关节内臭氧与类固醇注射治疗粘连性囊炎的比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Clinical Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s10067-025-07471-3
Ali Sahillioğlu, Aylin Ayyıldız, Tülay Şahin
{"title":"关节内臭氧与类固醇注射治疗粘连性囊炎的比较。","authors":"Ali Sahillioğlu, Aylin Ayyıldız, Tülay Şahin","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07471-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adhesive capsulitis is a disease characterized by a significant decrease in the active and passive range of motion(ROM) of the glenohumeral joint along with pain. Ozone therapy has demonstrated promising results in treating various diseases. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intraarticular ozone administration with steroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study is a single-blind, prospective and comparative clinical trial. The study included 40 patients who were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The study group received 8 sessions of intra-articular ozone injection under ultrasound guidance, while the control group received a single intra-articular steroid injection. Patient evaluations were conducted before treatment, as well as 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The study utilized three evaluation scales: the visual analog scale(VAS) for pain, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and ROM measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in range of motion, SPADI, and VAS scores compared to their values at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the magnitude of improvement across these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results demonstrate that ozone injection repeated eight times led to improvements in pain, function, and range of motion that were not statistically different from those observed with a single corticosteroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis. Although the study was not designed as a non-inferiority trial, the findings suggest that intra-articular ozone administration may be a potentially beneficial alternative treatment option. Key Points • This study demonstrates that intra-articular ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injection resulted in significant clinical improvements in pain, function, and range of motion in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis. • Despite differences in injection frequency, both ozone and corticosteroid injections led to improvements, with no statistically significant difference between groups. • This study contributes to the limited literature on ozone therapy for adhesive capsulitis and suggests its potential as an alternative to corticosteroid injection, particularly for patients who may not tolerate steroids. • Further research with longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of ozone therapy in adhesive capsulitis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"2517-2525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intra-articular ozone and steroid injection in patients with adhesive capsulitis.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Sahillioğlu, Aylin Ayyıldız, Tülay Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-025-07471-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adhesive capsulitis is a disease characterized by a significant decrease in the active and passive range of motion(ROM) of the glenohumeral joint along with pain. Ozone therapy has demonstrated promising results in treating various diseases. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intraarticular ozone administration with steroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study is a single-blind, prospective and comparative clinical trial. The study included 40 patients who were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The study group received 8 sessions of intra-articular ozone injection under ultrasound guidance, while the control group received a single intra-articular steroid injection. Patient evaluations were conducted before treatment, as well as 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The study utilized three evaluation scales: the visual analog scale(VAS) for pain, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and ROM measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in range of motion, SPADI, and VAS scores compared to their values at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the magnitude of improvement across these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results demonstrate that ozone injection repeated eight times led to improvements in pain, function, and range of motion that were not statistically different from those observed with a single corticosteroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis. Although the study was not designed as a non-inferiority trial, the findings suggest that intra-articular ozone administration may be a potentially beneficial alternative treatment option. Key Points • This study demonstrates that intra-articular ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injection resulted in significant clinical improvements in pain, function, and range of motion in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis. • Despite differences in injection frequency, both ozone and corticosteroid injections led to improvements, with no statistically significant difference between groups. • This study contributes to the limited literature on ozone therapy for adhesive capsulitis and suggests its potential as an alternative to corticosteroid injection, particularly for patients who may not tolerate steroids. • Further research with longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of ozone therapy in adhesive capsulitis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2517-2525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07471-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07471-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:粘连性肩关节囊炎是一种以关节主动和被动活动度(ROM)显著降低并伴有疼痛为特征的疾病。臭氧疗法在治疗各种疾病方面已显示出良好的效果。本研究旨在比较关节内臭氧与类固醇注射治疗粘连性囊炎的疗效。方法:采用单盲、前瞻性、比较性临床试验。该研究包括40名患者,他们被随机分为两组。研究组在超声引导下接受8次关节内臭氧注射,对照组接受单次关节内类固醇注射。治疗前、治疗后4周和12周分别对患者进行评估。研究采用三种评估量表:疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和ROM测量。结果:与基线和第4周和第12周相比,两个治疗组在运动范围、SPADI和VAS评分方面均表现出统计学上显著的改善。然而,在这些结果的改善程度上,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,重复8次臭氧注射可改善疼痛、功能和活动范围,与单次皮质类固醇注射治疗粘连性囊炎的效果无统计学差异。尽管该研究并非设计为非劣效性试验,但研究结果表明,关节内臭氧治疗可能是一种潜在有益的替代治疗选择。•本研究表明,关节内臭氧(O2-O3)注射可显著改善原发性粘连性囊炎患者的疼痛、功能和活动范围。•尽管注射频率不同,但臭氧和皮质类固醇注射均可改善,组间无统计学差异。•本研究补充了关于臭氧治疗粘连性囊炎的有限文献,并提示其作为皮质类固醇注射的替代方案,特别是对于不能耐受类固醇的患者。•有必要进行更长的随访期的进一步研究,以确认臭氧治疗在胶囊炎治疗中的长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of intra-articular ozone and steroid injection in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Objective: Adhesive capsulitis is a disease characterized by a significant decrease in the active and passive range of motion(ROM) of the glenohumeral joint along with pain. Ozone therapy has demonstrated promising results in treating various diseases. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intraarticular ozone administration with steroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis.

Methods: Our study is a single-blind, prospective and comparative clinical trial. The study included 40 patients who were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The study group received 8 sessions of intra-articular ozone injection under ultrasound guidance, while the control group received a single intra-articular steroid injection. Patient evaluations were conducted before treatment, as well as 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The study utilized three evaluation scales: the visual analog scale(VAS) for pain, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and ROM measurements.

Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in range of motion, SPADI, and VAS scores compared to their values at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the magnitude of improvement across these outcomes.

Conclusion: The study results demonstrate that ozone injection repeated eight times led to improvements in pain, function, and range of motion that were not statistically different from those observed with a single corticosteroid injection in treating adhesive capsulitis. Although the study was not designed as a non-inferiority trial, the findings suggest that intra-articular ozone administration may be a potentially beneficial alternative treatment option. Key Points • This study demonstrates that intra-articular ozone (O2-O3) injection resulted in significant clinical improvements in pain, function, and range of motion in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis. • Despite differences in injection frequency, both ozone and corticosteroid injections led to improvements, with no statistically significant difference between groups. • This study contributes to the limited literature on ozone therapy for adhesive capsulitis and suggests its potential as an alternative to corticosteroid injection, particularly for patients who may not tolerate steroids. • Further research with longer follow-up periods is warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of ozone therapy in adhesive capsulitis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信