基于人工智能的视网膜前膜手术成像生物标志物评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.1177/11206721251337139
Cesare Mariotti, Lorenzo Mangoni, Alessio Muzi, Michele Fella, Veronica Mogetta, Giacomo Bongiovanni, Clara Rizzo, Jay Chhablani, Edoardo Midena, Marco Lupidi
{"title":"基于人工智能的视网膜前膜手术成像生物标志物评估。","authors":"Cesare Mariotti, Lorenzo Mangoni, Alessio Muzi, Michele Fella, Veronica Mogetta, Giacomo Bongiovanni, Clara Rizzo, Jay Chhablani, Edoardo Midena, Marco Lupidi","doi":"10.1177/11206721251337139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study investigated the applicability of a validated AI-algorithm for analyzing different retinal biomarkers in eyes affected by epiretinal membranes (ERMs) before and after surgery.MethodsA retrospective study included 40 patients surgically treated for ERMs removal between November 2022 and January 2024. Pars plana vitrectomy with ERM/ILM peeling was performed by a single experienced surgeon. A validated AI algorithm was used to analyze OCT scans, focusing on intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) interruption percentages and hyper-reflective foci (HRF) counts.ResultsPostoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 483.61 ± 96.32 to 386.82 ± 94.86 µm (<i>p</i> = 0.001). IRF volume reduced from 0.283 ± 0.39 mm<sup>3</sup> to 0.142 ± 0.27 mm<sup>3</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.036) particularly in the central 1 mm-circle. SRF, HRF and EZ/ELM interruption percentages exhibited no significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Significant correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were found between preoperative BCVA and postoperative BCVA (<i>r</i> = 0.45); CMT reduction and postoperative BCVA (<i>r</i> = 0.42), preoperative IRF and Visual Recovery (<i>r</i> = -0.48), ELM and EZ interruption and visual recovery (<i>r</i> = -0.43 and <i>r</i> = -0.47 respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluid distribution, especially in the central subfield, correlated with BCVA recovery (R2 = 0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.05; Pillai's Trace = 0.79).ConclusionThe study highlights AI's potential in quantifying OCT biomarkers in ERMs surgery. The findings suggest that improved BCVA is associated with reduced CMT, IRF, and redistribution of IRF towards the periphery. EZ and ELM integrities remain crucial prognostic factors, emphasizing the importance of the preoperative analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1542-1553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based assessment of imaging biomarkers in epiretinal membrane surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Cesare Mariotti, Lorenzo Mangoni, Alessio Muzi, Michele Fella, Veronica Mogetta, Giacomo Bongiovanni, Clara Rizzo, Jay Chhablani, Edoardo Midena, Marco Lupidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721251337139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThis study investigated the applicability of a validated AI-algorithm for analyzing different retinal biomarkers in eyes affected by epiretinal membranes (ERMs) before and after surgery.MethodsA retrospective study included 40 patients surgically treated for ERMs removal between November 2022 and January 2024. Pars plana vitrectomy with ERM/ILM peeling was performed by a single experienced surgeon. A validated AI algorithm was used to analyze OCT scans, focusing on intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) interruption percentages and hyper-reflective foci (HRF) counts.ResultsPostoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 483.61 ± 96.32 to 386.82 ± 94.86 µm (<i>p</i> = 0.001). IRF volume reduced from 0.283 ± 0.39 mm<sup>3</sup> to 0.142 ± 0.27 mm<sup>3</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.036) particularly in the central 1 mm-circle. SRF, HRF and EZ/ELM interruption percentages exhibited no significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Significant correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were found between preoperative BCVA and postoperative BCVA (<i>r</i> = 0.45); CMT reduction and postoperative BCVA (<i>r</i> = 0.42), preoperative IRF and Visual Recovery (<i>r</i> = -0.48), ELM and EZ interruption and visual recovery (<i>r</i> = -0.43 and <i>r</i> = -0.47 respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluid distribution, especially in the central subfield, correlated with BCVA recovery (R2 = 0.38; <i>p</i> < 0.05; Pillai's Trace = 0.79).ConclusionThe study highlights AI's potential in quantifying OCT biomarkers in ERMs surgery. The findings suggest that improved BCVA is associated with reduced CMT, IRF, and redistribution of IRF towards the periphery. EZ and ELM integrities remain crucial prognostic factors, emphasizing the importance of the preoperative analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1542-1553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251337139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251337139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究探讨了一种经过验证的人工智能算法在视网膜前膜(ERMs)影响的眼睛手术前后分析不同视网膜生物标志物的适用性。方法回顾性研究包括40例于2022年11月至2024年1月间接受erm切除手术的患者。玻璃体切除伴ERM/ILM剥离由一名经验丰富的外科医生完成。使用经过验证的AI算法分析OCT扫描,重点关注视网膜内液(IRF)和视网膜下液(SRF)体积、外限制膜(ELM)和椭球区(EZ)中断百分比和超反射灶(HRF)计数。结果术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)明显改善(p p = 0.001)。IRF体积从0.283±0.39 mm3减少到0.142±0.27 mm3 (p = 0.036),特别是在中心1mm -circle。SRF、HRF和EZ/ELM中断率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。显著相关(p r = 0.45);CMT减少与术后BCVA (r = 0.42),术前IRF与视力恢复(r = -0.48), ELM和EZ中断与视力恢复(r = -0.43和r = -0.47)。多因素分析表明,流体分布与BCVA采收率(R2 = 0.38;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence-based assessment of imaging biomarkers in epiretinal membrane surgery.

PurposeThis study investigated the applicability of a validated AI-algorithm for analyzing different retinal biomarkers in eyes affected by epiretinal membranes (ERMs) before and after surgery.MethodsA retrospective study included 40 patients surgically treated for ERMs removal between November 2022 and January 2024. Pars plana vitrectomy with ERM/ILM peeling was performed by a single experienced surgeon. A validated AI algorithm was used to analyze OCT scans, focusing on intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) interruption percentages and hyper-reflective foci (HRF) counts.ResultsPostoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved (p < 0.01), and central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 483.61 ± 96.32 to 386.82 ± 94.86 µm (p = 0.001). IRF volume reduced from 0.283 ± 0.39 mm3 to 0.142 ± 0.27 mm3 (p = 0.036) particularly in the central 1 mm-circle. SRF, HRF and EZ/ELM interruption percentages exhibited no significant differences (p > 0.05). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were found between preoperative BCVA and postoperative BCVA (r = 0.45); CMT reduction and postoperative BCVA (r = 0.42), preoperative IRF and Visual Recovery (r = -0.48), ELM and EZ interruption and visual recovery (r = -0.43 and r = -0.47 respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluid distribution, especially in the central subfield, correlated with BCVA recovery (R2 = 0.38; p < 0.05; Pillai's Trace = 0.79).ConclusionThe study highlights AI's potential in quantifying OCT biomarkers in ERMs surgery. The findings suggest that improved BCVA is associated with reduced CMT, IRF, and redistribution of IRF towards the periphery. EZ and ELM integrities remain crucial prognostic factors, emphasizing the importance of the preoperative analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信