María Medina-Gil, Ana Martín-Díaz, Natalia Navarrete, José Aranguren, P S Ortolani-Seltenerich, Giulia Malvicini, Gaya C S Vieira, Alejandro R Pérez
{"title":"双根管下颌前磨牙三维模型往复系统的微计算机断层扫描分析。","authors":"María Medina-Gil, Ana Martín-Díaz, Natalia Navarrete, José Aranguren, P S Ortolani-Seltenerich, Giulia Malvicini, Gaya C S Vieira, Alejandro R Pérez","doi":"10.3390/dj13040175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study investigated the shaping efficiency of four reciprocating systems-WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue, Excalibur, and One Reci-in three dimensional (3D) resin models of natural mandibular premolar teeth with two canals. <b>Methods:</b> Forty 3D-printed mandibular premolars (Vertucci configuration type V) were divided into four groups, each of which was assigned one of the reciprocating systems. According to the manufacturer's protocols, each canal was prepared, with pre- and post-instrumentation micro computed tomography (micro-CT) scans evaluating canal volume, surface area, percentage of unprepared canal walls, and resin reduction in the pericervical area. Instrumentation time and screw-in sensation were recorded as qualitative performance indicators. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests with a significance of (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> All systems increased canal volume and surface area, primarily in the apical third, with Reciproc Blue and One Reci achieving the largest volume. WaveOne Gold had the highest percentage of unprepared walls (27.03%) and Reciproc Blue the lowest (19.65%), though these differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Reciproc Blue caused the highest pericervical resin loss (22.24%), significantly higher than Excalibur (15.09%) and One Reci (15.17%) (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Reciproc Blue exhibited the highest incidence of screw-in sensation (70%), while WaveOne Gold achieved the shortest instrumentation time (86.7 s), although neither variable showed statistical significance. <b>Conclusions:</b> All systems effectively shaped complex canal anatomies, with Reciproc Blue demonstrating the highest dentin removal and WaveOne Gold proving the most time efficient. Clinically, these findings suggest that instrument selection should balance shaping efficiency with dentin preservation. Minimizing unprepared areas and preserving pericervical dentin are essential for enhancing disinfection and reducing the risk of root fractures, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of endodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Reciprocating Systems in Three-Dimensional Models of Mandibular Premolars with Two Canals.\",\"authors\":\"María Medina-Gil, Ana Martín-Díaz, Natalia Navarrete, José Aranguren, P S Ortolani-Seltenerich, Giulia Malvicini, Gaya C S Vieira, Alejandro R Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13040175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study investigated the shaping efficiency of four reciprocating systems-WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue, Excalibur, and One Reci-in three dimensional (3D) resin models of natural mandibular premolar teeth with two canals. <b>Methods:</b> Forty 3D-printed mandibular premolars (Vertucci configuration type V) were divided into four groups, each of which was assigned one of the reciprocating systems. According to the manufacturer's protocols, each canal was prepared, with pre- and post-instrumentation micro computed tomography (micro-CT) scans evaluating canal volume, surface area, percentage of unprepared canal walls, and resin reduction in the pericervical area. Instrumentation time and screw-in sensation were recorded as qualitative performance indicators. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests with a significance of (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> All systems increased canal volume and surface area, primarily in the apical third, with Reciproc Blue and One Reci achieving the largest volume. WaveOne Gold had the highest percentage of unprepared walls (27.03%) and Reciproc Blue the lowest (19.65%), though these differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Reciproc Blue caused the highest pericervical resin loss (22.24%), significantly higher than Excalibur (15.09%) and One Reci (15.17%) (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Reciproc Blue exhibited the highest incidence of screw-in sensation (70%), while WaveOne Gold achieved the shortest instrumentation time (86.7 s), although neither variable showed statistical significance. <b>Conclusions:</b> All systems effectively shaped complex canal anatomies, with Reciproc Blue demonstrating the highest dentin removal and WaveOne Gold proving the most time efficient. Clinically, these findings suggest that instrument selection should balance shaping efficiency with dentin preservation. Minimizing unprepared areas and preserving pericervical dentin are essential for enhancing disinfection and reducing the risk of root fractures, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of endodontic treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13040175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13040175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Reciprocating Systems in Three-Dimensional Models of Mandibular Premolars with Two Canals.
Objective: This study investigated the shaping efficiency of four reciprocating systems-WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue, Excalibur, and One Reci-in three dimensional (3D) resin models of natural mandibular premolar teeth with two canals. Methods: Forty 3D-printed mandibular premolars (Vertucci configuration type V) were divided into four groups, each of which was assigned one of the reciprocating systems. According to the manufacturer's protocols, each canal was prepared, with pre- and post-instrumentation micro computed tomography (micro-CT) scans evaluating canal volume, surface area, percentage of unprepared canal walls, and resin reduction in the pericervical area. Instrumentation time and screw-in sensation were recorded as qualitative performance indicators. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests with a significance of (p < 0.05). Results: All systems increased canal volume and surface area, primarily in the apical third, with Reciproc Blue and One Reci achieving the largest volume. WaveOne Gold had the highest percentage of unprepared walls (27.03%) and Reciproc Blue the lowest (19.65%), though these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Reciproc Blue caused the highest pericervical resin loss (22.24%), significantly higher than Excalibur (15.09%) and One Reci (15.17%) (p = 0.035). Reciproc Blue exhibited the highest incidence of screw-in sensation (70%), while WaveOne Gold achieved the shortest instrumentation time (86.7 s), although neither variable showed statistical significance. Conclusions: All systems effectively shaped complex canal anatomies, with Reciproc Blue demonstrating the highest dentin removal and WaveOne Gold proving the most time efficient. Clinically, these findings suggest that instrument selection should balance shaping efficiency with dentin preservation. Minimizing unprepared areas and preserving pericervical dentin are essential for enhancing disinfection and reducing the risk of root fractures, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of endodontic treatment.