优化网球发球策略:纳什均衡和不同场地的焦点。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2502891
Rouli Ye, Wenming Liu
{"title":"优化网球发球策略:纳什均衡和不同场地的焦点。","authors":"Rouli Ye, Wenming Liu","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzes 120 men's singles tennis matches using the Stroke Performance Relevance (SPR) metric and Nash equilibrium from game theory, focusing on serve strategies across different court surfaces. The SPR metric quantifies the impact of each stroke on match dynamics, providing a comprehensive alternative to traditional outcome-based metrics. Results show that on hard courts, first serves to the outside placement achieve the highest expected return (27.3), while on clay courts, the outside has the highest probability distribution (22.1%). For second serves, hard courts favor the inside with the highest expected return (2.3), whereas grass courts demonstrate the highest probability in the outside (6.0%). These findings underscore the critical need to adapt serve strategies to court-specific characteristics, enabling players to maximize strategic efficiency. Coaches can utilize these insights to develop targeted training programs. By integrating the SPR metric and Nash equilibrium, this study combines stroke impact quantification through SPR with game-theoretic strategy optimization. This integration enables players to dynamically adapt serve strategies during matches and empowers coaches to design surface-specific training regimens, thereby enhancing competitive performance through data-driven tactical adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1417-1424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing serve strategies in tennis: A focus on Nash equilibrium and different court surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Rouli Ye, Wenming Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study analyzes 120 men's singles tennis matches using the Stroke Performance Relevance (SPR) metric and Nash equilibrium from game theory, focusing on serve strategies across different court surfaces. The SPR metric quantifies the impact of each stroke on match dynamics, providing a comprehensive alternative to traditional outcome-based metrics. Results show that on hard courts, first serves to the outside placement achieve the highest expected return (27.3), while on clay courts, the outside has the highest probability distribution (22.1%). For second serves, hard courts favor the inside with the highest expected return (2.3), whereas grass courts demonstrate the highest probability in the outside (6.0%). These findings underscore the critical need to adapt serve strategies to court-specific characteristics, enabling players to maximize strategic efficiency. Coaches can utilize these insights to develop targeted training programs. By integrating the SPR metric and Nash equilibrium, this study combines stroke impact quantification through SPR with game-theoretic strategy optimization. This integration enables players to dynamically adapt serve strategies during matches and empowers coaches to design surface-specific training regimens, thereby enhancing competitive performance through data-driven tactical adjustments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1417-1424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502891\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究运用博弈论中的击球表现相关性(SPR)指标和纳什均衡分析了120场男子网球单打比赛,重点研究了不同场地的发球策略。SPR指标量化了每次冲程对匹配动态的影响,为传统的基于结果的指标提供了一个全面的替代方案。结果表明,在硬地场上,第一次发球到外场的期望击球率最高(27.3%),而在红土场上,第一次发球到外场的期望击球率概率分布最高(22.1%)。对于二发,硬地球场更倾向于内场,期望得分最高(2.3),而草地球场在外场的概率最高(6.0%)。这些发现强调了根据球场特点调整发球策略的重要性,使球员能够最大限度地提高策略效率。教练可以利用这些见解来制定有针对性的训练计划。通过整合SPR度量和纳什均衡,将SPR的冲程影响量化与博弈论策略优化相结合。这种整合使球员能够在比赛中动态调整发球策略,并授权教练设计特定场地的训练方案,从而通过数据驱动的战术调整来提高竞争表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing serve strategies in tennis: A focus on Nash equilibrium and different court surfaces.

This study analyzes 120 men's singles tennis matches using the Stroke Performance Relevance (SPR) metric and Nash equilibrium from game theory, focusing on serve strategies across different court surfaces. The SPR metric quantifies the impact of each stroke on match dynamics, providing a comprehensive alternative to traditional outcome-based metrics. Results show that on hard courts, first serves to the outside placement achieve the highest expected return (27.3), while on clay courts, the outside has the highest probability distribution (22.1%). For second serves, hard courts favor the inside with the highest expected return (2.3), whereas grass courts demonstrate the highest probability in the outside (6.0%). These findings underscore the critical need to adapt serve strategies to court-specific characteristics, enabling players to maximize strategic efficiency. Coaches can utilize these insights to develop targeted training programs. By integrating the SPR metric and Nash equilibrium, this study combines stroke impact quantification through SPR with game-theoretic strategy optimization. This integration enables players to dynamically adapt serve strategies during matches and empowers coaches to design surface-specific training regimens, thereby enhancing competitive performance through data-driven tactical adjustments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信