kai Hou, Suk-Yu Yau, Yan Liu, Tatia Mei Chun Lee, Shirley Xin Li, Yun Kwok Wing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07420528.2025.2500404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of this study was to investigate whether a modified at-home dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) assessment would be comparable to the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Fifty-five participants underwent the at-home DLMO, while 55 age- and sex-matched participants underwent the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Each participant underwent 14 d of actigraphy monitoring with sleep diary, one overnight polysomnography (PSG), followed by another night for DLMO assessment, either in the laboratory or at home. The at-home DLMO and the in-laboratory DLMO were correlated to chronotype and habitual sleep wake time. DLMOs, compliance with the sampling time and dim lighting were compared between the two groups. The DLMOs were similar between at-home and in-laboratory assessments (Absolute threshold: 22:14 h at home and 22:30 h at in-laboratory, <i>p</i> = 0.18; Relative threshold: 21:42 h at home and 22:19 h at in-laboratory, <i>p</i> = 0.17). The earlier at-home DLMO and earlier in-laboratory DLMO were both moderately correlated to earlier chronotype and earlier sleep wake time. The compliance with the scheduled sampling time was slightly lower than that in the laboratory, while the compliance with dim lighting was comparable between the at-home group and the in-laboratory group. Our modified at-home assessment of DLMO is a feasible and valid alternative to the in-laboratory assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronobiology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"653-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronobiology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2025.2500404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronobiology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2025.2500404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是调查改进的家庭昏暗灯光褪黑激素发作(DLMO)评估是否与实验室DLMO评估相当。55名参与者接受了家庭DLMO,而55名年龄和性别匹配的参与者接受了实验室DLMO评估。每个参与者都接受了14天的睡眠日记活动监测,一个晚上的多导睡眠描记仪(PSG),然后另一个晚上在实验室或家中进行DLMO评估。家庭DLMO和实验室DLMO与睡眠类型和习惯性睡眠唤醒时间相关。比较两组患者的DLMOs、对采样时间的依从性和灯光亮度。在家和实验室评估的dlmo相似(绝对阈值:在家22:14 h和实验室22:30 h, p = 0.18;相对阈值:在家21:42 h,实验室22:19 h, p = 0.17)。较早的在家DLMO和较早的实验室DLMO与较早的睡眠类型和较早的睡眠唤醒时间均有中度相关。对计划采样时间的依从性略低于实验室,而对昏暗照明的依从性在家庭组和实验室组之间相当。我们改进的在家评估DLMO是一种可行和有效的替代实验室评估。
A modified at-home methodology for measuring dim light melatonin onset timing in healthy adults.
The goal of this study was to investigate whether a modified at-home dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) assessment would be comparable to the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Fifty-five participants underwent the at-home DLMO, while 55 age- and sex-matched participants underwent the in-laboratory DLMO assessment. Each participant underwent 14 d of actigraphy monitoring with sleep diary, one overnight polysomnography (PSG), followed by another night for DLMO assessment, either in the laboratory or at home. The at-home DLMO and the in-laboratory DLMO were correlated to chronotype and habitual sleep wake time. DLMOs, compliance with the sampling time and dim lighting were compared between the two groups. The DLMOs were similar between at-home and in-laboratory assessments (Absolute threshold: 22:14 h at home and 22:30 h at in-laboratory, p = 0.18; Relative threshold: 21:42 h at home and 22:19 h at in-laboratory, p = 0.17). The earlier at-home DLMO and earlier in-laboratory DLMO were both moderately correlated to earlier chronotype and earlier sleep wake time. The compliance with the scheduled sampling time was slightly lower than that in the laboratory, while the compliance with dim lighting was comparable between the at-home group and the in-laboratory group. Our modified at-home assessment of DLMO is a feasible and valid alternative to the in-laboratory assessment.
期刊介绍:
Chronobiology International is the journal of biological and medical rhythm research. It is a transdisciplinary journal focusing on biological rhythm phenomena of all life forms. The journal publishes groundbreaking articles plus authoritative review papers, short communications of work in progress, case studies, and letters to the editor, for example, on genetic and molecular mechanisms of insect, animal and human biological timekeeping, including melatonin and pineal gland rhythms. It also publishes applied topics, for example, shiftwork, chronotypes, and associated personality traits; chronobiology and chronotherapy of sleep, cardiovascular, pulmonary, psychiatric, and other medical conditions. Articles in the journal pertain to basic and applied chronobiology, and to methods, statistics, and instrumentation for biological rhythm study.
Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/page/cbi/Description