不同冲洗剂对牙本质小管混合生物膜的影响:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Dide Tekinarslan, Kürşat Er, Mine Eğin, Tuba Dinçer, Ali Osman Kiliç
{"title":"不同冲洗剂对牙本质小管混合生物膜的影响:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。","authors":"Dide Tekinarslan, Kürşat Er, Mine Eğin, Tuba Dinçer, Ali Osman Kiliç","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the bacterial disinfection efficacy of three different irrigation solutions and their combined usage in dentin tubules contaminated with mixed biofilms. A total of 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Next X4, sterilized, and then inoculated with mixed biofilm for 7 days. After biofilm formation, the teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) based on the irrigation solution used: Group 1: sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Group 2: chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), Group 3: polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), Group 4: NaOCl + CHX, Group 5: NaOCl + PHMB, Group 6: distilled water (control group). The teeth were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds and stained with LIVE/DEAD BackLight and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) to determine the depth of dead bacterial penetration into the dentinal tubules. Additionally, one tooth from each group was subjected to bacterial viable counting before and after irrigation. The CLSM analysis revealed that the greatest penetration of dead bacteria occurred in the coronal third, followed by the apical and middle third (p < 0.05). Combined solutions demonstrated significantly higher disinfection efficacy compared with PHMB alone (p < 0.001). Viable count analysis revealed that Group 4 and Group 5 exhibited the greatest reduction in bacterial proliferation, respectively. The combined use of solutions was found to be more effective than the sole use of solutions. Therefore, it is recommended to combine irrigation solutions during final irrigation in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Various Irrigants on Mixed Biofilms in Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dide Tekinarslan, Kürşat Er, Mine Eğin, Tuba Dinçer, Ali Osman Kiliç\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jemt.24877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the bacterial disinfection efficacy of three different irrigation solutions and their combined usage in dentin tubules contaminated with mixed biofilms. A total of 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Next X4, sterilized, and then inoculated with mixed biofilm for 7 days. After biofilm formation, the teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) based on the irrigation solution used: Group 1: sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Group 2: chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), Group 3: polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), Group 4: NaOCl + CHX, Group 5: NaOCl + PHMB, Group 6: distilled water (control group). The teeth were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds and stained with LIVE/DEAD BackLight and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) to determine the depth of dead bacterial penetration into the dentinal tubules. Additionally, one tooth from each group was subjected to bacterial viable counting before and after irrigation. The CLSM analysis revealed that the greatest penetration of dead bacteria occurred in the coronal third, followed by the apical and middle third (p < 0.05). Combined solutions demonstrated significantly higher disinfection efficacy compared with PHMB alone (p < 0.001). Viable count analysis revealed that Group 4 and Group 5 exhibited the greatest reduction in bacterial proliferation, respectively. The combined use of solutions was found to be more effective than the sole use of solutions. Therefore, it is recommended to combine irrigation solutions during final irrigation in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24877\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评价了三种不同的冲洗液及其联合使用对混合生物膜污染的牙本质小管的细菌消毒效果。用ProTaper Next X4制备60颗单根下颌前磨牙,消毒后接种混合生物膜7 d。生物膜形成后,根据使用的冲洗液随机分为6组(n = 10):第1组:次氯酸钠(NaOCl),第2组:葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX),第3组:聚己烯双胍(PHMB),第4组:NaOCl + CHX,第5组:NaOCl + PHMB,第6组:蒸馏水(对照组)。在冠状、中间和根尖三分之一处对牙齿进行切片,用LIVE/DEAD背光染色,并在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)下检查,以确定死细菌渗透到牙髓小管的深度。冲洗前后,每组各取1颗牙进行细菌活菌计数。CLSM分析显示,死细菌的最大渗透发生在冠状三分之一,其次是根尖和中间三分之一(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Various Irrigants on Mixed Biofilms in Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.

This study evaluated the bacterial disinfection efficacy of three different irrigation solutions and their combined usage in dentin tubules contaminated with mixed biofilms. A total of 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Next X4, sterilized, and then inoculated with mixed biofilm for 7 days. After biofilm formation, the teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) based on the irrigation solution used: Group 1: sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Group 2: chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), Group 3: polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), Group 4: NaOCl + CHX, Group 5: NaOCl + PHMB, Group 6: distilled water (control group). The teeth were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds and stained with LIVE/DEAD BackLight and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) to determine the depth of dead bacterial penetration into the dentinal tubules. Additionally, one tooth from each group was subjected to bacterial viable counting before and after irrigation. The CLSM analysis revealed that the greatest penetration of dead bacteria occurred in the coronal third, followed by the apical and middle third (p < 0.05). Combined solutions demonstrated significantly higher disinfection efficacy compared with PHMB alone (p < 0.001). Viable count analysis revealed that Group 4 and Group 5 exhibited the greatest reduction in bacterial proliferation, respectively. The combined use of solutions was found to be more effective than the sole use of solutions. Therefore, it is recommended to combine irrigation solutions during final irrigation in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信