压疮的局部治疗方式:回顾性分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Pinar Oztas, Emine Karabulut Demirci, F Nur Baran Aksakal, Mucahit Yildiz
{"title":"压疮的局部治疗方式:回顾性分析。","authors":"Pinar Oztas, Emine Karabulut Demirci, F Nur Baran Aksakal, Mucahit Yildiz","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pressure ulcers (PUs) are areas of localised tissue damage affecting the skin, soft tissue, muscle or underlying tissues which is caused by continuous pressure, friction or shear. Medical caregivers should primarily focus on patients at high risk of developing these injuries to prevent their development. However, once a PU has developed, different therapy options and proper surgical intervention are the main treatment options. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of PU topical therapeutic alternatives retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this single-centre study, the medical records of hospitalised patients with stage 2 and deeper PUs were screened retrospectively. The patients' age, sex, Waterlow score, mobilisation status, hospitalisation period, PU stage, PU stage on day of discharge, and PU therapy used were recorded. Any evidence of healing was accepted as a successful treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The medical records of 511 patients were screened for this study. At discharge day, 55.4% of patients with PUs did not show any evidence of healing. In suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) PUs, there was a higher rate of therapy success (59.4% at day of discharge) (p<0.05). With regards to the hospitalisation period, when patients stayed >30 days, the rate of therapy success increased (p<0.05). The most effective topical therapy was multilayer silicone foam dressing (p<0.05). The topical application of rifamycin and povidone-iodine solution appeared to worsen the condition of the PU (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with PUs in this study, the topical therapy was more effective in SDTIs and if the hospitalisation was of long enough duration for the treatment to take effect. Multilayer silicone foam dressing therapy was found to be the most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 4","pages":"312-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical treatment modalities in pressure ulcers: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Oztas, Emine Karabulut Demirci, F Nur Baran Aksakal, Mucahit Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2021.0395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pressure ulcers (PUs) are areas of localised tissue damage affecting the skin, soft tissue, muscle or underlying tissues which is caused by continuous pressure, friction or shear. Medical caregivers should primarily focus on patients at high risk of developing these injuries to prevent their development. However, once a PU has developed, different therapy options and proper surgical intervention are the main treatment options. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of PU topical therapeutic alternatives retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this single-centre study, the medical records of hospitalised patients with stage 2 and deeper PUs were screened retrospectively. The patients' age, sex, Waterlow score, mobilisation status, hospitalisation period, PU stage, PU stage on day of discharge, and PU therapy used were recorded. Any evidence of healing was accepted as a successful treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The medical records of 511 patients were screened for this study. At discharge day, 55.4% of patients with PUs did not show any evidence of healing. In suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) PUs, there was a higher rate of therapy success (59.4% at day of discharge) (p<0.05). With regards to the hospitalisation period, when patients stayed >30 days, the rate of therapy success increased (p<0.05). The most effective topical therapy was multilayer silicone foam dressing (p<0.05). The topical application of rifamycin and povidone-iodine solution appeared to worsen the condition of the PU (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with PUs in this study, the topical therapy was more effective in SDTIs and if the hospitalisation was of long enough duration for the treatment to take effect. Multilayer silicone foam dressing therapy was found to be the most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"312-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0395\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:压疮(PUs)是影响皮肤,软组织,肌肉或底层组织的局部组织损伤区域,由持续的压力,摩擦或剪切引起。医疗护理人员应主要关注发展这些损伤的高风险患者,以防止其发展。然而,一旦PU发展,不同的治疗选择和适当的手术干预是主要的治疗选择。本研究的目的是回顾性研究外用PU治疗方案的有效性。方法:在这项单中心研究中,对住院的2期深部脓肿患者的病历进行回顾性筛选。记录患者的年龄、性别、Waterlow评分、活动情况、住院时间、PU分期、出院当日PU分期、PU治疗情况。任何治愈的证据都被认为是成功的治疗结果。结果:本研究筛选了511例患者的病历。出院时,55.4%的脓毒症患者没有任何愈合的迹象。在疑似深部组织损伤(SDTI)脓肿中,治疗成功率更高(出院当天为59.4%)(p30天,治疗成功率增加)(p结论:在本研究的脓肿患者中,局部治疗对SDTI患者更有效,如果住院时间足够长,治疗效果更好。多层硅胶泡沫敷料治疗是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical treatment modalities in pressure ulcers: a retrospective analysis.

Objective: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are areas of localised tissue damage affecting the skin, soft tissue, muscle or underlying tissues which is caused by continuous pressure, friction or shear. Medical caregivers should primarily focus on patients at high risk of developing these injuries to prevent their development. However, once a PU has developed, different therapy options and proper surgical intervention are the main treatment options. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of PU topical therapeutic alternatives retrospectively.

Method: In this single-centre study, the medical records of hospitalised patients with stage 2 and deeper PUs were screened retrospectively. The patients' age, sex, Waterlow score, mobilisation status, hospitalisation period, PU stage, PU stage on day of discharge, and PU therapy used were recorded. Any evidence of healing was accepted as a successful treatment outcome.

Results: The medical records of 511 patients were screened for this study. At discharge day, 55.4% of patients with PUs did not show any evidence of healing. In suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) PUs, there was a higher rate of therapy success (59.4% at day of discharge) (p<0.05). With regards to the hospitalisation period, when patients stayed >30 days, the rate of therapy success increased (p<0.05). The most effective topical therapy was multilayer silicone foam dressing (p<0.05). The topical application of rifamycin and povidone-iodine solution appeared to worsen the condition of the PU (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with PUs in this study, the topical therapy was more effective in SDTIs and if the hospitalisation was of long enough duration for the treatment to take effect. Multilayer silicone foam dressing therapy was found to be the most effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信